• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess Himmler's role and significance in WWII conflict

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Himmler fueled by his extreme racial ideology of the destiny of a Great German Empire and his rooted hatred for Jews was one of the key mechanisms for which established his role and significance within the conflict of WWII as the architect of genocide through the propagandistic manipulation of the SS mentality in calcifying them against the sheer immorality of the elimination of the Jews. His philosophical belief of the war as a struggle of races nevertheless were occasionally compromised by the necessity of military personnel towards the end of the war and economic necessities which the Jewish population had the potential of providing. This leads to his role in directly implementing policies to fund the SS and thus ensure its ongoing influence throughout the war, as well as assisting the war effort through forced labour over building roads and canals. Despite this, Himmler's key contribution to the nature of the war was the elimination of the Jews. Himmler throughout the course of WWII maintained the fundamental and powerful racial ideology of the superiority and inevitable conquest of the Germanic-Nordic. The rooted hatred of Jews was the ultimate racial and ideological foe of Hitler, as he stated himself in a speech in 1943 to the SS "This is a struggle of races." It is through this belief of the war as a means of conquering a racial enemy and through such asserting German power with ...read more.

Middle

This was done with the intent of fulfilling the racial aim of the war and the attainment of Lebensraum for which provided resources for the war effort and a step towards fulfilling Himmler's goal of a powerful German-Nordic Empire. Himmler's ideological standpoint played an important role not only in his implementation repression and murder against Jews but it was also a means of which Himmler hardened the SS psychologically to withstand the atrocities in implementing genocide. He offered the troops a vision of racial conflict throughout history in which the Jews played a critical part. Furthermore, through propagandistic speeches he accentuated the racial hated of the SS and compelled his men to realize the notion of murdering one's own race if they don't efficiently implement his policies of extermination through labour as "because if the anti-tank ditch is not dug, German soldiers will die". Also, in order to ensure the efficiency in the implementation of his polices Himmler addressed commanding officers of the SS divisions where he spoke of the great fortress of Eurpoe of which they were privilege to defend and increase. Therefore, throughout the war Himmler's role, specifically within the holocaust involved psychologically motivating and hardening his subordinates and those implementing the act of genocide through the propagandistic delivery of his own racial and philosophical ideologies, imposing them upon others and calcifying them against the atrocities they would implement. ...read more.

Conclusion

The impact of Himmler's racial policies of genocide affected the nature of the war in that it is one which involved the systematic elimination of a race, as it is not just the outcome of total war, which Himmler claimed it to be in 1944 but also it was inherently a part of a nation's purpose to the war and the means of achieving a philosophical and ideological goal. However, Himmler's role within the war was not limited to the question of race, by 1943 due to the fall of Stalingrad and reverses in Africa, Hitler allowed for the expansion of the Waffen SS. Thus, by 1943, short on German SS personnel Himmler recruited 8 new divisions of men of which none were of German racial origin. For example, Bosnian Moslems were recruited and an entire SS division of anti-Bolshevist Ukrainians were formed. The effectiveness of these SS divisions in serving the needs of the German army varied however overall its inability to alter the direction of the war after Stalingrad and the expansion of Himmler's military ambitions towards the end of the war demonstrate the somewhat limited significance he played to the overall outcome of the war. Furthermore, this can be seen towards the end of the war where Himmler under the pressure of both the advancing Russian army and Hitler's rage drove him into retreat and lose regard for his armies, thus conducting a purge. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent was Hitler solely responsible for the Holocaust

    While each of the individuals involved in the bureaucratic system had their small (yet hugely significant role) in the holocaust, they would not have been able to implement any legislation (such as the hugely significant Nuremburg laws) without the Fuhrer's approval.

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    of his participation in an attempt by the Ba'ath party to assassinate 'Abdul Kareem Kassim in 1961. It is true that the Ba'athists did collaborate with the British agents in the coup d'�tat of t 17th July 1968, but they soon got rid of the British agents in another coup on the 30th of the same month.

  1. American History.

    - In the end, all the tribes were moved, making it clear that even adapting to American ways could not prevent removal. The Cherokees were the best example - they had a constitution and political structure, but the South refused to respect them.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict.

    Instead the USA persuaded the UN Security Council to pass resolution 242, this said for the Israelis to withdraw from newly occupied land provided the Arab States agree on lasting peace which meant to recognise the existence of Israel. However, the Arab countries did not agree to this.

  1. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    of the Armenian enclave of Nagorno Karabagh which was under control of Azerbaijan. The Baltic republics began to claim their independence from the Soviet Union, stating that their annexation in 1939 with the Molotov- Ribbentrop pact was unlawful. Ethnic unrest aslo erupted throughout the Central Asian republics, in Moldavia, and in Georgia.

  2. The German surrender at Stalingrad, February 1943 Sources Question

    lack of consideration or care, but only the loss of hope he now feels. The letter was written in January 1943, for that reason it is primary evidence and it is also coming from a German soldier that was actually there and experiencing all of these emotions and living conditions.

  1. America's involvement in WWII

    "American soldiers were more at home with the horse than with the tank" (Overy 273). The air force was just as bad if not worse. In September 1939 the Air Corps had only 800 combat aircrafts again compared with Germany's 3600 and Russia's 10,000 .

  2. A Summary of WWII.

    At the Munich Conference they agreed to German occupation of the Sudetenland, Hitler's asserted last claim, in the hope of maintaining peace. This hope was short lived, for in March 1939, Hitler took over the rest of Czechoslovakia and seized the former German port of Memel from Lithuania.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work