• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the claim that the House of Lords provided the most serious opposition tothe Liberal party(TM)s policy to create a modern welfare state during the period from 1906 to 1914.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Liberal reforms signaled a huge change in attitudes with the rise of progressive Liberalism and also helped bring about significant change; garnering much support. However the reforms faced much opposition & hindrance from a variety of different groups. Hostility from the House of Lords actively blocked the progress of Lloyd George's 'war budget' (Lloyd George) which aimed to banish poverty from Britain like the 'wolves which once infested its forests', and hence this clash of ideologies brought about a crisis. This was not the only adversary the Liberals had to face, with more radical reform desired by Labour and many workers, anger amongst the Conservatives, and even waning support within the party itself as the reforms alienated more classical Gladstonian Liberals. Although the reforms provided a fundamental shift of policy against poverty, they failed to achieve the resounding support of the poor, workers or Labour party. The reforms were severely limited as they were not preconceived as a welfare programme and failed to eradicate 'poverty, and the wretchedness and human degradation which always follows in its camp' (Lloyd George). ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore the Liberal party's policy to create a welfare state was criticized by many who doubted they would work in practice or thought the burden of cost was too high, 'putting the screw on John Bull'. However despite these negative sentiments in principle, few members of the Liberal party actively opposed the reforms. Furthermore even if the party's core voters were become increasingly dissatisfied by the move towards progressive liberalism, most of its core voters over the period were retained. Thus, it is clear that this movement against reform provided little hindering effect against policy for the creation of a welfare state. The opposition provided by those demanding more reform, and traditional Liberals was almost insignificant when compared to the active resistance posed by the Lords. Confrontation between the Lords had been brewing for some time and reform had been one of Gladstone's demands as far back as 1891. The Lords continually carefully chose Liberal policies and hindered or completely blocked their progress, including the 1906 Education Bill, Land Bills in 1907 and a Licensing Bill in 1908, forcefully obstructing progress. These were not the only clashes the Liberals faced with the House of Lords. ...read more.

Conclusion

This forced Lloyd George to run a minority government depending on support from Labour and Irish nationalists, which in turn distorted policy and further hindered the progress of Liberal reform policy. In conclusion the conflict with the House of Lords without a doubt provided the most serious opposition to the Liberal party's policy to create a modern welfare state. The Lords provided the vast majority of active resistance against the creation of a modern welfare state and were by far the most serious hindrance, compared with other groups which provided little active opposition. However the opposition provided by these other groups was still quite significant in influencing the Party's policy and despite never providing as serious opposition as the Lords, helped to set the foundations for the future demise of the party as a political force. ?? ?? ?? ?? 20/01/2009, JAMES LAWSON HISTORY, LIBERALS & LABOUR MR JEPPESEN Assess the claim that the House of Lords provided the most serious opposition tothe Liberal party's policy to create a modern welfare state during the period from 1906 to 1914. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Liberal Reforms (1906-1914)

    4 star(s)

    After a week of unemployment, the insured worker would receive 7 shillings a week for up to 15 weeks in any one year, as long as they had registered as unemployed at the Labour Exchange, where they would receive the benefit.

  2. Free essay

    Why, between 1903 and 1914, did the women's suffrage movement fail to achieve its ...

    Though not all off the women's groups used violence, Millicent Fawcette wrote in 191 that the NUWSS should" To show the world how gain reforms without, violence, without killing people and blowing up building and

  1. Was the Liberal party dying before WW1?

    Pensions, however, were a simple way of surviving without being humiliated. They were given to those people over 70 and those that earned under �21 a year. There were many calls for this reform to be introduced, so it was well received amongst the majority of the population.

  2. 'The Turn of the Screw'

    Henry James includes two ghosts, to increase suspense and tension, because of their relationship, suggesting that because they were colleagues, they may be plotting to do something sinister together. Also because there are two of them it makes them seem more real and therefore more frightening.

  1. Critically assess the reasons for the liberal adoption of a policy of social reform ...

    This prompted humanitarian concern among the educated and helped to induce the Liberal Social Reform Acts because many of the population's views were changed as regards the poor. Poverty levels were not helped by the great depression which meant that a lot of people living on the 'poverty line' were

  2. To what extent were the welfare reforms of the Liberal governments between 1906 and ...

    For many Liberals who already believed that action needed to be taken, known as ?New Liberals?, the argument of national efficiency simply helped to persuade them they were right, and they often used the argument that Britain would fall behind the rest of the world if nothing was done.

  1. How far did the Liberals create a welfare state?

    The ?empire could not be built on rickety and flat-chested citizens? which proved the sudden urge for the development of the army to improve its strength and progression due to the rejection of 40 percent of the Boer War military being rejected as unfit and to improve the lifestyles of children suffering from the disease, Rickety.

  2. Study all the sources. Using all these sources and your own knowledge, assess the ...

    of power: ?Our hope is that if people find sickness increasing, and insurance premiums going up, they may turn their attention to the prevention of poverty itself?. This also shows a sense of desperation alike Source A, and show the party were in a bad state in 1911 as their votes were still far worse than the Liberals?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work