• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"America went to war over Vietnam in 1965 in order to uphold her credibility as a Great Power" How far do you agree with this judgement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"America went to war over Vietnam in 1965 in order to uphold her credibility as a Great Power" How far do you agree with this judgement? The upholding of her status as a Great Power was part of the reason for the war but it is fairly subsidiary in light of some of the other factors pushing Johnson at this time. The issue of credibility was on America's mind given the way the cold war had gone during much of the 50's particularly with the faith of her allies being something particularly important to her, credibility was something key to who was seen to be winning the cold war at that stage but it is a long way from being essential. Instead there were much more pressing factors on Johnson's administration than just the great power credibility, such factors included Johnson's own background, the general cold war assumptions and attitudes such as set ideas like the domino theory being ever present on any governments mind. Kennedy's legacy was also something which helped push America into war along with his advisers and Johnson's conundrum with his plans for reform via the "Great Society". There were also factors within Vietnam itself such as the failure of Diem and the other 9 prime ministers who had come and gone since his execution, the ever-aggressive north and the losing of the hearts and minds of the people. ...read more.

Middle

Of course one of these assumptions was the one of Americas credibility as a great power but there were others. The cold war was seen as a struggle against monolithic communist bloc intent upon subverting free and independent states and spreading Soviet power under the guise of communism. Actions by all communist parties and regimes were determined in Moscow. Values of communism ran totally counter to those of capitalistic America and the free world in the West, the USSR policy of world domination was something the US had to stop in order to stop such values being spread throughout the world. The way to stop it was through pro-active policies throughout the world by supporting pro-western regimes against communist infiltration through financial, diplomatic and if needs be military support. The communist threat was similar to the fascist threat back in the 1930's and the mistakes of then could not be repeated. Force had to be met with force. Negotiated agreements were useless unless they were based on ones military superiority or after a victory in a war. Along with these regular woes faced by all the presidents though there was also Johnson's own worry about the implementation of his "great society", which is where his heart truly was. ...read more.

Conclusion

Rusk was also growing tired of the South Vietnamese with a consensus among the advisers that something had to be done about the situation. By spring 64, US intelligence estimated South Vietnam would stand for about a few months at best. Political instability was ubiquitous with 6 changes in government. The countryside was communist controlled with towns becoming fortresses under siege. The loss of Diem had created a huge political vacuum. General Minh took over from Diem in 63 but he had no experience, programme or support and South Vietnam continued to deteriorate. The January coup in 64 was motivated simply by personal ambition rather then a sense of public ambition continuing the perpetual down spiral with anarchy taking rule. Not only was the regime in constant crisis but also there was an intensification in communist military activity with Hanoi pledging to destroy the South Vietnamese army, destroy the hamlets and engage in an offensive to destroy the government in December 1963. This caused an expansion in numbers and quality of the Vietcong troops, greater infiltration and a campaign in South Vietnam to be run by a top North Vietnam General. The Vietcong were striking at will against Americans in South Vietnam with a US air base near Saigon greatly damaged in November 1964. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    help of Iraq and Iran in consolidating the dominance of America over the rest of the Gulf States. Saddam Hussain has played, and still plays, a very ugly role in this policy through maintaining the embargo over his own country and starving his own subjects and depriving them from the basic needs of sustenance.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The prosecution in the case holds Sharon directly responsible for 1982 massacre in Sabra and Shatilla. Although Hobeika's lasting claim to notoriety was his during the 1982 massacre, in July 2001, Hobeika broke his characteristic silence over the Sabra and Shatila massacre to plead innocent of any involvement, claiming to

  1. Post-Cold War Realities

    From Iran?s viewpoint, a new, less powerful Russia would be able to solve many of its military, economic and industrial needs and cooperation in these areas could assist its aspiration to extend Iranian influence throughout the newly independent states. From the other side, Iran held distinct opportunities for Russia?s economic

  2. Gorbachev(TM)s reforms and policies, which were intended originally to strengthen the Soviet system, eventually ...

    This led to several years of fighting between the ethnic groups and also between the two republics. Once this "Pandora's box" had been opened, nationalist movements emerged in Georgia, Ukraine, Moldova, Byelorussia, and the Central Asian republics. Moscow was unable to these instances of political unrest which weakened the power of the Central Government.

  1. A New America: History of America's Escape from England

    Jefferson argued that Britain's situation gave the United States an opportunity to secure concessions in return for American neutrality; and several issues stemming from the 1783 Treaty of Paris needed settling. The British had never evacuated heir posts in the Northwest, and westerners suspected the British of using those bases to provoke Indian attacks on the American frontier.

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    and prohibited loans to belligerents and the travel of Americans on ships owned by belligerents. Congress thus hoped to prevent involvements like those of 1914-17. A WORLD POWER The spirit of isolationism eroded steadily as Americans watched the aggressive moves of Adolf Hitler and his allies.

  1. "Both 'The Deer Hunter' and 'Apocalypse Now' are less interested in capturing the historical ...

    Kurtz is a good example that, although choice and free-will are the building blocks of mankind, making the wrong choices can also corrupt mankind. 'Apocalypse Now', it is shown to us that absolute power corrupts absolutely. 'Apocalypse Now' gets across to its viewers how little the some of the American soldiers care about other human beings.

  2. The Not So Free.

    He walked into a small civilian looking building. The KGB leader Yury Andropov would be there "What have you got" Shouts as if in a grumpy mood, the Russian KGB leader Yury Andropov typically his style, "And you are Yury Andropov I presume" "My name does not matter what information

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work