• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyze the claim that Mussolini's successful rise to power by 1922 was largely a consequence of the impact of the First World

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Analyze the claim that Mussolini's successful rise to power by 1922 was largely a consequence of the impact of the First World War. Without a doubt, the role of the First World War in Mussolini's spectacular rise to power between 1920 and 1922 was considerable, for it was surely a strong catalyst for change and Italy's renewal, meaning it gave way to many problematic economical and political aspects, which in turn gave Mussolini the chance to strike at the precise moment in order to have a direct affect on people and ergo win their support. These were aspects such as the damage of the foundations of 'Liberal Italy', which had as a consequence the rise of frustration within nationalists and the decrease in wages and increase in the level of unemployment in the country, all of which were obviously disastrous. Therefore, Italian people started to doubt their government, which seemed weak, and initiated a search for a new, stronger leadership which would bring to cease the social unrest and economic problems; to this, Fascism seemed like the perfect alternative and solution. Nevertheless, the impact of the First World War was just to certain extent the reason for Mussolini's rise to power, for there were many other factors affecting the path of Italy into a Fascist dictatorship. ...read more.

Middle

the possible consequences that his actions could bring, such as provoking the conservatives to make the authorities crush the fascists if their use of violence went too far; this measure of consciousness made him a great politician. Furthermore, in contrast to the slow Liberal reaction, Fascists were fast to accept their role as the alternative to Socialism and dealt with the Social General Strike with great speed; and by putting a stop to the socialist threat they won many votes in the parliament and had an effective result in the support of Italians; on the other hand, the lack of reaction from the Liberals only showed their incompetence to restore law, order and public confidence in their regime; which in turn continued encouraging the urban educated classes to keep thinking that they were in the path towards a civil war, meaning that the sense of crisis in the circumstances had not yet ceased to exist. In addition, Mussolini exploited to the full the situation of the 'General Strike' and thought of it as the opportune moment to oppose the communist threat and hence use the socialist's failure to appeal to the people as a man whose intentions were to save Italy from its inadequate Liberal government and propose a new regime which would be the "salvation of Italy". ...read more.

Conclusion

But as we can see, the March on Rome, instead of leading to a disastrous moment in Mussolini's life as it could have; it was the catalyst to the rise of power of Mussolini, for it provided the exact amount of pressure the King needed to make Mussolini the youngest Prime Minister of Italy. With the above historical debate we can say that the First World War provided the necessary conditions for Mussolini's rise to power, however, these were not sufficient and therefore other affecting factors were eventually needed to complete his successful rise to power, such as the terribly weak Liberal government which enabled the Italian people to look elsewhere for strong leadership and ergo turn to Fascism as an alternative and solution to the Socialist threat, and the brilliant tactics that Mussolini uses as well as his great deal of opportunism which made him capable to turn disastrous situations to his advantage. Such as the Matteoti crisis which forced him to use his ability to speak in front of the masses and convince them of the justification for violence; he also benefited from this crisis by abusing the fact that all other forces in the parliament left hi alone and in control of it. Having said the above, it can be understood that Mussolini's rise to power was, as Richard Parrish describes: "a multi-causal phenomenon". Adriana Zapata ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Why did Mussolini come to Power in 1922? How did Mussolini consolidate his position ...

    4 star(s)

    Luckily for Mussolini the King had always distanced himself from all domestic policy and by the late 1920s it has become apparent the King would not overthrow Mussolini and the Fascists. To secure his position further though, Mussolini limited the King's right to choose Prime Minister from a list compiled by the Fascist Grand Council.

  2. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    Once the Germans had reached economic crisis, Hitler's propositions appeared very appealing, especially to those of lower middle-class who had suffered most from the inflation of the 1920's. Hitler stirred up the German people by reminding them of the humiliating treaty and promised that if he were to be elected

  1. Why was Mussolini appointed Prime Minister in 1922?

    Mussolini was a highly talented and recognisable leader. He was also very talented when it came to altering his policies in order to gain more support form new types of Italians. This is evident in the fact that in 1919 the Fascists primarily appealed to workers, poorer people and socialists

  2. Stalin's Rise To Power

    discounting the ability of the individual to act of their on accord and to be held accountable for their actions. Stalin participated in the mundane tasks of revolutionary activity such as distributing the party literature, organizing the workers and robbing trains to support the cause.

  1. Resentment towards the peace treaties at the end of the first world war made ...

    Middle class voters feeling the pressure economically and disillusioned by the duration and conduct of the war began to affect the behaviour of the Reichstag. This created a crisis of confidence within the German government and widened the gap between the socialists and the more conservative members.

  2. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    as skilful representations of the human body. * She always claimed she approached her work as an artist, not politically. * Riefenstahl's films had great artistic value and the cult of the body was common all over Europe, not just in Nazi Germany.

  1. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    This primarily shows an unwillingness to use this strength, putting them in an inadequate spotlight, not in a potent sense, but in a mental sense, a sense of misjudgement and naivety. Yet, some may argue that the Fascist squads were not necessarily disorderly, and that the government's reluctance to oppose any threat was not problematic.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    This changed under Stalin, when all culture must be linked to the party line. The arts in NEP Russia: Some artists in 1920s Russia accepted the communist message and produced art forms designed to appeal to the masses, but not all did this.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work