• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Alexander II transformed the lives of the peasants" How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?Alexander II transformed the lives of the peasants? How far do you agree with this view? Alexander II did introduce a number of reforms in terms of changing the lives of the serfs, which were quite revolutionary for that period of time. The serfs were a big aspect of Russia?s life as they made up approximately 90% of the population and it was in Alexander?s interest to modernise Russia and with this idea in mind he introduced the Emancipation Edict of 1861 which was, in essence, supposed to be a dramatic change and thus would mean agreeing with the statement. However, to say that Alexander transformed the lives of the peasants, that is to say he completely changed the lives of the peasants, is rather inaccurate and it could be argued that, although many aspects were reformed and dealt with, peasants were living in similar conditions from the beginning of the period to the end. Economically, there were times in the period of Alexander II?s reign that the peasants? lives did improve with the economic liberal Minister of Finance Michael Reutern who increased awareness of the government to promote economic development actively. ...read more.

Middle

Basically, the peasantry went from being under control from the landlords to the harsh hands of the Mir who made sure no peasant could emigrate unless all payments were made. Therefore, it seems clear that economically the peasants underwent no transformation as they shifted from one restriction to another, from the landlords to the Mir. A transformation to the peasants? lives was completely restricted by the Mir. It could be argued that, socially, Alexander II succeeded in transforming the lives of the peasants by abolishing serfdom and making the peasants genuine Russian citizens. They were now free and allowed to marry whomever they wished and were given decent civil rights: they were no longer ?owned souls? but normal people able to reach a better standard of living and this is evident with the kulak class who were a class of richer peasants. Education was also improved under Alexander II who realised the need for the serfs to be educated in order to fully achieve modernisation. On average, peasants farmed 20% less land than before Emancipation and they were also given a portion of arable land. ...read more.

Conclusion

There was a genuine lack of political freedom and since the peasants weren?t really being seen as equals and being exploited, there perhaps was no intention to create their representation anyway. It is clear to see that Alexander II was firm on keeping his autocratic powers and therefore, as a result, politically, there was hardly a transformation to the lives of the peasants. While there was a focus on industrialising and modernising Russia, and even though there were attempts at changing the lives of the peasants in order to so, it is evident to see that the peasants' lives were quite unchanged. In terms of economically and even socially, it seemed that the peasants had exchanged one master (the landlord) for another (the Mir) and no real freedom was given since redemption payments seemed to be more of a trap than a liberation as landlords could not bear to lose power. In essence, peasants, although having rid themselves of the title ?owned souls?, were not free and even though there were minor changes to the system of serfdom, a transformation was not achieved under Alexander II and therefore would mean to disagree with the statement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    The peasantry were still effectively serfs who were being used for the benefit of industry, this was an important feature of war communism and similarly in the 'dekulakisation' of Stalin, as in both cases the peasantry had falsely been accused of hoarding.

  2. How successful was Alexander II in transforming Russian Society

    A hugely important reform was economic. After the defeat in the Crimean war, Russia needed to earn back worldwide respect.

  1. How far was the death of Alexander II a turning point in the development ...

    the peasants was increased by the appointment of the land captains and a law making violation of contracts between landlords and a tenants criminal act. In addition to reversing the Laws which were introduced by his father, in order to strengthen the idea of Russification, the electorate was reduced, for

  2. Alexander II did little to really improve the lives of the Russian people

    only those who paid trade taxes or were on the property register were granted the vote, obviously meaning that the poor peasants (who made up the vast majority of the population) who couldn't pay the trade taxes or own property, were not granted the right to vote, thereby dismissing their

  1. How well does Alexander II deserve his reputation as The Tsar Liberator(TM)?

    instructed land owners to exhaust serfs before the announcement of the emancipation edict; why else would this instruction have been made unless Alexander knew that the edict would not actually improve the quality of life for the serfs? Not only did the reforms not go far enough Alexander adopted a

  2. 'Alexander III was the most successful Tsar in the period 1855-1917'. How far do ...

    In addition, the victory against the Ottomans in the Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878, only served to show that there had been progress; however given that the Ottoman empire was in decline, it cannot necessarily be taken as proof that the Russian army was particularly powerful.

  1. What were the mains reasons for the emancipation of Serfs in Russia?

    However, their importance can be exaggerated: it is too much to speak of a revolutionary peasant movement in these years. The riots were not big enough to threaten the fabric of the state. The sentence that Alexander II used in a speech of 1858: ?It is better to abolish

  2. How effectively did Alexander II cope with the problems he faced on his succession?

    Furthermore the advances made under Reuterns were short term, and still minimal in comparison to the western superpowers economies, the very nations Russia was looking to compete with. The issue of serfs also extended to a military level as well as economic, leading onto the next problem that Alexander faced his outmoded military.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work