• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

According to the Historian of Your Choice, Who Was Responsible For the First World War and Evaluate.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

According to the Historian of Your Choice, Who Was Responsible For the First World War and Evaluate. There are many different opinions and beliefs on who or what was to blame for the First World War. The historian Fritz Fisher had a very strong and controversial answer to whom he believed was responsible for the First World War. Fisher has produced two books in which he details Germany's planning's and aspirations for War. One of Fishers main arguments was that Germany was seeking to expand her empire. As a relatively new country Fisher believed that Germany felt behind with her empire and by invading countries such as France and Poland she would also gain colonies and territory overseas. Fishers' beliefs were very unsettling to the people of his homeland Germany. Most German citizens saw themselves as victims of a harsh treaty and for one of their people to come to the verdict that Germany was to blame for the First World War was looked upon with shock and horror. ...read more.

Middle

More evidence to back up Fisher's belief is that Germany did nothing to prevent the crisis from happening. Wilhelm II even allowed the French and the Russians to form their own alliances while strengthening his own with Austria. These alliances are the sides that form the First World War. This backs up Fisher's theory as it presents Germany as a country using alliances to create tensions that could cause a War. Kaiser William also challenged Britain by increasing his naval programme. Britain was very proud of having the best navy in the world and actively building one to challenge it was seen as very provocative. This also supports Fisher as it shows that Germany was willing to challenge Britain and could have also been preparing her navy for the outbreak of War. Kaiser William was also provoking to the French when he made his Tangier speech where he said that he supported the independence of Morocco and demanded an international conference to discuss Morocco's future. ...read more.

Conclusion

I believe that to blame Germany alone would be unfair due to the particularly aggressive behaviour of Austria-Hungary and Russia. Germany was also but under a lot of pressure by French and Russian encirclement and could have been making alliances in her defence. I think that Germany was encouraging War between Austria and Serbia with hope to establish herself as a major European power. I think that it was possible that European powers could have been overly suspicious of Germany, which increased tension. To conclude I do not totally disagree with Fritz Fisher's proposals. I do believe that Germany was more to blame than other countries and that she was planning for War. I think that there were other causes of the First World War like the long-standing rivalry between Austria-Hungary and Russia due to their interests in the Balkans. It could even be said that the Russia and France alliance was provoking to Germany. However, I think that it is fair to say that Germany was welcome to the prospect of War so that she could prove herself and become a dominant European power. Amy Jones 12B ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    Source F also gives us another tactic used by Haig, 'if he could kill more Germans than the Germans could kill his men, then they would win the war', we know this is true because he would sent men over the top where they would be killed.

  2. To what extent was Hitler solely responsible for the Holocaust

    For example, the Philosopher Paul de Lagarde, whom regarded Jews as 'vermin' and that there was a need to 'remove the source of the infection'. 11 By the late nineteenth century, despite the fact they were less than 1% of the population many regarded the Jews as a problem.

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    The 1944 Act marked an important change in educational policy in Britain. For the first time the government acknowledged that all children had a right to secondary education free of charge. The Act also granted, in theory at least, equality of opportunity in education to girls.

  2. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    It became impossible for either Josef Stalin (Soviet leader) or Harry Truman (US President) to agree on any political matter. A mutual fear grew between the two, each afraid that the other would gain more power. After the German defeat in 1945, the three major-allied leaders, the USSR's Josef Stalin, Great Britain's Winston Churchill and US President Franklin D.

  1. To What extent was Germany Responsible for the outbreak of World War One?

    Germany's intimidating attempts to influence the world stage merely strengthened forces of opposition to her ambitions in Europe. Britain responded by building a bigger and better navy, resulting in costly arms wars and by forming the Triple Entente, which placed Germany in an even worse position than before.

  2. To What extent was the German Government responsible for the outbreak of the First ...

    This reinforces the claim that Alliances escalated small conflicts into world-wide competition. Historians suggest that alliances made violence almost inevitable and comment that without them, international squabbles would never have led to such a catastrophic war. For instance Germany's aggression in Morocco was an attempt to display Germany as a more necessary and influential ally than Britain.

  1. China After World War II

    Thus the end of China's eight-year struggle against Japanese imperialism, fought at terrific cost in human life and treasure, finds the Chinese people still far from their goal of national independence. This situation was foreseen by the Trotskyist movement. In a thesis entitled The War in the Far East and

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    With its para-military structure and large following in various parts of the country, the Kataeb Party was, as Frank Stoakes indicated, 'a valuable auxiliary of the state' and always ready to come to its defence in times of crisis.' Other parties began to organise militarily, notably Chamoun's National Liberal Party

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work