• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess Lenin's strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Oliver Perretta Assess Lenins strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924? During the period lasting from 1917 to 1924, Vladimir Lenin remained in full power of Russia through the communist Bolshevik party. Throughout, from his rise to power to his death, Lenin made many decisions. The first major events which Led to the Bolsheviks rise to power were the revolutions in February and October, both to which Lenin were absent from. Once the Bolsheviks had gained power, Lenin was determined to ensure that the Bolsheviks ruled to the exclusion of other socialist parties. Throughout their consolidation, Lenin made the decision to abolish the constituent assembly, end the war with Germany, effectively start the civil war, introduce ?War Communism? to control the lives of the Russian people and then changed his tactics by going against his beliefs and introducing the New economic policy as well as using political repression. On top of this, Lenin also had a considerable amount of luck which was evidently shown by his survival after being shot in the neck leading to his decline. In many ways then, Lenin?s decisions could either be described as being reflective of a good leader or a bad leader. ...read more.

Middle

This left the soviets as the only hope of true revolutionaries. Another great decision made by Lenin was that he ordered that the Bolsheviks should seize the moment immediately. Although it may be seen as a weakness that he didn?t listen to anybody, Lenin had his reasons. He was aware of the all-Russian Congress of Soviets and the November election at the constituent assembly, and he knew that these may both limit the Bolsheviks freedom. This then indicates the decision making of a great leader, as Lenin was always looking ahead, one step in front of his opposition. He knew the Bolsheviks had to act to topple over the provisional government; he was determined and ready to push forward any idea to ensure the Bolsheviks seized power. A further strength of Lenin was the amount of effort and hard work he put in to ensure the Bolsheviks won the October revolution. When Kerensky announced that a pre parliament was to be formed, Lenin immediately acted to demolish the plans. He condemned it as a manoeuvre not to broaden the government?s base but to strengthen its grip on power. Following his orders, Bolshevik members of the soviets who could attend the Pre Parliament first derided it then walked out. ...read more.

Conclusion

With this, Lenin made the drastic decision to become allies with Germany, by signing the Brest-Litovsk treaty with Germany which sealed their safety in World War 1 despite losing much land. Russia lost a huge slice of territory, amounting to a third of European Russia stretching from the Baltic to the Black Sea and including Ukraine, Russia?s major grain resource and the land lost contained a population of 45 million people. As well as this Russia had to pay 3 billion roubles in war reparations. However, he made the treaty on a gamble, it was purely ideological. He believed that Germany would lose the war to other western allies and Russia would get its land back. In the end this paid off, However, one may suggest that this risky gamble was not wise and therefore makes Lenin a bad leader. While he sat in his house, with his feet up, he made a huge gamble, yet, the simple fact remains that it did work and in the end Russia could only reap the rewards. To be a successful leader you need to take gambles to make progress, and on this particular occasion, Lenin made a huge gamble which proved to be a successful one. Following the treaty of Brest Litovsk and crushing of the constituent assembly, came the Russian civil war. It is widely suggested that Lenin Truly wanted a destructive civil war ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Another was to have a women weeping in the next cell mimicking the accused's wife. A Chronology of the main events of the Terror 1930-1938 1930-1 At first the purges concentrated upon technical experts, who Stalin blamed for the failures of the First Five Year Plan.

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    The Provisional Government was not suited to the war situation; their unpopular decision to keep fighting did nothing but breed discontent and drain the country's resources. Another problem that the government had to deal with was that of land. Peasants were demanding land, but the Provisional Government chose to wait until after elections had been held before decisions were made.

  1. Assess the impact of Lenin on Events in Russia between 1917 -1924

    The outcome could of led to the PG becoming stronger and therefore being harder to overthrow but Lenin took the gamble. This shows how much he craved revolution. Another way in which Lenin influenced the revolution was through cunning planning.

  2. How important was Lenin in the consolidation of Bolshevik rule by 1924?

    So even though the peasantry stayed fairly neutral during the Civil War, they would have been slightly more sympathetic towards the Bolsheviks. Although the Bolsheviks' opposition were weak, the Reds wanted to make sure that their power wasn't threatened. They used ruthless methods and terror against the other socialist parties such as the Socialist Revolutionaries.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Thus one finds that fully forty percent of total Bolshevik party membership in August was concentrated in Moscow and Petrograd, where it could be put to practical use in placing the Bolsheviks in power.

  2. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    In a letter to tzar Nicholas II, Rasputin wrote that if he would be killed by the tzar?s will then his entire family would be killed by the rioting public. Also, he predicted that entering the First World War would inevitably bring great grief to Russia.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    6. Considerable population shift. Between 1926-39, urban population increased from 26 to 56 million people (most migrated from countryside to towns for a better standard of living). 7. By 1940, women made up 39% of the workforce, as opposed to 24% in 1928. Between 1928-32, the industrial workforce doubled.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    Th whites aim was to defeat the Bolsheviks. The Whites had the advantage of support from foreign powers suh as Britain, France, Japan and the USA, along with several other countries. Their governments did not want to see Bolshevism spread out in Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work