• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the claim that James and Charles were mainly responsible for religious divisions in the country during the period from 1603-1629

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the claim that James and Charles were mainly responsible for religious divisions in the country during the period from 1603-1629 There were many religious divisions within England before James and Charles even came to power. Mary was a Catholic and hence wanted her country to follow suit, yet when her sister Elizabeth came to power, the church became protestant again, therefore the foundations for religious unsettlement was already there. However, many of the actions James and Charles did whilst in power made this religious gap even larger. James was a protestant and this pleased the mainly protestant England, as many thought he would be Catholic, much like his mother. However, the Catholics felt that as his mother was a Catholic, he would be sympathetic toward their religion and agree to let them have their services, as Elizabeth had denied whilst in power. At first, James was happy to agree to this as he aimed to appease the Catholics yet soon he was losing money from not fining Catholic services and hence re-installed the injunction against Catholic masses and those who were caught were fined. ...read more.

Middle

At first, James had some sympathy towards the Puritans and agreed to hold a conference with Puritan leaders and Bishops on the Church of England to help come to an agreement. However, just before the conference James lost all sympathy for the Puritans as they were making further demands and rallying for petitions. James felt that the Puritans were trying to take away the control of the Church from the ruling classes. Hence, at the conference the Puritans had only a small amount of demands met; their main demands were disregarded fully. This increased the religious gap and also led to Bancroft's canons. Bancroft was the Archbishop of Canterbury and he felt the same about Puritans as James did. After the conference Bancroft introduced a set of rules that all protestant ministers must adhere to, such as ministers must wear robes, a wedding ring must be worn, and ministers must agree to everything in the prayer book. ...read more.

Conclusion

Laud became Archbishop of Canterbury in 1630 and immediately started to make changes within the church. He moved the communion table and turned it into an alter, which only the Catholics used and was very sympathetic toward Catholicism. This made the public believe he was a secret Catholic and as England was mainly protestant, this angered the country. Laud even began to make the Pope believe that the Church of England was turning Catholic. Charles also married a Catholic and this, combined with Laud's sympathy toward the Catholic faith, made the Puritans dislike the Anglicans more. Also, Once Laud came into power he began to make the head decisions within the Church. Once a Bishop died he would instil a Laudian in his place. Laud began to persecute Puritans and even arrested Puritan writers and preachers. Charles did nothing to stop this and hence this caused more disruption within the Protestant church. In conclusion, although there was already a lot of religious differences in England before both James and Charles came into power, a lot of their actions did not help. ?? ?? ?? ?? Leah Waterfield ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    It was traditional for him to believe in the Divine Right and it seemed to him to be the duty of a monarch. Divine Right is the belief that a king is appointed by and only answerable to God. Because of this, Charles felt that Parliament were not only disobeying him, but also disobeying God.

  2. What Is The Truth About The Gunpowder Plot?

    It was highly unlikely that the Catholics were the plotters as the ones who fled were almost completely unarmed. They only had a few weapons on them which is unlikely for people taking out a plot like this as they would be carrying more weapons if they knew that there was quite a high risk of them getting caught.

  1. How well did James and Charles deal with religious affairs in England, relationships with ...

    Although he became more cautious after the Gunpowder plot in 1605, he nevertheless believed that religious harmony could best be achieved without provocation so discreet Catholics could worship undisturbed during his reign and as a community they remained quiescent until his death.

  2. Were the Puritans or Roman Catholics a Greater Threat to James the First between ...

    However, little was done to honor these promises. The only possible achievement of the conference was a decision to commission a new English translation of the bible, which resulted in the publication of the Authorized Version in 1611.

  1. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    Although written during the time of the actual trials, they are not direct dialogue thus contain some bias of the French court recorders who later translated the texts into Latin for the official record. The reliability of the official record is questionable as some documents were added in afterwards to further incriminate Joan.

  2. In 1603, when Elizabeth died, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the church ...

    This was true, but not only could they not be "weaned easily from their reliance on supernatural forces at times of stress", but many villages resorted to "charms, talismans and the magical powers of cunning men and women" to see them through difficult times.

  1. The Portrait of a Lady. Discuss James representations of 'places' for women in this ...

    Estella's economic tragedy illustrates consequences of disposing property onto women who will inevitably marry. She suffers the loss of her property at the hands of an unscrupulous husband who misuses her fortune. The most recent analysis of the chronology of Great Expectations shows that the main action spans between 1812 and 1829 according to Carlisle (1996, P.

  2. How far were the actions and beliefs of Charles responsible for the crisis of ...

    He was different from James in the way he dealt with anyone who disagreed with his views, with malice and retaliation. He was not comfortable with compromise and was always set on getting his own way so it is inevitable that a character such as this would cause much conflict.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work