• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse the Reasons for Bolivar's Failure to Unite the Countries He Liberated

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Analyse the Reasons for Bolivar's Failure to Unite the Countries He Liberated By Name: Dahlia Grosvenor Tutor: Prof. Mayo Date: 2004-10-25 Department of History Simon Bolivar, often referred to as 'the Liberator', was directly responsible for the freedom of many of the Latin American states. His dream for the future of the newly liberated states was to become a great confederation, to become a united body. He believed that his popularity as liberator would make it easier to impress his ideas upon the peoples and obtain their support of his grand scheme. Unfortunately for Bolivar, there were to be many disheartening realities that he could no longer avoid, which would result in the failure of his dreams. It was Bolivar's hope and ambition to unite the South American republics into a strong confederation. To this end, the congress that met at Panama in 1827 was to be a union to counteract the influence of the Holy Alliance and defend against the principles of hegemony, which were beginning to be outlined by the United States. It was he who set in motion the objective of establishing an international code for the Latin American Republics. The example of Napoleon led him into acts too arbitrary and a policy too autocratic to please the independent temper of his compatriots. Bolivar was not as successful as a political leader as he was as a General. ...read more.

Middle

He then planned to unite all the countries of the South into a Federation of the Andes, with himself as president and with the Bolivian constitution as the permanent basis of government. In 1815, even Bolivar, himself, comments on the difficult nature of controlling such a vast territory. "A state too extensive, either in itself, or on account of its dependencies, finally falls into decadence and converts its free form of government into tyranny, weakening the principles which should preserve it and finally relapsing into a despotism.... A large monarchy is hard to consolidate and a large republic is impossible."1 However, he still tries a decade later to do the impossible; failure was inevitable. Geographical problems were furthermore accentuated by the individualism of race and national differences. Each nation was different and there was much conflict between the states. Yet he expected that the states all come together under one flag, one army and be one nation under one constitution. He expected Colombia, Peru and Bolivia to come together under the Bolivian constitution, which would cause for rivalries between the Colombians and the Peruvians to arise. With a federation this large, it would inadvertently bring out the predominance of one section over the others. With the many conflicting differences among each other, it would be impossible for one country to submit itself to another. ...read more.

Conclusion

Unfortunately, Bolivar was hundreds of miles away from Bogot´┐Ż when he learned of their plans. At this time, the Venezuelans, under Paez, used this monarchical proposition as a pretext for their own rebellion. Paez decided to go ahead with his plans as he realized also that Bolivar was ill and far away. A new congress elected in 1830 accepted the secession of Venezuela and, soon thereafter, of Ecuador. Bolivar finally realized that his goal was unattainable and was harshly confirmed when he was exiled form his own country. In conclusion, one realises that there were a varying number of factors that contributed to Bolivar's failure to unite the Latin American States. These reasons however branch off of two specific factors. Firstly, Bolivar refused to accept the states' newfound nationalism as a strong and important factor, to understand the differences among the states. This showed in the elites' unwillingness to accept Bolivar's grand plans for their independent nations. Secondly, Bolivar, against his earlier judgement attempted to manage a republic over too vast a geographical area. As he could not be everywhere at once, his large republic became increasingly difficult to maintain. Eventually this led to individuals acting freely in his absence. Though Bolivar was quite a humble gentleman, he allowed those around him to persuade him that his popularity as 'liberator' would allow him to be successful in his plans. 1 Belaunde, Victor A. Bolivar and the Political Thought of the Spanish American Revolution, 1967. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Dunkirk - A success or failure?

    mission; however it loses some validity as it was written 25 years after the event undertook.

  2. Discuss the subplot to the film "The Three Kings", comment and analyse on the ...

    For example, near to the beginning of the film, when we are shown the American base camp, which, incidentally, appears to be more like Muscle Beach in America, rather than a military establishment in Iraq. This implies that the Americans are not there to help, but for their own self-satisfaction.

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    The expansion of slavery was the most fateful event of the pre- Revolutionary years. Virginia had only about 16,000 slaves in 1700; by 1770 it held more than 187,000, or almost half the population of the colony. In low country South Carolina, with its rice and indigo plantations, only 25,000

  2. From rebellion through rivalries to reformation

    But, just as Powell himself was ostracized by "mainstream" politicians, so were Skinheads. Until the National Front, which came into existence during the Seventies to combat immigration, began to receive Skinheads and elevate them in its ranks. In fact, usually "prim and proper" party-functions began to be dotted with flight-jackets,

  1. History of the United States

    From 1815 to 1850 a new western state entered the Union, on the average, every two and one-half years. The westward movement of the FRONTIER was matched in the Northeast by rapid economic development. National productivity surged during the 1820s; prices spurted to a peak during the 1830s and dropped

  2. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    The Americans did not officially inform Stalin, but in any event it is likely he was aware of the bomb from his spies (mainly within British Intelligence); nonetheless, it is debatable if Stalin actually understood the awesome power of nuclear weapons at that stage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work