• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the effectiveness of Napoleon III's foreign policy. How did his foreign policy affect the political development of France up to 1871?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the effectiveness of Napoleon III's foreign policy. How did his foreign policy affect the political development of France up to 1871? In general terms, Napoleon's foreign policy was much less successful than his domestic policy was. Generally speaking, the aims of his foreign policy were to present France as the champion of oppressed people throughout Europe, to create new countries, which would be grateful to France, to maintain good relation with Britain and to maintain a balance of power between Austria and Prussia. Napoleon's foreign policy was shown effective in the Crimean War 1854-56. His aims were to increase French prestige, to isolate Austria, to diminish Russian influence and to maintain good relation with Britain. In the Crimean War, France was successful in achieving these aims. According to Norman Rich, " France was the state that seemed to have gained most from the war." This quotation shows us that his foreign policy was able to achieve his aims. French armies had won the most impressive victories in the Final attacks on Sevastopol and France had supplanted Russia as the dominant power in Europe, which helped France to increase her prestige. Besides, he was succeeded in isolating Austria in the war. ...read more.

Middle

He still wanted to increase French prestige, however, he was failed. His encouragement of the Polish rebellion again Russia in 1863 gave rise to cruelly false hopes among Polish patriots, to whom he was unable to give effective aid according to Norman Rich. Such kind of action was failed to increase French prestige and led to further increasing hostile between France and Russia. From the above we can be seen, his foreign policy was proved ineffective again in the Polish Revolt. His foreign policy in the Mexican Campaign was also proved ineffective. His aims were to gain prestige of France and to create new countries, which would be grateful to France. Napoleon wanted to gain prestige by having greater influence in Mexico. Taking advantage of the fact the Civil War left the United States unable to interfere in Mexico, he sent an army to establish a king there. However, he had failed. He lost the friendship of USA at the same time since he violated the Monore Dotrine to interfere in Mexico. He also lost the influence in Mexico as he was worried about the increasing power of Prussia on his eastern border and therefore agreed to withdraw his troops from Mexico. ...read more.

Conclusion

Firstly, his foreign policy led to the zenith of Napoleon. His achievement in foreign policy was all successful and great up to 1860. This year, 1860, was proved the highest point of his attainment in foreign policy and led to the zenith of Napoleon. Secondly, his foreign policy also led to the decline of the Second Empire. His repeated failure in the foreign policies made France became weak and faced the financial difficulties. Besides, he was no longer supreme due to his repeated failure in his foreign policy. As a result, the Second Empire became decline. Besides, his foreign policy led to the establishment of Liberal Empire. Many problems were created as a result o the government's isolation from the country and its weakness. There was increasing critism of the Second Empire such as conflicts between a policy of support for liberal cause abroad and dictatorship at home, failures in foreign policies and free trade with Britain. Opposition thus created. In order to minimize opposition and to get the support of liberals, a compromise was reached. In January 1870, the Liberal Empire was established. From the above we can be seen, Napoleon III's foreign policy was quite effective in the period of Crimean War. However, his foreign was became failure after the year 1860. It was not only affected the political development of France up to 1871, but also affected the development in the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Mussolini's foreign policy.

    3 star(s)

    The Greeks appealed to the League who with the help of the Council of Ambassadors succeeded in finding a solution. Italy received an apology and the 50 million lire in compensation. The Corfu incident appeared to suggest that aggression did pay and was seen as a triumph by Italian nationalists.

  2. How successful was Napoleon III?

    Then in December 1851 he launched his coup where potential opponents were arrested, key buildings were occupied and the army was brought in as a precaution, Louis Napoleon then declared himself President for 10 more years which was then approved by a 90% vote in the subsequent plebiscite.

  1. Assess the success of Bismarck's foreign policy with reference to: a) Keeping France isolated ...

    After the failure of this scheme to isolate France he now had to come up with another. In 1875 Bismarck became alarmed at the rapid revitalization of the French army, which resulted in an increase in its strength. Bismarck saw his opportunity to isolate the French further when they ordered several horses to be exported from Berlin.

  2. To what extent was Bismarck in control of the direction Germany's Foreign Policy took ...

    According to Langer, "No other statesman of standing had ever before shown the same great moderation and sound political sense of the possible and the desirable", this can clearly be justified. There were five main understandings and alliances, which were established during the two decades, following the Unification of Germany,

  1. To what extent was Bismarcks main foreign policy aim the isolation of France?

    Bismarck was aware that if France gained allies that Germany would loose power as it would be encircled. The power that Bismarck had gained from France's defeat was enough to defeat France on its own again, however if Bismarck used this power unwisely it could inspire fear causing allies to join France.

  2. Analyse the Aims successes and failures of Bismarck's Foreign policy between the years 1871 ...

    However German historians say that he was creating a bloc across middle Europe maintaining the balance between Britain in the west and Russia in the East. The alliance would also of done Bismarck some favours at home because it would please Catholics, national liberals, conservatives and the army during a time when there was intense political division over tariffs.

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    The question that the league had to take was what to do with Italy if they took this action. The problem that the league had was that the action they took depended on the actions of the French and the British who were the two great powers in the league

  2. How significant was foreign influence in shaping Italian political and social development in the ...

    This illustrates Austrian dominance over political protest and the reactionary force that Metternich was prepared to use against Italy. The ruthless reaction from Austria aided in creating unification between fellow revolutionaries. Alan Farmer states that "the only thing [secret societies] had in common was a desire to kick out the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work