• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess Lenins strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess Lenin?s strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924. During the period between 1917 and 1924, Lenin was able to consolidate and maintain power for both the Bolshevik party and himself. Lenin?s strengths and weaknesses lie in his ability to use force and compromise, to establish control within Russia and can be assessed through the decisions he made and the implementations of them on Russia. Lenin?s strengths can be seen in his ability to end the war with Germany; defeat opposition both politically and in the Civil War, under the Red Terror; his ruthlessness and determination in being able to force through unpopular decisions and change policy when necessary, as well as the introduction of the NEP following the period of war communism. However, what can be seen as strengths can also be interpreted as weaknesses; Lenin?s unwillingness to compromise with other parties and the dissolution of the Constitute Assembly arguably led to the Civil War; war communism although it perhaps got Russia through the war, resulted in a famine that killed five million people. Lenin had many strengths as leader of Russia between 1917-24, as aforementioned his determination and flexible policies enabled him to establish Bolshevik control over Russia as well as secure Russia economically, however, Lenin?s ruthlessness caused ...read more.

Middle

However, while his willingness to change policy when necessary was a strength, the way that Lenin enforced this change at times displayed a weakness. An example of Lenin?s strength and of his willingness to compromise was the New Economic Policy. This was accepted at the tenth party congress in1921 and it ended the forced grain requisition of War Communism, allowing peasants to sell surplus grain at local markets. It also reintroduced market forces into the Russian economy as private trade was legalised, despite the fact that the Bolsheviks came into power promising to end capitalism in Russia. Lenin now accepted that it was necessary to form an alliance between the workers and the peasants, hence the hammer and sickle on the Soviet flag, and to introduce a new stage into the transition to socialism. Although he was forced into this change, due to the devastating famine in the Volga region and the revolts in Tambov and Kronstadt, NEP was a victory for Lenin?s pragmatism, showing that he knew when to change things. This pragmatism did not replace Lenin?s overall ideological aims though, and he was still determined to build socialism. But he accepted that ?only an agreement with the peasantry can save the Socialist revolution in Russia until the revolution has occurred in other countries.? ...read more.

Conclusion

It also led to a reliance on extreme violence and dictatorial methods, instead of democratic debate, to solve difficult problems; policies which began during the Civil War and which continued to be used afterwards by means of the Cheka. Despite the fact that he sometimes knew when to compromise, Lenin?s heavy-handed, oppressive measures greatly undermined his overall aim; the construction of socialism in Russia. When assessing Lenin?s strength one can take the perspective of the Bolshevik party; whereby Lenin?s ruthlessness and lack of compromise successful strengthened and consolidated their one-party rule over Russia by the end of 1924, or the perspective of Lenin as leader of Russia as a whole; whereby Lenin?s undemocratic ideology denied the country a representative form of government and ultimately cost the lives of millions in the Civil War, Red Terror and widespread famine caused by war communism. To conclude, Lenin?s strengths can ultimately be seen as his weaknesses; his inability to compromise led him to dissolve the constitute assembly, and consequently Lenin secured Bolshevik party but arguably triggered the start of the Civil war and so can be seen as a major weakness. Lenin?s self-confidence meant opposition to the Bolsheviks was destroyed however; it led to a reign of terror and the deaths of millions. His one major strength was his pragmatism, in being willing to forfeit his own ideologies in order to maintain power. Matt Williams ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    In most cases the targets were impossible to achieve. * Such was the response that new improved targets were set in 1929, and these again revised upwards in 1930. It became crucial to meet your planned target. Never mind the quality, meet the target!

  2. How did the Bolsheviks consolidate their power: 1917 - 1924?

    The land decree broke up the large estates belonging to the Crown, Church and Land Owners. This land was then re-distributed to the peasants. This as well as being part of the Bolshevik party line was also an intelligent move by Lenin considering the peasants were the largest group in Russia making up 90% of the population in 1900.

  1. Identified within this study is the argument that whilst many of Lenin's theories and ...

    Another key difference, highlighted and argued by Soviet historians is that whilst Stalin's use of terror was as a result of his personal paranoia and megalomania, Lenin used it solely in 'the name of the interest of the workers'. The official Soviet line of argument on this (as stated in

  2. To what extent was Lenin's leadership the main reason for Bolshevik success in 1917?

    partnered with the Petrograd Soviets, will have been able to win elections and seize control. This is as they've done in the results of the Constituent Assembly election (November 1917)

  1. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    during what became known as the 'Night of the Long Knives', 30 June 1934. Summary * The film presents Germany as an orderly society, with marching, flags and uniforms reinforcing a sense of discipline. * This image reassures European audiences that Germany is no longer threatening the peace.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    the number of local organizations, that membership continued to increase between August and October. Bolshevik representation in the Soviets, soldiers' councils and factory committees also rose, so that by the end of summer the Bolsheviks held a plurality of the seats in soviets located in several key regions of the country.

  1. During his lifetime, Lenin made many important decisions and policies which affected every citizen ...

    everyone because the nobles owned a quarter of the land in Russia. So when Lenin came into power, a decree was passed in November taking all the land away from the Tsar and the old landlords. Land was given to the peasants who would form committees to divide it up fairly.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The failures in the plan were mainly due to the higher priority increasingly given to defence. The Stakhanovite movement: On 30 August 1935, Alexi Stkhanov did a five-hour shift, cutting 102 tonnes of coal with his pick. This was 16 times the average a shift.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work