• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

According to the Historian of Your Choice, Who Was Responsible For the First World War and Evaluate.

Extracts from this document...


According to the Historian of Your Choice, Who Was Responsible For the First World War and Evaluate. There are many different opinions and beliefs on who or what was to blame for the First World War. The historian Fritz Fisher had a very strong and controversial answer to whom he believed was responsible for the First World War. Fisher has produced two books in which he details Germany's planning's and aspirations for War. One of Fishers main arguments was that Germany was seeking to expand her empire. As a relatively new country Fisher believed that Germany felt behind with her empire and by invading countries such as France and Poland she would also gain colonies and territory overseas. Fishers' beliefs were very unsettling to the people of his homeland Germany. Most German citizens saw themselves as victims of a harsh treaty and for one of their people to come to the verdict that Germany was to blame for the First World War was looked upon with shock and horror. ...read more.


More evidence to back up Fisher's belief is that Germany did nothing to prevent the crisis from happening. Wilhelm II even allowed the French and the Russians to form their own alliances while strengthening his own with Austria. These alliances are the sides that form the First World War. This backs up Fisher's theory as it presents Germany as a country using alliances to create tensions that could cause a War. Kaiser William also challenged Britain by increasing his naval programme. Britain was very proud of having the best navy in the world and actively building one to challenge it was seen as very provocative. This also supports Fisher as it shows that Germany was willing to challenge Britain and could have also been preparing her navy for the outbreak of War. Kaiser William was also provoking to the French when he made his Tangier speech where he said that he supported the independence of Morocco and demanded an international conference to discuss Morocco's future. ...read more.


I believe that to blame Germany alone would be unfair due to the particularly aggressive behaviour of Austria-Hungary and Russia. Germany was also but under a lot of pressure by French and Russian encirclement and could have been making alliances in her defence. I think that Germany was encouraging War between Austria and Serbia with hope to establish herself as a major European power. I think that it was possible that European powers could have been overly suspicious of Germany, which increased tension. To conclude I do not totally disagree with Fritz Fisher's proposals. I do believe that Germany was more to blame than other countries and that she was planning for War. I think that there were other causes of the First World War like the long-standing rivalry between Austria-Hungary and Russia due to their interests in the Balkans. It could even be said that the Russia and France alliance was provoking to Germany. However, I think that it is fair to say that Germany was welcome to the prospect of War so that she could prove herself and become a dominant European power. Amy Jones 12B ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    Source F also gives us another tactic used by Haig, 'if he could kill more Germans than the Germans could kill his men, then they would win the war', we know this is true because he would sent men over the top where they would be killed.

  2. To what extent was Hitler solely responsible for the Holocaust

    The transport of German Jews to extermination camps usually required the assistance of many local authorities, from the Finance Office (whom collected property inventories from deportees) to the House Office whom (would dispose of vacant apartments). In addition, the assistance of officials from the German railroad (Relchsbahn)

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    Free and compulsory secondary schooling seemed to suggest that girls would no longer be prevented from gaining the education needed for a career. No more would they be forced into unskilled and lowly paid work at an early age, which they gave up when they got married.

  2. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    The dreadful era of fear and hostility was finally over. The Cold War had lasting effects on the entire world. Communism left Russia crippled and in a state of depression. The Cold War led to great advancements in nuclear weapon technology and space technology.

  1. To What extent was the German Government responsible for the outbreak of the First ...

    This can be seen in the Tirpitz memorandum where the Admiral says, '[Britain] is an enemy against which we must urgently require a certain measure of naval force.' Historians have expressed suspicions over whether Germany's claim of a fear of encirclement was legitimate, or simply propaganda to persuade the public that an aggressive war was necessary for protection.

  2. China After World War II

    concept of "good" and "bad" capitalists in other lands, is widespread in China today, thanks to Stalinist propaganda. The stratum which the Stalinists designate as "bureaucratic" consists in reality of the finance-capitalists who have close ties with the big landlords, on the one hand, and with Wall Street on the other.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Leftist and Muslim-based parties operated closely with the PLO and received heavy financial and military support from Arab countries, notably Libya, Syria and Iraq. Christian-based parties, for their part, relied mainly on private financial support. They also received military assistance, beginning in 1973, from the Lebanese army, which consisted of training and light weapons.

  2. Interpretations of The First World War.

    It looks a really hot, sunny day out there and the is not one thing out of place. This is a piece of propaganda (a real life event that has been turned around to be used for advertisement). There is no way that these people could stand over the wall

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work