• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Account for the emergence of Stalin rather than Trotsky as the successor of Lenin

Extracts from this document...


David Norton 5th Form History Coursework Russia 1905 - 1941 Account for the emergence of Stalin rather than Trotsky as the successor of Lenin In 1922 and 1923 Lenin suffered many strokes that led to him being paralysed and to his death in January 1924. After Lenin's death there were many possibilities to who would take over from Lenin. Among these were Kamenev and Zinoviev (leading Bolsheviks from the Revolution of 1917) , Bukharin, Josef Stalin and Leon Trotsky (two leading men in the Communist Party) The two leading figures were Stalin and Trotsky. Trotsky, originally named Bronstein, was a very talented individual. He was highly intelligent, a very good speaker (as was seen from his negotiations at Brest-Litovsk) and he was also a very good commander and organiser (as was seen during the revolution and the civil war). ...read more.


Stalin started as head of the Orgburo where he managed the communist Party machine. He soon became head of the Control Commission and here he controlled party membership. This was an important position for Stalin as he could replace people in the Party who didn't support his views with people who did. He could also reject membership from those he did not want in the Party. In 1922 Stalin made his way up to General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Stalin told the Russian people that the Party should try to have Socialism in one country, not try to spread revolution over the world. This gained him many supporters as the Russian people were tired and wanted peace. One trick that Stalin supposedly played on Trotsky was that he told Trotsky Lenin's funeral was on the 26th January, when it was really on the 27th. ...read more.


This reassured Stalin and he soon regained his confidence. From January 1925 Kamenev, Stalin and Zinoviev were a triumvirate against Trotsky (who was now the ex-war Commissar). However, in the Party Congress of 1925 Bukharin and Stalin on the right clashed with Kamenev, Trotsky and Zinoviev on the left. The right believed in Socialism in one country and the left believed in Trotsky's theory of "Permanent Revolution". In 1926 Trotsky was dismissed from the Politburo and in 1927 he was dismissed from the Party. At the Party Congress of 1927 Stalin said there should be "no deviation from the Party line as interpreted by the General Secretary." This let Stalin control everything the Party did as he was the General Secretary. In 1928 Stalin clashed with Bukharin over the NEP (New Economic Policy); Stalin believed the country should be collectivised and nationalised. Bukharin soon resigned from the Politburo. In 1928 Trotsky was sent to Siberia and in 1929 he was sent into exile. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How did Stalin, who was illustrated by Leon Trotsky himself as 'the most eminent ...

    When Lenin and the Bolsheviks assumed total control of Russia after the 1917 Revolution, they realized that they were not a traditional form of Russian government; they were unskilled and untrained in matters concerning government due to the fact that all their original efforts and actions were inclined towards just pure revolution.

  2. "Why did Stalin, rather than Trotsky, emerge as Lenin's successor?"

    Trotsky knew about this but kept quiet because he knew it would lead to unrest in the party. This again is another reason why it was Stalin who became leader and not Trotsky. In the struggle for power, the party was split into left and right.

  1. History Coursework Sources Questions - Stalin and Trotsky

    Source D also gives us no evidence that Stalin is uniting the party, this also suggests otherwise. This political cartoon it is likely was allowed or more so approved by Stalin as it reflected his ideas. The cartoon depicting Trotsky as the organist - churning out his ideas, Zinoviev singing

  2. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    In Foundations of Leninism~ published early in 1924, he had denied that a proletarian dictatorship could establish socialism before the victory of the world revolution. A few months later, in Problems of Leninism, he advanced his theory of "Socialism in one country."

  1. The enormous role that Trotsky played in the success of the Bolsheviks up until ...

    His main task was to create quickly, an efficient and skilled army out of a rabble of workers and peasants that had the ability to equal and overcome the White army. At first, men were reluctant to fight. Trotsky, however, knowing how starving most of Russia was, made sure that the soldiers were the best fed people in Russia.

  2. Blitzkreig coursework

    This was done by Army group A that had invaded at Sedan being joined by Army group B that had invaded through Liege and then driving northwards to the English Channel. In France this ploy was very influential in the French�s failure to use their considerable armed to good effect

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The approach of war meant the original targets could not be met. 2. Shortages of skilled labour and shortage of oil amounted to a crisis. Further impacts: The working of the plans: Most of the decisions about planning were made at a high level ? by Stalin.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    The result was a harsh Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in March 1918.Lenin would do everuthing what�s in his power to achieve his proposals. Russia suffered a lot since the treaty was signed because due to this treaty Russia lost: 62 million people, which meant one-sixth of the population,which at the same

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work