• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Addressing Terrorism before 9/11.

Extracts from this document...


SUBJECT: Addressing Terrorism before 9/11 This past Sunday, pundit Fareed Zakaria alleged that the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which he characterized as "Bill Kristol's advocacy group," paid no attention to Al Qaeda in the 1990s. Similarly, Zakaria wrote last month in the New York Times, "One searches vainly through the archives of the Project for the New American Century, the main neoconservative advocacy group, for a single report on Al Qaeda or a letter urging action against it before 9/11." In fact, the directors and fellows of the Project published several articles on the subject of the war on terrorism and Al Qaeda prior to September 11.* In September 1998, after the embassy bombings, William Kristol and Robert Kagan wrote an editorial in the Weekly Standard in which they expressed concern that the Clinton administration's cruise missile strikes in Afghanistan and Sudan had not "made a dent in the terrorist networks" and questioned whether the Clinton administration "really has the stomach for such a war." ...read more.


Yet the reluctance to use military force in the Middle East is clearly a bipartisan American reflex. The fear that serious military responses to terrorist attacks can lead to an endless series of attacks and reprisals is an understandable foreboding. But what ought to be clear is that whoever perpetrated the attack on the U.S.S. Cole isn't going to desist voluntarily. Two men vaporized themselves to express their hatred of the United States. By any true-believing standard, their act was a glorious success, quite sufficient to inspire others to follow. We cannot counter such determination and passion in a courtroom.... Our enemies, and the friends of our enemies, must know that an easygoing, corpulent, wealthy Western nation is, when it wants to be, an indomitable, bloody-minded force that will seek awful vengeance upon its foes. In that same issue of the Weekly Standard, the Project's Deputy Executive Director, Tom Donnelly, complained that the Clinton administration did not recognize the attack on the U.S.S. ...read more.


Gerecht urged the adoption of a far more aggressive counter-terrorism policy-one much like that eventually adopted by the Bush administration after 9/11. Despite this commentary by Project directors and fellows, including especially Reuel Gerecht's all-too-prescient forecast, we would be the first to admit that we, like so many others, paid too little attention to the threat from Al Qaeda prior to September 11. We do find it odd, however, to be criticized by someone who seems to have paid even less attention to that threat than we did. A quick search of Zakaria's writings prior to September 11, 2001 produces only one article on the threat of global terrorism, with no mention of Al Qaeda or Osama bin Laden. ------------------------- * In addition to sending out faxes, Project directors and fellows publish articles on many subjects, and these publications often receive more attention than the faxes. Some of the articles discussed above were also faxed out, along with other memoranda such as an October 17, 2000 commentary on VOA coverage of the attack on the U.S.S. Cole. By any standard, Zakaria's search was incomplete. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Do the Writings of Clausewitz have contemporary relevance?

    As has been seen an enemy can be defeated without using conventional ground troops at all - instead a wide range of different assets could be used. Indeed one view of future warfare suggests that victory (but not necessarily destruction)

  2. Is "the war against terrorism" really a war? Applying the reasoning behind your answer, ...

    It is reasonable to quote the words of Granville Byford who says that "wars have typically been fought against proper nouns (Germany, for example) for good reasons that proper nouns can surrender and promise not to do it again. Wars against common nouns (poverty, crime, drugs) have been less successful.

  1. A Battle Without Borders : Terrorism

    it was an attack on the heart and soul of the civilized world. And the world has come together of fight a new and different war, the first, and we hope the only one, of the 21st century. A war against all those who seek to export terror and a war against those governments that support or shelter them.

  2. Vietnam Research Project

    I was too shocked to cry, too confused to take notes or ask questions, too bewildered to even think.... As he burned he never moved a muscle, never uttered a sound, his outward composure in sharp contrast to the wailing people around him."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work