• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Africans Americans gained legal civil rights between 1865 and 1870 through constitutional amendments and acts of Congress; however, in practice some of these rights did not materialise and by 1877 they were starting to lose what rights they had.To what ex

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Africans Americans gained legal civil rights between 1865 and 1870 through constitutional amendments and acts of Congress; however, in practice some of these rights did not materialise and by 1877 they were starting to lose what rights they had. To what extent do you agree with the above hypothesis? The beginning of African American civil rights is the abolition of slavery in 1865 and the amendments to the American Constitution which, in theory, ensured equality to the African American race. In practice many of their promised freedoms failed to last or didn't event happen, especially in the southern states. Many blacks faced segregation, discrimination and violence. In 1865, all slaves were emancipated by the Thirteenth Amendment. African Americans could now travel freely, and go to the North where there was less racism. They could also worship in their own churches, own their own properties and marry; therefore families could stay together (before families would be split up). ...read more.

Middle

Factors such as the Black Codes and the Grandfather Clause prevented blacks from being able to vote. To be able to vote you had to be able to read and write; many blacks were unable to do so as they didn't have any schools and weren't allowed at white peoples schools. Also, many blacks who were going to vote were often intimated by whites, including the KKK, and scared into not voting to prevent backlash. With the Grandfather Clause, a black man could only vote if his grandfather had voted but they had been slaves so hadn't been able to vote. Furthermore, the vote was only granted to black men, not black women. This amendment was more de jure than de facto. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 was a repeat of the Fourteenth Amendment, asserting that all other races, excluding Native Americans, were full citizens of the United States. However, many southern states didn't see it as a state right. ...read more.

Conclusion

This hindered the granting of civil rights to African Americans as it gave more power to the states. In US v Cruikshank (1876) the Supreme Court ruled that federal officers could only take action against states not individuals, when the officers arrested over a hundred white men after a riot in Louisiana which left seventy African Americans dead. This again showed the states had more power than the federal government. Therefore, they could ultimately take away the rights of blacks, especially in the South. Most black rights looked secure in theory (de jure), however many blacks didn't actually acquire those rights (de facto). The reality was different to the principle. Most civil rights for blacks remained theoretical. Many blacks were too intimated to exercise their rights. The hypothesis of black rights being materialised and deteriorating seems to be mostly true, due to the most rights being just de jure than de facto. Organisations such as the KKK seemed to make sure of this and the Republicans and the North were both beginning to lose interest in Blacks. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. South African Heritage - Where we come from?

    On the one hand you have a group of biology students who are determined to analyze the remains of the mystery people of Prestwich Place and on the other hand you have SAHRA and other people who are firmly against the idea.

  2. What was the short term significance of the Amritsar Massacre?

    The fact that people all over India who were previously isolated in the countryside had joined in a nationalist movement made the Indians feel that they were part of one nation. Therefore it could be argued that the Amritsar Massacre and the non-cooperation movement that followed led to the rise

  1. Why did more formal segregation of African Americans develop in the south after Reconstruction?

    The case set the precedent for other segregation cases, such as US v Cruikshank (1876). Furthermore, most African Americans didn't seem to be challenging the status quo. Some were intimidated by white Southerners and racist groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan, who frightened blacks against speaking out.

  2. The First English Civil War

    But the road to London now lay open and it was decided to take it. The intention was not to avoid a battle, for the Royalist generals wanted to fight Essex before he grew too strong, and the temper of both sides made it impossible to postpone the decision.

  1. Aboriginal Rights and Freedom

    This reduction was mainly a result of disease, murder and poor living conditions. From 1890 to 1911 all Australian states and territories (except Tasmania) passed their own Protection Acts that made Aboriginal people live in missions, away from towns. Under these acts, Aboriginal people were not allowed in places such

  2. How far and why did black Americans gain civil rights?

    However, King was imprisoned; therefore the needed development was halted. When King was released, he arranged another protest, which led to the police overreacting by using police dogs and water cannons on the protestors. The event was captured by the media and projected across the whole of America, via televisions.

  1. Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798

    The Kentucky Resolution also stated that the state was able to declare a law null and void. Their main purpose was to overthrow the influence and popularity of the Federalist Party by the 1800 elections. The two resolutions were examples of extreme anti-Federalism and support of states' rights, which naturally

  2. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    In June 1945, Clement Attlee was elected Labour Prime Minister, and had long been in favour of independence. This change in government and their attitude towards India would be crucial; because the promise of independence had been made, it was just a matter of when it would happen.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work