• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19

After the collapse of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the world started realizing a new ideology.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

After the collapse of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the world started realizing a new ideology. An ideology that witnessed the collapse of concepts that were taken for granted; an ideology that is faced with fear about the formation of the new world order. Before the September 11 attacks and during the post Cold war era, the world has seen no greater power than the United States. International Relations have seen the control and dominance of the United States over the world's structure. However, after the Twin Tower attacks, the world started realizing the role of other players inside the international arena, players that were preferably called as terrorists. September 11 questioned the validity of several theories that were formulated as soon as the end of the Cold War was announced, these theories were trying to predict the shape and attitude of the world as it entered a new era. It has always been known that every era in history adapts an indication that will mark it as distinctive, and therefore all of those theories were simple speculations on the nature of what could be such an indication. Theories valid, some predicted the rise of democracy and liberalism, others feared the return of barbarism and anarchy. Also, other theories predicted a clash that will divide the borders of the world according to culture, civilization, ethnicity, and most importantly religion. After September 11, the world has dramatically changed with terrorism as the key player. It is also very clear that terrorism is very powerful, as it was able to question the strength of the United States, and was able to reform the world order. Terrorism is the world's most fearful enemy, an enemy that is powerful, aggressive, and most importantly ambiguous. The fall of the Berlin Wall and the Second Gulf War marked the end of an era and the beginning of another, writers, scholars and political analysts, started to predict and foretell what they labeled the New World Order would require. ...read more.

Middle

present a report about terrorism concluding that it is the most dangerous form of "Asymmetric Warfare", and like Hughes, specialists also anticipated that terrorism will stand as the major global crime. In this report it was anticipated that the greatest danger that will face the international community is terrorism, which was not very new itself, yet what was very insightful is the conclusion that in the future it will take a new form for several reasons.25 First of all, according to the report, terrorism is no longer about an individual or a group of people who have secretly agreed to assassinate someone for vengeance or even for political reasons.26 Also it is no longer about groups who belong to certain Leftist or Rightist ideologies. As Heikal argues terrorism has transformed and adopted itself to the modern time and it now involves groups who are stretching all over the world, including elements who are fighting for a cause, or people who are suffering from poverty, social inequality or injustice and terrorism is simply the channel through which all these different elements express their suffering.27 This observation of course is very close to our earlier reference to "Non-Systemic Forces" and to Barber' idea of "Jihad" linking all three ideas by explaining how terrorism can be utilized by forces outside of the international system or marginalized by it in order to attack it as hard as possible. These thoughts or motivations of 'terrorist groups' are not the only features of terrorism that have changed or adapted to the modern or post-modern era, but also their methods. Technology has reached the terrorism arena, giving it strength and enabling it to reach places it previously could not reach.28 Not only this, but since globalization is the symptom of the new century, terrorism has also taken advantage of it. The globalization factor, as Heikal puts it has made world markets become very close to being like "spider nets", very interconnected, inter-related and endless29, which could help terrorists cause severer damages. ...read more.

