• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the contribution of Cavour, Garibaldi andNapoleon III to the unification of Italy

Extracts from this document...


Assess the contribution of Cavour, Garibaldi and Napoleon III to the unification of Italy The "Risorgimento" or "Resurrection" culminated in the declaration of the Kingdom of Italy and was finalized and put beyond all doubt when Rome, capital of the Papal States, was conquered in 1870. There were three key members of this gradual process who made the unification of Italy possible. Cavour, born into a noble Piedmontese family, started his career in the military but, due to his liberal views he was forced to leave and he resigned in 1831. After Pope Pius IX's election in 1846, Cavour felt that the chance for him to advocate reform had come. ...read more.


Cavour immediately set to provoking Austria into war, and in April 1859 Austria attacked the small Italian state. However, after ferocious victories, Napoleon decided to withdraw his troops. A compromise was formed and it allowed the Austrians to keep Venetia and transferred the territories conquered by the Sardinians to their former rulers. Sardinia received only Lombardy. Although Cavour was furious at Napoleon, the situation soon reversed itself when the citizens of Tuscany, Modena, Parma and Bologna voted to become part of Sardinia anyway. Garibaldi's influence, it seems to me, was small in the big scheme of things and although he was influenced by Mazzini, who has been left out in the title but played a great role in organising and initiating the ...read more.


It is to this able man that the honour of the unification of Italy most fully belongs, and it is unfortunate that he did not live to see it. He sent a Sardinian army to the assistance of France and England in the Crimea in 1855, and by this act gave his state a standing among the powers of Europe. He secured liberty of the press. He rebelled against the dominion of the papacy, and devoted his abilities to the liberation and unity of Italy. The war of 1859 was his work, and he had the satisfaction of seeing Sardinia increased by the addition of Lombardy, Tuscany, Parma and Modena. A great step had been taken in the work to which he had devoted his life. ?? ?? ?? ?? James Crosbie E ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contrast The Contribution Made By Mazzini, Cavour and Garibaldi to Italian Unification

    4 star(s)

    The revolutions organised by him in towns like Bologna (1843) or Milan (1853) all ended in a failure, which was caused by the fact that Mazzini was an ideological leader, not a military one. In politisc, however, he had some acheivements, for during his exiles (1837-1840 and 1850)

  2. Who was more responsible for the success of Italian Unification up to 1861? Cavour, ...

    "(Andrina Stiles in The Unification of Italy 1815-70) on why Victor Emmanuel II was given such a large place in the history books. Victor Emmanuel was therefore limited in his role in the unification however without him there would not have been a figurehead to which the people could look

  1. Compare & Contrast Cavour & Garibaldi's Contributions to the Unification.

    It is certainly true that the cause was there for both, but the ways they approached it and the way it came about was fall less well planned than the 'beautiful legend'. Garibaldi's devotion to Victor Emmanuel and his recognition of the king as the sole ruler of the new

  2. How successful was Napoleon III?

    In 1851 Napoleon III had started setting up a new constitution which came into effect in January 1852; it consisted of two chambers, the Corps Legislatif and the senate but both had little power as they were only consultative and they were full of government placemen (who were people who had been given jobs in return for their support).

  1. Compare and contrast Cavour and Garibaldi's contributions to Unification.

    Essentially, Cavour was a conservative and an opponent of Mazzinian views. He was also a liberal in many respects and a socialist opposer.

  2. "Cavour put himself first while Garibaldi put Italy first" - Discuss.

    By this Central Duchies were united, but Nice and Savoy were given to France. This damaged the territorial integrity of Italy. If he did not asked for France help and fought by themselves, they might have unified nice and Savoy also.

  1. How far do you agree that Cavour made the most significant contribution to Italian ...

    Whilst Cavour was the politician/diplomat, Garibaldi was the military leader. A prominent member of Italian secret societies, he organized 1,150 Red Shirts into what was called "Garibaldi's Thousand." He invaded the Two Sicilies, and the government there collapsed around itself as thousands of citizens rallied behind Garibaldi.

  2. Was Napoleon a dictator?

    Propaganda and Censorship: Another of Napoleons policies that was used in order to secure power was propaganda and censorship. Propaganda was used a great deal during Napoleon?s rise to power to cultivate a desired image for himself. He achieved this by displaying his numerous military victories all over France and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work