• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Alexander II is sometimes called the Tsar Liberator. Is this an accurate interpretation of his reign?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Alexander II is sometimes called the Tsar Liberator. Is this an accurate interpretation of his reign? Serfdom was on the verge of being eliminated in Western Europe by 1848. However in comparison to Western Europe, Russia was the only European state yet to emancipate or attempt to emancipate its Serfs, this represented the backward nature of Russian society. However Serfdom was engraved in the Russian hierarchal society hence the reason for which serfdom was still present in Russia during the mid 19th century. Nevertheless by 1861 the emancipation statutes of the Serfs had finally been issued. How was it that despite there being hostility from the gentry and nobility to the destruction of Serfdom and the centrality of which Serfdom had in Russian society, was Emancipation of the Serfs able to occur in 1861. Did the emancipation of the Serfs take place due to Alexander II humanitarian concerns and sympathy towards Serfdom or was the emancipation of the Serfs an attempt for Russia to grow economically as well as politically in an attempt to retain its world status? These questions have been debated as many historians argue that the reasons for the Serfs being emancipated were due to economical, political, military and moral concerns. Russia during the mid 19th century was economical stagnated in comparison to countries such as Britain who saw a great economic boom through the industrial revolution, which consequently saw the boom of railways across Britain. ...read more.

Middle

It can be argued that the causation of the Serfs being liberated by Tsar Alexander II were to with economic, political, military and moral concerns. Nevertheless the idea of Tsar Nicholas II being labelled as a Tsar Liberator is strongly debated. In order for someone to be known or portrayed as a Liberator, they must give freedom to a person/group. The freedom received by the Serfs many feel left them worse off. Despite this so called Liberation of the Serfs occurring it was not the Serfs who were benefiting but more so the landlords.5 This was the case as the statues proposed that through emancipation of the Serfs, the Serfs were able to buy the land they worked on by paying redemptions over 49 years at an interest rate of 6%. The land, which they received, was usually narrow strips of poor land, which was not very fertile. 6 It is significant to take into account that despite the fact the Serfs were given personal freedom, they were not free in the sense that they were initially paid a very small amount for their work. Hence the Serfs were naturally financially instable; therefore it was ironic that such interest was placed on their land as they were not able to pay off their 49-year redemption including the interest placed on their land. As a result many Serfs found themselves in a worse off situation to the extent where their children were brought up on the burden of having to pay off the excess (and not achievable) ...read more.

Conclusion

Moreover it can be argued that in America the black slaves evidently witnessed a better life (despite it taking several years) whereas the Serfs were witnessing a worse life hence it was the consequences of the liberation of the Serfs which caused Alexander II's Liberator label to be questioned. Overall despite the Serfs receiving no genuine liberty11 one can argue that liberation did occur in the sense that an individual no longer owned the Serfs. However the extent of liberation is questioned by the situation of which the Serfs were left in as a consequence of emaciation. Russia had promised to give a new dawn to the Serfs but then left them in darkness.12 Nevertheless historians such as Terence Emmons describe Alexander II and the reforms as "probably the greatest single piece of state directed engineering in modern European history before the twentieth century.13 In conclusion I believe that despite Liberation was given on a general basis to the Serfs the way in which Liberation was given to them put the Serfs back to their social hierarchy in society as the benefit which occurred from the Liberation were very minimal and instead of making the Serfs better off caused them to become worse off. Hence it is a bit optimistic to call Alexander II a Tsar Liberator when infact his intentions for liberating the Serfs were more to do with pragmatic concern regarding Russia's economy, military and world status, than they were to do with giving the Serfs genuine liberty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917?

    Kerensky wanted Kornilov to resign, but on the 27th of August, after being asked to resign by Kerensky, Kornilov ordered his troops to advance and seize the capital. The Bolsheviks were at great threat of being attacked by Kornilov's men, and began merging with the Mensheviks and Socialist Revolutionaries to

  2. Which of these judgements best Reflects the State of Imperial Russia in 1914? By ...

    The programme proposed by the Kadets was not a radical one, which risked undermining Nicholas' autocracy, and it was his obstinate disregard for the creation of better conditions for his people that made him seem like an isolated and uncaring ruler.

  1. The First English Civil War

    Essex's men knew that evening that they would have to break through by force, there being no suggestion of surrender. First Battle of Newbury, September 20, 1643 The ground was densely intersected by hedges, except in front of the Royalists' left centre (Newbury Wash)

  2. The structures of the Soviet State were created by Lenin and abused by Stalin. ...

    or even of Stalin's own plans, but a desperate response to the social disaster Stalin's regime created after 1929. In conclusion, there were certainly links between Leninism and Stalinism, but that doesn't mean to say Leninism caused Stalinism. Lenin's authoritarian side - the elite role of the party, strict discipline,

  1. Assess the Reign of Amenhotep III

    Influences of Aten were starting to feature prominently as religious symbolism, such as the replacing of the neb glyph/ traditional depiction of the solar boat with new iconography and epithets on royal regalia; and adding Aten to names of buildings, royal barges and even his daughter, Bakenaten.

  2. Consider David Starkey(TM)s and Francis Pryor(TM)s respective versions of the nature and extent of ...

    Britons began by German Mercenaries (Henson places this 13 years earlier due to the difference between the calendars in use by Gildas). The continuing fight is the second stage spanning from the start of the rebellion in 440 to the Battle of Badon in around 500.

  1. Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing ...

    aimed to improve living standards and the second (1933-37) and third (1938-41) aimed to highlight and thus, amend, Russia?s weaknesses[24]. Industrialisation was relatively successful as by the late 1930?s many workers conditions had improved and they had acquired better paid jobs and unemployment was almost non-existent. Accounts from the time support this view: ?Good progress was made?4?500 new factories,

  2. The events in India in 1856/7 were caused by the issue of the new ...

    their grasp on India after the mutiny and were replaced by the British Raj. One of the main reforms which aggravated the Indian people was the change in the revenue system and rules on taxation. ?Taxation was more rigorously enforced; it took time foe winners to emerge in this situation? Peter Marshall: British India and the ?Great rebellion?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work