• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19

After the collapse of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the world started realizing a new ideology.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

After the collapse of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the world started realizing a new ideology. An ideology that witnessed the collapse of concepts that were taken for granted; an ideology that is faced with fear about the formation of the new world order. Before the September 11 attacks and during the post Cold war era, the world has seen no greater power than the United States. International Relations have seen the control and dominance of the United States over the world's structure. However, after the Twin Tower attacks, the world started realizing the role of other players inside the international arena, players that were preferably called as terrorists. September 11 questioned the validity of several theories that were formulated as soon as the end of the Cold War was announced, these theories were trying to predict the shape and attitude of the world as it entered a new era. It has always been known that every era in history adapts an indication that will mark it as distinctive, and therefore all of those theories were simple speculations on the nature of what could be such an indication. Theories valid, some predicted the rise of democracy and liberalism, others feared the return of barbarism and anarchy. Also, other theories predicted a clash that will divide the borders of the world according to culture, civilization, ethnicity, and most importantly religion. After September 11, the world has dramatically changed with terrorism as the key player. It is also very clear that terrorism is very powerful, as it was able to question the strength of the United States, and was able to reform the world order. Terrorism is the world's most fearful enemy, an enemy that is powerful, aggressive, and most importantly ambiguous. The fall of the Berlin Wall and the Second Gulf War marked the end of an era and the beginning of another, writers, scholars and political analysts, started to predict and foretell what they labeled the New World Order would require. ...read more.

Middle

present a report about terrorism concluding that it is the most dangerous form of "Asymmetric Warfare", and like Hughes, specialists also anticipated that terrorism will stand as the major global crime. In this report it was anticipated that the greatest danger that will face the international community is terrorism, which was not very new itself, yet what was very insightful is the conclusion that in the future it will take a new form for several reasons.25 First of all, according to the report, terrorism is no longer about an individual or a group of people who have secretly agreed to assassinate someone for vengeance or even for political reasons.26 Also it is no longer about groups who belong to certain Leftist or Rightist ideologies. As Heikal argues terrorism has transformed and adopted itself to the modern time and it now involves groups who are stretching all over the world, including elements who are fighting for a cause, or people who are suffering from poverty, social inequality or injustice and terrorism is simply the channel through which all these different elements express their suffering.27 This observation of course is very close to our earlier reference to "Non-Systemic Forces" and to Barber' idea of "Jihad" linking all three ideas by explaining how terrorism can be utilized by forces outside of the international system or marginalized by it in order to attack it as hard as possible. These thoughts or motivations of 'terrorist groups' are not the only features of terrorism that have changed or adapted to the modern or post-modern era, but also their methods. Technology has reached the terrorism arena, giving it strength and enabling it to reach places it previously could not reach.28 Not only this, but since globalization is the symptom of the new century, terrorism has also taken advantage of it. The globalization factor, as Heikal puts it has made world markets become very close to being like "spider nets", very interconnected, inter-related and endless29, which could help terrorists cause severer damages. ...read more.

