• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the contribution of Cavour, Garibaldi andNapoleon III to the unification of Italy

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the contribution of Cavour, Garibaldi and Napoleon III to the unification of Italy The "Risorgimento" or "Resurrection" culminated in the declaration of the Kingdom of Italy and was finalized and put beyond all doubt when Rome, capital of the Papal States, was conquered in 1870. There were three key members of this gradual process who made the unification of Italy possible. Cavour, born into a noble Piedmontese family, started his career in the military but, due to his liberal views he was forced to leave and he resigned in 1831. After Pope Pius IX's election in 1846, Cavour felt that the chance for him to advocate reform had come. ...read more.

Middle

Cavour immediately set to provoking Austria into war, and in April 1859 Austria attacked the small Italian state. However, after ferocious victories, Napoleon decided to withdraw his troops. A compromise was formed and it allowed the Austrians to keep Venetia and transferred the territories conquered by the Sardinians to their former rulers. Sardinia received only Lombardy. Although Cavour was furious at Napoleon, the situation soon reversed itself when the citizens of Tuscany, Modena, Parma and Bologna voted to become part of Sardinia anyway. Garibaldi's influence, it seems to me, was small in the big scheme of things and although he was influenced by Mazzini, who has been left out in the title but played a great role in organising and initiating the ...read more.

Conclusion

It is to this able man that the honour of the unification of Italy most fully belongs, and it is unfortunate that he did not live to see it. He sent a Sardinian army to the assistance of France and England in the Crimea in 1855, and by this act gave his state a standing among the powers of Europe. He secured liberty of the press. He rebelled against the dominion of the papacy, and devoted his abilities to the liberation and unity of Italy. The war of 1859 was his work, and he had the satisfaction of seeing Sardinia increased by the addition of Lombardy, Tuscany, Parma and Modena. A great step had been taken in the work to which he had devoted his life. ?? ?? ?? ?? James Crosbie E ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contrast The Contribution Made By Mazzini, Cavour and Garibaldi to Italian Unification

    4 star(s)

    The revolutions organised by him in towns like Bologna (1843) or Milan (1853) all ended in a failure, which was caused by the fact that Mazzini was an ideological leader, not a military one. In politisc, however, he had some acheivements, for during his exiles (1837-1840 and 1850)

  2. How successful was Napoleon III?

    However although he did all of this he also actively courted support by increasing the pay of prefects and army officers, distributing government contracts and promising to support the Catholic Church. Thus within a few months the 'authoritarian Empire' had been established and had a large amount of support.

  1. Compare & Contrast Cavour & Garibaldi's Contributions to the Unification.

    It is certainly true that the cause was there for both, but the ways they approached it and the way it came about was fall less well planned than the 'beautiful legend'. Garibaldi's devotion to Victor Emmanuel and his recognition of the king as the sole ruler of the new

  2. Compare and contrast Cavour and Garibaldi's contributions to Unification.

    Essentially, Cavour was a conservative and an opponent of Mazzinian views. He was also a liberal in many respects and a socialist opposer.

  1. Who was more responsible for the success of Italian Unification up to 1861? Cavour, ...

    When the Crimean war broke out in 1853 a perfect opportunity was granted. Victor Emmanuel offered the British, French and Turkish alliance a force of 18,000 men to assist the cause, this was accepted and in return Piedmont was given a seat at the negotiating table (The treaty of Paris).

  2. To what extent was Napoleon nothing more than a dictator?

    The policy which ensured secondary education was theoretically available for everyone was that he was a liberator through his support of meritocracy (advancement based on skill, rather than social standing or financial origin). * Religious toleration, Declaration of Rights: The developed on the values of the Declaration of Rights, in

  1. How far do you agree that Cavour made the most significant contribution to Italian ...

    Whilst Cavour was the politician/diplomat, Garibaldi was the military leader. A prominent member of Italian secret societies, he organized 1,150 Red Shirts into what was called "Garibaldi's Thousand." He invaded the Two Sicilies, and the government there collapsed around itself as thousands of citizens rallied behind Garibaldi.

  2. Was Napoleon a dictator?

    Napoleon had the power to appoint people. This is very dictator like as he has prevented any check on power and centralised the power around himself yet tried to disguise it with fake public votes and limited selective lists of appointment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work