Conclusion

"The Coming Anarchy." The Atlantic Monthly. February 1994. Vol 273. P 44-76. 12 Ibid 13 Ibid 14 Ibid 15 Ibid 16 Huntington, Samuel P. "The Clash of Civilizations?" Foreign Affairs. Summer 1993: 1. 17 Ibid. 18 Said, Edward W. "The Clash of Ignorance." The Nation. October 22, 2001. On the Internet at: http://www.angelfire.com/pe2/peaceproject/said.html 19 Ibid. 20 Ibid. 21 Kaplan, Robert D. "The Coming Anarchy." The Atlantic Monthly. February 1994. Vol 273. P 44-76. On the internet at: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/foreign/anarcf.htm 22 Clark, Staten. "The Evolution and Devolution of Terrorism; the Coming Challenge For Emergency and National Security Forces", Journal of Counter terrorism and Security International, Winter 1999 edition Vol.5, No.4, Pg 8-11, On the internet at: http://www.emergency.com/asymetric.htm p2 23 Hughes, Patrick M., "Global Threats And Challenges to the United States and its Interest Abroad," Defense Intelligence Agency, Feb. 5-6, 1997. 24 Marenches C, and D. Adelman, "The Fourth World War; Diplomacy and espionage in the Age of Terrorism," William Marrow and Company, p 30. 25 Heikal, Mohamed H. "Hareek Amreeky wa 'Alamy." Weghat Nazar. Vol 3. Issue 33. October 2001 26 Ibid 27 Ibid 28 Ibid 29 Ibid 30 Ibid 31 Clark, Staten. "The Evolution and Devolution of Terrorism; the Coming Challenge For Emergency and National Security Forces", Journal of Counterterrorism and Security International, Winter 1999 edition Vol.5, No.4, Pg 8-11, On the internet at: http://www.emergency.com/asymetric.htm p2 32 Ibid 33 Ibid 3 34 Chomskly, Naom, "The World After Sept. 11." AFSC Conference, Dec 2001. P2. On the internet at: http://zmag.org/chomskyafter911.htm 35 Fisk, Robert. "We are the War Criminals now." Independent. Nov 2001. On the internet at: http://www.zmag.org/fiskcrim.htm 36 Barber, Benjamin R., "Beyond Jihad Vs. Mcworld." The Nation , January 21, 2002 37 Ibid 38 Ibid 39 39 Smith, Steve. " The End of the Unipolar Moment: September 11 and the Future of World Order." Social Science Research Center, On the internet at: http://www.ssrc.org/sept11/essays/smith_text_only.htm 40 Ibid 3 41 Ibid 42 Choamsky, Naom, "The World After Sept. 11." AFSC Conference, Dec 2001. P2. On the internet at: http://zmag.org/chomskyafter911.htm 43 Little, David. "The World's Fight." Christian Century. Feb 2002. Vol 119 Issue 5 p22. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    Between 1960 and 1980 the expenses on arming "increased almost in 5 times" [1, p.339], although both sides had more than enough weapons to destroy whole world few tomes. About 1970's destructive force was approximately "in 1 million more than that two bombs which were thrown on Japan.

  2. Why did tsarism collapse?

    A balance had been struck between change and stability. The third and fourth Dumas helped to push the economic development of Russia forward. Russia was proceeding along lines of Western industrial development and without a war to put the economies in confusion a peaceful transition from autocratic agricultural society to modern constitutional democracy would have been possible.

  1. The Battle of the Atlantic.

    Another German weakness was the failure to fund sufficiently the development of the type XXI and XXIII U-boats. These were true submarines, with greatly superior underwater capabilities to those of the standard U-boat. Britain had developed the capabilities to deal with a standard U-boat but it is unlikely that they

  2. In what way was World War 2 due to the failure of the victors ...

    Hitler, who started World War 2. The victors only realized that if Germany were democratized, war would be averted, but they did not realize the entire situation and tradition of Germany. Hence, it is the victors who are not capable of dealing with German problem started from unification that led to a rise of Hitler and eventually World War 2.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    The central issue dividing the allies involved how much support the United States and Britain would offer to mitigate, then relieve, the devastation being sustained by the Soviet people. Stated bluntly, the Soviet Union bore the massive share of Nazi aggression.

  2. USA isolationism

    to keep out any left-wing influence in latin America, which might endanger their economic interests there. 4. FDR AND ISOLATIONISM 1933-38 * Little response to external aggression FDR was restricted in the 1930s to talking about ways in which the US could influence others to keep peace.

  1. Which of the following problems do you consider to have been the most serious ...

    This threatens the ideal that America is open to all. Intolerance towards Catholics and blacks was also a problem in the 1920s. Years after slavery of the blacks, the American population still had a prejudice against them. The black population were treated as inferior and childlike.

  2. Account for the tensions between the Islamic World and the West

    of civilisations' is a clear attack on Islam a bias account of Islamic and Arab culture. Huntington asserts that fundamentalism is synonymous with Islam; his thesis will have adverse effect on the ways in which policy makers, opinion shapers and governments view Islam.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work