• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess how far the success of Gladstones first ministry was due to Gladstonian Liberalism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess how far the success of Gladstone's first ministry was due to Gladstonian Liberalism. Gladstone's first ministry is widely proclaimed as his most successful ministry had many popular political titans within it, so this invariably led to success of this ministry but Gladstone was obviously at the heart of this success and arguably without Gladstone many of the successful reforms of the ministry would not have got through and almost certainly not without his unequivocal backing. So he obviously played a large part in the process and therefore his ideologies would have been pushed forward especially by the people, who were wildly supportive of almost any policy he brought out. Therefore Gladstonian Liberalism must have been one of the central factors in the success of Gladstone's first administration. Gladstone was successful in his government because all his reforms were cautious; this meant he did not quickly alienate any one particular group beyond repair, with the possible exception of the Adullamites, with his defeated electoral reform bill. This possibly highlights why the reform bill failed and why Gladstone's first ministry fell down in the end because it wasn't cautious enough in its final reform bill. ...read more.

Middle

This doesn't come through so much in Gladstone's first Liberal government as when he was Chancellor of the Exchequer. This may show that actually Gladstone pushed his form of Liberalism to the back of the agenda and that his ministers may have actually formed most of the policy. He certainly didn't produce the amount of free trade legislation, you would expect from the 'people's William' and the man who helped to reform protectionism and trade laws throughout the early part of his career and literally dominated his early contributions to politics and policy. Gladstonian Liberalism was very much based around the idea of meritocracy, which really shone through in Gladstone's first ministry's reforms. For example, the Liberal government reformed the military promotion system, changing the right and way to get a higher rank from simply having more money, to it being on individual merit, ability and achievement. This kind of reform was central to Gladstone's form of Liberalism and shaped how the people saw him and was one reason why he coined the nickname, the 'people's William'. ...read more.

Conclusion

This furthers this idea of Gladstone being a cautious reformer making sure, he doesn't alienate the people. This characteristic of Gladstonian Liberalism to sit on the fence about some matters meant that Gladstone's first ministry was a success in that it didn't upset any particular groups. A key component of Gladstonian Liberalism was a belief in the establishments and institutions of the nation and although, while Gladstone was in office there was no anti-establishment reforms in Gladstone's first ministry he did nothing to further the establishment's power. This was probably because this pro-establishment feeling was not held by the Whig or Radical components of the Liberal party, so it could be doubted whether the power and influence over policy and ideas in his government was really in Gladstone's hands and whether Gladstonian Liberalism actually exists as it seems that actually in this case it is merely a representation of different components of the party's views. I think the success of Gladstone's first ministry was certainly greatly influenced by so called Gladstonian Liberalism but I think it is too far to say that Gladstonian Liberalism was the main successful component of the government, as so many other big figures were in his cabinet at the time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The student has a good understanding of the different interpretations of the success of Gladstone's ministry, which is good because it shows the examiner that they are thinking widely enough to consider more than one explanation for a single event. ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The student has a good understanding of the different interpretations of the success of Gladstone's ministry, which is good because it shows the examiner that they are thinking widely enough to consider more than one explanation for a single event. The student is good at not straying away from the focus of the question, which is good because it shows they have enough relevant knowledge and understanding to write a full essay.

Level of analysis

The student uses good evidence at most points, such as the section on military promotion, which is good as it shows that the student not only understands the interpretation, but can prove it with evidence. The use of dates is good - this shows the examiner the student can remember not only general information that most candidates will use, but also precise information, and this student takes it a step further by linking it to a wider context - "These rights are the basis on which modern trade union laws have been set out" - which shows they can apply their understanding of historical processes to more than one time period. (The student does this without going too far from the focus of the question.) You always need to be careful that the evidence you are using is definitely factual - this student refers to Gladstone's introduction of a "national health system", which was in fact not started until 1948. This student probably made this mistake by mixing it up with something else - when revising, always re-write the name of the person or institution you are learning at least once so that you are clear about what you know.

The conclusion lets the essay down because it refers to "other big figures in his Cabinet" as a reason for success, but there is no mention of any other member of the Cabinet anywhere in the essay, suggesting the student cannot plan and organise information. A way round this when you get to the conclusion would be to write a quick list of one argument you have made or piece of evidence you have used from each paragraph in the essay, and then try and make you sure you refer to some of the list in the conclusion - this shows the examiner you fully understand your line of argument and can summarise what you have written.

Quality of writing

Apart from occasional apostrophe mistakes, the grammar, spelling and punctuation are good. At some points, the essay uses the first person - "I", "we". This is not a really bad thing but "it could be argued" sounds more impressive than "I would argue" because you are referring more explicitly to the line of argument (showing you are focused) rather than yourself. The essay would also benefit from heavier use of technical terms such as "consequence" and "cause", as these would leave the examiner in no doubt that the student understands how historical events occur and are linked.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by lordharvey 13/04/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How liberal were Gladstone's domestic reforms during his first ministry?

    5 star(s)

    Another of Gladstone's policies involved Army reform. To begin with, the recruits for the army were selected based the same way as those for the civil service. Positions of officers were usually bought rather than earned which resulted in corruption and often and incompetence of the government.

  2. Constitutional Nationalism succeeded in achieving its aims whereas revolutionary nationalism failed and cultural nationalism ...

    Thus it would appear that the Fenians played an important role in Irish society and in Irish nationalism. However, the Fenians also had their fair share of failures such as the hesitation of Stephens in 1865 which aggravated Fenians on both sides of the Atlantic, leading to the removal of

  1. To what extent was the Henrican Reformation imposed from 'above'?

    People after-all do not invest money into a system that has very little future. Shrines were also attracting a considerable amount of attention. In fact, as late as 1538, William Barlow, Bishop of St David's, lamented to Cromwell that a supposedly miraculous candle that burned before Our Lady in Cardingan

  2. How and why did Lord Liverpool survive the Radical Challenges of 1812 ...

    While some threats were very serious, other were not as serious. They could still be classed as serious but the government intervention stopped them getting serious. The Pentrich Revolution, was an attempted revolution stirred up by an agent provocateur especially W.J Richards who informed a group of workers that they

  1. HOW FAR, FROM 1800 TO 1921, DID CONSTITUTIONAL NATIONALISM SUCCEED IN ACHIEVING REFORM WITHIN, ...

    they were insignificant and did nothing to advance O'Connell's desire for the repeal of the Act of Union. Although O'Connell admittedly achieved some success in this early part of the period with the Catholic Association, he saw failure with his National Repeal Association.

  2. How successful was the Reform Act in rectifying defects in the political system?

    Many late nineteenth century historians and early twentieth century historians discussed the Reform Act and debated over the success of it. In my opinion I believe that the Reform Act most definitely made a positive impact on the current system and it also made way for other acts to be passed.

  1. How far were James I's problems inherited, how far of his own making?

    the majority of Elizabeth's policies because of her age and sex and that it therefore expected a much better deal from him4. Right from the beginning Parliament's aims and the kings aims clashed which let to an atmosphere of "distrust and suspicion"5.

  2. How far do you agree with Elton's interpretation of the roles of Somerset and ...

    However, as we have noted, the outcome of religious reform would have been much harder to gauge at the time. While Somerset's religious policy is not the sign of an expert politician, it cannot be used to condemn him to the same extent as his economic record.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work