• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess Lenin's strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Oliver Perretta Assess Lenins strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924? During the period lasting from 1917 to 1924, Vladimir Lenin remained in full power of Russia through the communist Bolshevik party. Throughout, from his rise to power to his death, Lenin made many decisions. The first major events which Led to the Bolsheviks rise to power were the revolutions in February and October, both to which Lenin were absent from. Once the Bolsheviks had gained power, Lenin was determined to ensure that the Bolsheviks ruled to the exclusion of other socialist parties. Throughout their consolidation, Lenin made the decision to abolish the constituent assembly, end the war with Germany, effectively start the civil war, introduce ?War Communism? to control the lives of the Russian people and then changed his tactics by going against his beliefs and introducing the New economic policy as well as using political repression. On top of this, Lenin also had a considerable amount of luck which was evidently shown by his survival after being shot in the neck leading to his decline. In many ways then, Lenin?s decisions could either be described as being reflective of a good leader or a bad leader. ...read more.

Middle

This left the soviets as the only hope of true revolutionaries. Another great decision made by Lenin was that he ordered that the Bolsheviks should seize the moment immediately. Although it may be seen as a weakness that he didn?t listen to anybody, Lenin had his reasons. He was aware of the all-Russian Congress of Soviets and the November election at the constituent assembly, and he knew that these may both limit the Bolsheviks freedom. This then indicates the decision making of a great leader, as Lenin was always looking ahead, one step in front of his opposition. He knew the Bolsheviks had to act to topple over the provisional government; he was determined and ready to push forward any idea to ensure the Bolsheviks seized power. A further strength of Lenin was the amount of effort and hard work he put in to ensure the Bolsheviks won the October revolution. When Kerensky announced that a pre parliament was to be formed, Lenin immediately acted to demolish the plans. He condemned it as a manoeuvre not to broaden the government?s base but to strengthen its grip on power. Following his orders, Bolshevik members of the soviets who could attend the Pre Parliament first derided it then walked out. ...read more.

Conclusion

With this, Lenin made the drastic decision to become allies with Germany, by signing the Brest-Litovsk treaty with Germany which sealed their safety in World War 1 despite losing much land. Russia lost a huge slice of territory, amounting to a third of European Russia stretching from the Baltic to the Black Sea and including Ukraine, Russia?s major grain resource and the land lost contained a population of 45 million people. As well as this Russia had to pay 3 billion roubles in war reparations. However, he made the treaty on a gamble, it was purely ideological. He believed that Germany would lose the war to other western allies and Russia would get its land back. In the end this paid off, However, one may suggest that this risky gamble was not wise and therefore makes Lenin a bad leader. While he sat in his house, with his feet up, he made a huge gamble, yet, the simple fact remains that it did work and in the end Russia could only reap the rewards. To be a successful leader you need to take gambles to make progress, and on this particular occasion, Lenin made a huge gamble which proved to be a successful one. Following the treaty of Brest Litovsk and crushing of the constituent assembly, came the Russian civil war. It is widely suggested that Lenin Truly wanted a destructive civil war ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    encouraged by Stalin - leading him to be 'worshipped' like a god. This made Lenin a role model for the people of Russia as he was seen as great in influential places such as schools. A religious approach to Lenin is also shown with the fact that there were pilgrimages

  2. Assess the impact of Lenin on Events in Russia between 1917 -1924

    Lenin timed the revolution to when the provisional government was at its weakest and so therefore the Bolsheviks would have significantly more man and firepower so would be able to overthrow with ease. He also timed the revolution to be before the elections, as he knew the people of Russia

  1. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Both Vladimir Lenin and Joseph ...

    Stalin was a very unforgiving and untrusting man. He would trust nobody, not even his own family. He would hold grudges against people whose views opposed his own. As Stalin lived a very tough and unprivileged childhood, he lacked the qualities of humor and pleasantness and was always very serious and unfriendly.

  2. How important was Lenin in the consolidation of Bolshevik rule by 1924?

    The Cheka was set up, in December 1917 by Lenin to arrest and deal with any opposition. They also used force to deal with the civil service strikes and class warfare made it hard for the middle classes and other social groups to criticise the Bolsheviks.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    It could be said therefore that the Provisional Government represented the liberal bourgeoisie and middle classes while the Soviet represented socialist ideas and the proletariat (working classes). It is clear that from the very start, the Provisional Government was not a stable governing force and that it was widely thought

  2. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    that increase was genuine is very difficult to say as many workers gave false production figures to the government to avoid being sent away and being killed. In December 1934 Sergei Kirov, the Communist Party leader in Leningrad, was murdered.

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    Many died from exhaustion. Altogether at least 7,000,000 people disappeared in the Purges, perhaps twice or even three times that number. * Stalin forced some ethnic groups to move from their homelands to Siberia. Whole populations were transported from southern Russia to the east.

  2. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    Rasputin made these predictions before the tzar made his decision to enter the World War, so perhaps if Nicholas II would have listened to Rasputin, and believed in his paranormal skills, Russia would have been spared of the terrors of war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work