• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An Era of Liberalism or an era of false liberalism, which is the most accurate description of Tsar King Alexander II's time in power?

Extracts from this document...


An Era of Liberalism or an era of false liberalism, which is the most accurate description of Tsar King Alexander II's time in power? To a certain extent, Tsar King Alexander II was a false liberator, however from closer examination, it is not clear cut and there are strong arguments to suggest the contrary. The reasons for the view that Alexander was a false liberator are that firstly, the Crimean war saw Britain, France and Turkey dealt an unexpected and resounding defeat to Russia, who until then was regarded as a superpower. This therefore made change and reform inevitable? Secondly, his reforms were limited in scope and therefore did not reform all that was needed to be. Thirdly, and most importantly for the side for false liberation is the fact that Alexander was simply trying to pacify his people. The main points for Alexander being a liberator are that he made his reforms for genuine reasons; he wanted to bring Russia inline with the rest of Western Europe. Secondly His reforms were far reaching and he did reform as much as he could under difficult circumstances. ...read more.


If the Crimean war hadn't have taken place many historians believe that the reforms would have occurred anyway, Russia would have been crippled if it hadn't and no matter how right wing one is, if change is the only way to survive, then change will take place. Alexander knew that an educated people are a more advanced people, and this is why he relaxed censorship, and allowed papers to publish what they wanted. This allowed people to know the truth and decide what they want, not what the government wanted to let people know. He was also a where that reform was needed in industry, and during his reign as Tsar, Russia's economy grew by four percent , due to reforms in industry. Alexander's reforms were far reaching, he didn't reform just the lower class, and he passes the Universal military act which meant the all men (including the nobility and church) had to perform military service. This was not popular with the upper classes as they did not want their sons to be in danger. This is an example of the Tsar not passing reforms to 'pacify the people' and it shows his reforms reached even the upper classes of Russia. ...read more.


In conclusion for the answer of whether Tsar Alexander's time in power can be classed as an era of liberalism or false liberalism, it can be argued for, against or some people say neither one or the other, it is not an open shut case, however the main argument is for an era, neither of liberalism nor false liberalism. Although Tsar Alexander made many reforms it is clear that he made the pre 1866 reforms were for the good of Russia and the upper class, and post 1866 the reforms were for the lower classes but were still beneficial to Russia. Alexander tried desperately to catch up with Western European countries economically, socially and politically, some were liberal some were falsely liberalizing, although it could be argued although the emancipation of the serfs looks like false liberalism it was to keep Russia right wing and under control so it could also be seen as a cleaver ploy by Alexander to keep the masses happy, this was a mistake and he paid with an attempt on his life, there after he did not try false liberalism again. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ' Did Alexander II deserve the title Tsar Liberator

    5 star(s)

    People were more open-minded and became to demand more under these 'liberal' reforms. Though Czar Alexander II returned to reactionary rule when an attempt was made to assassinate him in the 1860s, he did turn once more to reform in 1880.

  2. Witchcraft in the Elizabethan era.

    Elizabeth and others conformed to Mary's demands, whilst secretly plotting to restore Protestantism to England. Mary had Elizabeth arrested and imprisoned in the Tower of London after the rebellion led by Sir Thomas Wyatt in January 1554. Her imprisonment was followed by a year under house arrest at Woodstock, Oxfordshire.

  1. Meddling and troublesome(TM)- how accurate a description is this of Elizabeth I(TM)s parliaments?

    any of her Privy council or MPs), and they sent Elizabeth a petition regarding marriage and succession. Their attempt to persuade her into marriage was not met with any desire for discussion. Her reply was "At present it is not convenient; nor shall be without some peril unto you and certain danger unto me".

  2. Resistance to slavery.

    However the maroons could not be subdued and both parties were forced to sign a peace treaty in 1739. The Treaty of Pacification that gave the Marrons their freedom and the possession of 600 hectares of land and in return they should not take in any runaway slaves, not attack

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    In spite of the fact that Alexander?s father had been aware of this issue, and been theoretically in favour of emancipation and reform of the Russian social system, he had clearly lacked the political conviction to do anything to tackle the issues.

  2. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    of his own power'.44 This referencing demonstrates again Henry II brilliance for establishing reforms as being yet another example whereby he further weakened the traditional feudal ties in strategically superior manner because Henry knew that by strengthening his position he could then implement and formalise the jurisdiction of the 'General

  1. Reasons for Reform - Russia, Alexander II.

    * Peasants no longer owned by landlords. * Free to marry, trade, work where they pleased * No longer forced to work for the landlords. Compensation * Landlords were compensated for loss of their land by the government.

  2. How far do you agree that Alexander II brought successful reform to Russia?

    But in writing, the reform sounds successful but it also had its limitations. Taxes were put upon the serfs which amounted to large sums of money, obviously though most of them could not afford to pay the redemption fee and so had to remained attached to the 'Mir' and work to pay off their debts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work