• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse the causes of the 1848 revolution in France.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Analyse the causes of the 1848 revolution in France. With the ascension of Louis-Phillipe to the throne in July 1830, after the abdication of Charles X he appeared to have many factors in his favour that would seem to warrant a successful monarch and long standing regime. However, after 14 years the monarch, Louis-Phillipe, felt forced into a position where he had to abdicate, why then did the regime collapse so suddenly and unexpectedly? Especially after it had overcome so many early difficulties to establish itself in the minds of the French as an acceptable form of government. I believe the answer lies in a number of factor/causes. Long Term Causes Notably, one of the greatest weaknesses of the monarchy was the fact that Louis-Phillipe could claim no right to the throne of France. The French Tradition concerning the crown was that of heredity right, and had occurred so for centuries, being based, it was claimed, on the will of God. Therefore, although disliked no one could dispute the right of the Bourbons to occupy the throne of France. Louis-Phillipe had no such divine right as there was no belief that the legitimate monarch should be replaced by one of his relatives if he became unpopular. ...read more.

Middle

which disappointed his subjects and in the scenario where he did become active he adopted positions that led to even more humiliation than inactivity would have bestowed. Another aspect of Louis-Phillipe's reign that could of led to his downfall can be rooted in his domestic policy. Again here inactivity was favoured by the king. Once the regime was established and certain basic rules changed to the kings liking the king's view was that everything was working well so there was no use in tampering with it. Almost, that the system was beyond improvement. Unfortunately for the king, this was not a widely shared view. The main bone of discontent was concerning the current voting system. Many hankered for a reform especially as there was emerging a new class, a group of men who considered themselves to be part of the social elite and yet who didn't have the right to vote. Their cause was championed by the Legislative assembly (with Thiers an ardent supporter) a situation which made life more difficult for the king and his government. Another reason for the eventual collapse of the July monarchy can be traced back to the actual person of the king. ...read more.

Conclusion

on a par also with the backdrop of economic depression and social consciousness that was concurrent at the time however the questions still remains whether these on their own would have been enough to make a successful revolution and if whether the king had acted correctly and strongly, he would not have fallen It seems it was the kings inactivity that pervaded every part of his professional and personal life (foreign and domestic policy, personality and lifestyle and ultimately in the last days leading up to his abdication) that eventually led to his downfall. (Felt that this wasn't a satisfactory conclusion, found it hard to articulate here, how could I improve it, there seemed to be so many possibilities) Use ready made alternative forms of govment in conclusion to show why fist point was important. Domestic policy - if their had been an electorate reform the regime would have won the cative support of the 'new group' Personality- he was lifestyle- they Hort term- Louis-Phillipes lack of stubbornessdismayed his supporters who say this as an indication that the end was near and nobody wants to support a lost acuse . Louis-Phillipe was still in the position to use the army and stand strong but the lack of support shown by the National Guard seemed to have b Louis-Phillipe ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    'Nothing's Changed' is a far more angry poem. Whereas the girl in the first poem is able to make a change to the way she is treated, the second poem seems to suggest that although things have changed politically, society is still divided. Only it it's money which divides people up now and not just colour.

  2. Industrial Revolution

    "This was the period when Britain enjoyed to the full the economic benefits of having become 'the workshop of the world.' Her total exports in 1850 were worth �71 000 000, in 1870 they were worth nearly �200 000 000.

  1. What were the causes of the French Revolution? The French Revolution began due to ...

    They had to pay taxes. This was very unfair and as a result of the heavy burden of taxes, some peasants had a very poor standard of life. For example, the majority of workers in the towns lived in crowded and unsanitary tenements. I believe this inequality and injustice is an important factor, which caused the French Revolution.

  2. "Above all, the government feared a re-enactment of the French revolution on British soil" ...

    William Cobbett was basically an informer of the poor. He and Henry Hunt where well established public speakers and connected very well with the working classes but they had no plans to lead a revolution. They simply informed the working classes on their rights and how they were not being met.

  1. How likely was Italian Unification before 1848?

    He did not want a true unification of the Italian states but his suggestion centred upon a loose federation under the chair of the Pope who carried huge religious power in the devout Roman Catholic countries. Pope Pius IX appeared amazingly liberal; within his first years as Pope he released 2000 political and revolutionary prisoners from Papal State jails.

  2. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    they worried her assertion might be perceived as an indication of a betrayal to the agreement.36 Several scholars believe that Joan of Arc would have been successful at Paris had she been given a sufficient amount of time and support.

  1. Why Did Revolution Erupt in 1789? There were many causes of the French Revolution

    which meant he obviously didn't look like much of a leader- and wouldn't really inspire much in his people. One of the other things that made Louis look bad was his wife- Marie Antoinette. She was supposed to make the royal family look good, to promote them- but she really didn't.

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    * 2) The NUWSS dropped its opposition to allying with a political party and formed an election pact with Labour. This meant that they raised a special fund and designated election organisers to help Labour MPs retain their seats and assisted Labour candidates were the sitting Liberal MP was anti-female suffrage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work