• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the claim that the House of Lords provided the most serious opposition tothe Liberal party(TM)s policy to create a modern welfare state during the period from 1906 to 1914.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Liberal reforms signaled a huge change in attitudes with the rise of progressive Liberalism and also helped bring about significant change; garnering much support. However the reforms faced much opposition & hindrance from a variety of different groups. Hostility from the House of Lords actively blocked the progress of Lloyd George's 'war budget' (Lloyd George) which aimed to banish poverty from Britain like the 'wolves which once infested its forests', and hence this clash of ideologies brought about a crisis. This was not the only adversary the Liberals had to face, with more radical reform desired by Labour and many workers, anger amongst the Conservatives, and even waning support within the party itself as the reforms alienated more classical Gladstonian Liberals. Although the reforms provided a fundamental shift of policy against poverty, they failed to achieve the resounding support of the poor, workers or Labour party. The reforms were severely limited as they were not preconceived as a welfare programme and failed to eradicate 'poverty, and the wretchedness and human degradation which always follows in its camp' (Lloyd George). ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore the Liberal party's policy to create a welfare state was criticized by many who doubted they would work in practice or thought the burden of cost was too high, 'putting the screw on John Bull'. However despite these negative sentiments in principle, few members of the Liberal party actively opposed the reforms. Furthermore even if the party's core voters were become increasingly dissatisfied by the move towards progressive liberalism, most of its core voters over the period were retained. Thus, it is clear that this movement against reform provided little hindering effect against policy for the creation of a welfare state. The opposition provided by those demanding more reform, and traditional Liberals was almost insignificant when compared to the active resistance posed by the Lords. Confrontation between the Lords had been brewing for some time and reform had been one of Gladstone's demands as far back as 1891. The Lords continually carefully chose Liberal policies and hindered or completely blocked their progress, including the 1906 Education Bill, Land Bills in 1907 and a Licensing Bill in 1908, forcefully obstructing progress. These were not the only clashes the Liberals faced with the House of Lords. ...read more.

Conclusion

This forced Lloyd George to run a minority government depending on support from Labour and Irish nationalists, which in turn distorted policy and further hindered the progress of Liberal reform policy. In conclusion the conflict with the House of Lords without a doubt provided the most serious opposition to the Liberal party's policy to create a modern welfare state. The Lords provided the vast majority of active resistance against the creation of a modern welfare state and were by far the most serious hindrance, compared with other groups which provided little active opposition. However the opposition provided by these other groups was still quite significant in influencing the Party's policy and despite never providing as serious opposition as the Lords, helped to set the foundations for the future demise of the party as a political force. ?? ?? ?? ?? 20/01/2009, JAMES LAWSON HISTORY, LIBERALS & LABOUR MR JEPPESEN Assess the claim that the House of Lords provided the most serious opposition tothe Liberal party's policy to create a modern welfare state during the period from 1906 to 1914. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Liberal Reforms (1906-1914)

    4 star(s)

    Due to the reluctance of the Treasury to pay for the setup and administration of a contributory pension scheme, Asquith decided upon a scheme financed out of taxation. When it was calculated that the cost of state pensions at 65 would be �17 million per annum, the Treasury set an

  2. How did the elderly fare in welfare terms under the English New Poor Law?

    As with the passing of the Poor Law, this was merely a sign of the times: the elderly were presumed to be the responsibility of the family whom they themselves had raised. Little thought was paid to the possibility of the destitution of the familial support structure for Britain's elderly.

  1. Why did the House of Lords reject the 1909 Budget

    The Conservatives seemed very much against any legalisation or new taxation that would take any of the incomes of the wealthy and give it to the poor, who in actual fact were to thank for making Britain rich its middle class wealthy.

  2. Free essay

    Why, between 1903 and 1914, did the women's suffrage movement fail to achieve its ...

    the higher social classes it was likely that people for the same class to follow them, plus nothing could be change with out parliament say so. The support for the public, different social classes and Parliament held different view so support for the movement varied, as many people held tradition

  1. To what extent were the welfare reforms of the Liberal governments between 1906 and ...

    For many Liberals who already believed that action needed to be taken, known as ?New Liberals?, the argument of national efficiency simply helped to persuade them they were right, and they often used the argument that Britain would fall behind the rest of the world if nothing was done.

  2. Explain why the Liberals introduced social reform between 1906 and 1914

    In 1909, the labour exchange act was passed meaning that the unemployed could go to exchange to look for a job. This meant that the levels of unemployment decreased and in turn decreased the levels of poverty. It was a more efficient way of seeking and offering jobs.

  1. Study all the sources. Using all these sources and your own knowledge, assess the ...

    The date of the source is May 1911, which was after the 2 General Elections in 1910 whereby the Liberals ?

  2. How far did the Liberals create a welfare state?

    Liberalism was always been about freedom and Liberals were frequently changing their minds about the type of freedom they wanted. T.H Green, an active member of the Liberal Party developed his idea about ?positive freedom?. New Liberalism thinking was extremely relevant to the Liberals around 1900 as they become more

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work