• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"America went to war over Vietnam in 1965 in order to uphold her credibility as a Great Power" How far do you agree with this judgement?

Extracts from this document...


"America went to war over Vietnam in 1965 in order to uphold her credibility as a Great Power" How far do you agree with this judgement? The upholding of her status as a Great Power was part of the reason for the war but it is fairly subsidiary in light of some of the other factors pushing Johnson at this time. The issue of credibility was on America's mind given the way the cold war had gone during much of the 50's particularly with the faith of her allies being something particularly important to her, credibility was something key to who was seen to be winning the cold war at that stage but it is a long way from being essential. Instead there were much more pressing factors on Johnson's administration than just the great power credibility, such factors included Johnson's own background, the general cold war assumptions and attitudes such as set ideas like the domino theory being ever present on any governments mind. Kennedy's legacy was also something which helped push America into war along with his advisers and Johnson's conundrum with his plans for reform via the "Great Society". There were also factors within Vietnam itself such as the failure of Diem and the other 9 prime ministers who had come and gone since his execution, the ever-aggressive north and the losing of the hearts and minds of the people. ...read more.


Of course one of these assumptions was the one of Americas credibility as a great power but there were others. The cold war was seen as a struggle against monolithic communist bloc intent upon subverting free and independent states and spreading Soviet power under the guise of communism. Actions by all communist parties and regimes were determined in Moscow. Values of communism ran totally counter to those of capitalistic America and the free world in the West, the USSR policy of world domination was something the US had to stop in order to stop such values being spread throughout the world. The way to stop it was through pro-active policies throughout the world by supporting pro-western regimes against communist infiltration through financial, diplomatic and if needs be military support. The communist threat was similar to the fascist threat back in the 1930's and the mistakes of then could not be repeated. Force had to be met with force. Negotiated agreements were useless unless they were based on ones military superiority or after a victory in a war. Along with these regular woes faced by all the presidents though there was also Johnson's own worry about the implementation of his "great society", which is where his heart truly was. ...read more.


Rusk was also growing tired of the South Vietnamese with a consensus among the advisers that something had to be done about the situation. By spring 64, US intelligence estimated South Vietnam would stand for about a few months at best. Political instability was ubiquitous with 6 changes in government. The countryside was communist controlled with towns becoming fortresses under siege. The loss of Diem had created a huge political vacuum. General Minh took over from Diem in 63 but he had no experience, programme or support and South Vietnam continued to deteriorate. The January coup in 64 was motivated simply by personal ambition rather then a sense of public ambition continuing the perpetual down spiral with anarchy taking rule. Not only was the regime in constant crisis but also there was an intensification in communist military activity with Hanoi pledging to destroy the South Vietnamese army, destroy the hamlets and engage in an offensive to destroy the government in December 1963. This caused an expansion in numbers and quality of the Vietcong troops, greater infiltration and a campaign in South Vietnam to be run by a top North Vietnam General. The Vietcong were striking at will against Americans in South Vietnam with a US air base near Saigon greatly damaged in November 1964. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. America In Vietnam, 1953-73

    Asia and passed laws which forced the withdrawal of America from the region. 1965 August 7, congress passed the South East Asia resolution granting Johnson considerable power to "take all necessary measures to repel any armed attacks against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression".

  2. Post-Cold War Realities

    interests as well as support for the re-imposition of hegemony in its traditional sphere of influence. Both sides also realized that their cooperation could provide the mutual benefit of countering emerging Western influence. The next section will briefly examine the decisive effects of the end of the Cold War on the Russo-Iranian relationship.

  1. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    set a precedent which will awaken hope in the hearts of the Muslims of the possibility of achieving their union even by force once they are freed from the yoke of Kufr and once they establish the Khilafah. The operation in Kuwait resulted in the capitulation of the Kuwaiti ruling family, together with the rest of the Gulf rulers.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Convergence fire had been used so that the impacts would be concentrated in the target area. Regrettably, a few rounds had overshot and hit the United Nations compound. " A UN team questioned a number of witnesses on the activities of Hezbollah fighters in Qana prior to the incident.

  1. Source A is an extract from a book written by John F Kennedy, before ...

    The result was that huge massacres occurred which, for the most part, just resulted in a massive loss of innocent life. It is not surprising, that the US army were unsupported, and in some cases, even hated, by the native population.

  2. Gorbachev(TM)s reforms and policies, which were intended originally to strengthen the Soviet system, eventually ...

    Each of them had their own self-vested interest and fought for their rights and privileges to be protected, thus resulting in the widespread upsurge of communal conflicts. This happened in Azerbaijan where the Armenian people resented being ruled by the Muslims and asked to become part of the republic of Armenia, but the Gorbachev government refused.

  1. Mao was essentially more successful in his domestic policies for China, then he was ...

    But Mao had done a major mistake. His hope was totally reversed, the people were complaining more and more and Mao was even afraid of loosing his power, so he reversed everything. "Let a hundred flowers bloom, a hundred schools of thought contend" was not heard again, and here it

  2. Why were the Communists able to come to power in China?

    He also allied with the landlords and the warlords making the concept of People's Livelihood a policy no longer profitable or even possible to be pursued. This was because the landlords and the warlords were cruelly taking advantage of the people, making their life miserable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work