• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess Lenin's strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Oliver Perretta Assess Lenins strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924? During the period lasting from 1917 to 1924, Vladimir Lenin remained in full power of Russia through the communist Bolshevik party. Throughout, from his rise to power to his death, Lenin made many decisions. The first major events which Led to the Bolsheviks rise to power were the revolutions in February and October, both to which Lenin were absent from. Once the Bolsheviks had gained power, Lenin was determined to ensure that the Bolsheviks ruled to the exclusion of other socialist parties. Throughout their consolidation, Lenin made the decision to abolish the constituent assembly, end the war with Germany, effectively start the civil war, introduce ?War Communism? to control the lives of the Russian people and then changed his tactics by going against his beliefs and introducing the New economic policy as well as using political repression. On top of this, Lenin also had a considerable amount of luck which was evidently shown by his survival after being shot in the neck leading to his decline. In many ways then, Lenin?s decisions could either be described as being reflective of a good leader or a bad leader. ...read more.

Middle

This left the soviets as the only hope of true revolutionaries. Another great decision made by Lenin was that he ordered that the Bolsheviks should seize the moment immediately. Although it may be seen as a weakness that he didn?t listen to anybody, Lenin had his reasons. He was aware of the all-Russian Congress of Soviets and the November election at the constituent assembly, and he knew that these may both limit the Bolsheviks freedom. This then indicates the decision making of a great leader, as Lenin was always looking ahead, one step in front of his opposition. He knew the Bolsheviks had to act to topple over the provisional government; he was determined and ready to push forward any idea to ensure the Bolsheviks seized power. A further strength of Lenin was the amount of effort and hard work he put in to ensure the Bolsheviks won the October revolution. When Kerensky announced that a pre parliament was to be formed, Lenin immediately acted to demolish the plans. He condemned it as a manoeuvre not to broaden the government?s base but to strengthen its grip on power. Following his orders, Bolshevik members of the soviets who could attend the Pre Parliament first derided it then walked out. ...read more.

Conclusion

With this, Lenin made the drastic decision to become allies with Germany, by signing the Brest-Litovsk treaty with Germany which sealed their safety in World War 1 despite losing much land. Russia lost a huge slice of territory, amounting to a third of European Russia stretching from the Baltic to the Black Sea and including Ukraine, Russia?s major grain resource and the land lost contained a population of 45 million people. As well as this Russia had to pay 3 billion roubles in war reparations. However, he made the treaty on a gamble, it was purely ideological. He believed that Germany would lose the war to other western allies and Russia would get its land back. In the end this paid off, However, one may suggest that this risky gamble was not wise and therefore makes Lenin a bad leader. While he sat in his house, with his feet up, he made a huge gamble, yet, the simple fact remains that it did work and in the end Russia could only reap the rewards. To be a successful leader you need to take gambles to make progress, and on this particular occasion, Lenin made a huge gamble which proved to be a successful one. Following the treaty of Brest Litovsk and crushing of the constituent assembly, came the Russian civil war. It is widely suggested that Lenin Truly wanted a destructive civil war ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    The ballots are destroyed. 1934 Dec 1 - Kirov is assassinated by Nikolaev - a party member. His bodyguard was mysteriously absent. Stalin passes a decree giving the NKVD great powers to arrest and detain suspects. Stalin is implicated in the removal of Kirov, a potential rival.

  2. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    Perhaps it was this more extreme approach to ruling Russia which Lenin had feared when he said he did not trust Stalin, and perhaps this is why the ideology of Lenin - Leninism - was still followed many years later whereas Stalin's support was lost.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    This is, admittedly, an extremely hypothetical proposition. but it is not impossible. More concretely, the same sort of rerouting might well have taken place with such more conventional (and far more important) sources of support as individual donations of money and of labour.

  2. Assess the impact of Lenin on Events in Russia between 1917 -1924

    Lenin timed the revolution to when the provisional government was at its weakest and so therefore the Bolsheviks would have significantly more man and firepower so would be able to overthrow with ease. He also timed the revolution to be before the elections, as he knew the people of Russia

  1. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    As a 'Revolutionary Leader or Figure', Lenin is second to none and in this context clearly surpasses Joseph Stalin. It is important to bear in mind that Lenin was Head of State for only six years, compared to Stalin's reign of almost thirty years.

  2. Russia, 1905 - 1917, The Causes of Revolutionary Change. Using your knowledge of the ...

    When Kornilov's army did reach Petrograd, they mutinied and joined the Red Guard. Now the Red Guard had the weapons of Petrograd, and were firmly in control of the situation. This was pure luck by the Bolsheviks, as they did not know if Kornilov was going to revolt in the

  1. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    Rasputin made these predictions before the tzar made his decision to enter the World War, so perhaps if Nicholas II would have listened to Rasputin, and believed in his paranormal skills, Russia would have been spared of the terrors of war.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    time meant a loss in general production which would then lead to famine. Russia also lost 27% of farm land, some of the best in Russia. It also meant a 26% of railways and a 74% of iron ore and coal.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work