Conclusion

"The Coming Anarchy." The Atlantic Monthly. February 1994. Vol 273. P 44-76. 12 Ibid 13 Ibid 14 Ibid 15 Ibid 16 Huntington, Samuel P. "The Clash of Civilizations?" Foreign Affairs. Summer 1993: 1. 17 Ibid. 18 Said, Edward W. "The Clash of Ignorance." The Nation. October 22, 2001. On the Internet at: http://www.angelfire.com/pe2/peaceproject/said.html 19 Ibid. 20 Ibid. 21 Kaplan, Robert D. "The Coming Anarchy." The Atlantic Monthly. February 1994. Vol 273. P 44-76. On the internet at: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/foreign/anarcf.htm 22 Clark, Staten. "The Evolution and Devolution of Terrorism; the Coming Challenge For Emergency and National Security Forces", Journal of Counter terrorism and Security International, Winter 1999 edition Vol.5, No.4, Pg 8-11, On the internet at: http://www.emergency.com/asymetric.htm p2 23 Hughes, Patrick M., "Global Threats And Challenges to the United States and its Interest Abroad," Defense Intelligence Agency, Feb. 5-6, 1997. 24 Marenches C, and D. Adelman, "The Fourth World War; Diplomacy and espionage in the Age of Terrorism," William Marrow and Company, p 30. 25 Heikal, Mohamed H. "Hareek Amreeky wa 'Alamy." Weghat Nazar. Vol 3. Issue 33. October 2001 26 Ibid 27 Ibid 28 Ibid 29 Ibid 30 Ibid 31 Clark, Staten. "The Evolution and Devolution of Terrorism; the Coming Challenge For Emergency and National Security Forces", Journal of Counterterrorism and Security International, Winter 1999 edition Vol.5, No.4, Pg 8-11, On the internet at: http://www.emergency.com/asymetric.htm p2 32 Ibid 33 Ibid 3 34 Chomskly, Naom, "The World After Sept. 11." AFSC Conference, Dec 2001. P2. On the internet at: http://zmag.org/chomskyafter911.htm 35 Fisk, Robert. "We are the War Criminals now." Independent. Nov 2001. On the internet at: http://www.zmag.org/fiskcrim.htm 36 Barber, Benjamin R., "Beyond Jihad Vs. Mcworld." The Nation , January 21, 2002 37 Ibid 38 Ibid 39 39 Smith, Steve. " The End of the Unipolar Moment: September 11 and the Future of World Order." Social Science Research Center, On the internet at: http://www.ssrc.org/sept11/essays/smith_text_only.htm 40 Ibid 3 41 Ibid 42 Choamsky, Naom, "The World After Sept. 11." AFSC Conference, Dec 2001. P2. On the internet at: http://zmag.org/chomskyafter911.htm 43 Little, David. "The World's Fight." Christian Century. Feb 2002. Vol 119 Issue 5 p22. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    war materiel, the decisive form of relief that Stalin sought was the actual involvement of American and British soldiers in Western Europe. Only such an invasion could significantly relieve the pressure of massive German divisions on the eastern front. During the years 1941-44, fewer than 10 percent of Germany's troops

  2. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    To say which one of these aspects played the major part in starting the cold war perhaps we should think of what could have prevented the cold war. As the World War II came to an end the three big poweres led by Franklin Roosevelt, Winston Churchill and Josef Stalin met in Yalta to compromise on a treaty.

  1. The Battle of the Atlantic.

    Often inexperienced crews could not operate as efficiently. In addition to this, experienced commanders, 'aces' such as G´┐Żnther Prien and the man who sunk more allied shipping than any other, the 'tonnage king', Otto Kretschmer were lost or captured. As well as losing valuable commanders and crews this also dented the German morale as the 'aces' were seen as heroes.

  2. In what way was World War 2 due to the failure of the victors ...

    Hitler, who started World War 2. The victors only realized that if Germany were democratized, war would be averted, but they did not realize the entire situation and tradition of Germany. Hence, it is the victors who are not capable of dealing with German problem started from unification that led to a rise of Hitler and eventually World War 2.

  1. American Culture Today.

    Lost colony of Roanoke was the first attempted settlement of America, but this colony is no longer in existence. Settled in the late sixteenth century, this colony consisted of 90 men, 17 women, and 9 children. Mustangs are American cars known for their speed and sleek look.

  2. Why did tsarism collapse?

    As stated earlier the political regime in Russia had changed with an elected parliament being established which had powers to pass legislation. While the first two Dumas failed, or were made to fail, as they were perceived to be too radical the third lasted its full term and the fourth nearly made the full term.

  1. Account for the tensions between the Islamic World and the West

    Orientalism accounts for one of the significant tensions between East and West. It has determined how Islam is portrayed, treated and perceived by Western states politically and socially. Orientalist discourse has fuelled and motivated the antagonistic foreign policies of Western states it has intensified and inspired Islamophobia.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Syrian shelling was merciless and it was reported that just about every building in east Beirut was hit, causalities were in the thousands. The Lebanese Forces fought back and even though the Syrians managed to break through into Ashrafieh, a Lebanese Forces counter attack ejected them with the Syrians taking heavy losses.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work