• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the effectiveness of Napoleon III's foreign policy. How did his foreign policy affect the political development of France up to 1871?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the effectiveness of Napoleon III's foreign policy. How did his foreign policy affect the political development of France up to 1871? In general terms, Napoleon's foreign policy was much less successful than his domestic policy was. Generally speaking, the aims of his foreign policy were to present France as the champion of oppressed people throughout Europe, to create new countries, which would be grateful to France, to maintain good relation with Britain and to maintain a balance of power between Austria and Prussia. Napoleon's foreign policy was shown effective in the Crimean War 1854-56. His aims were to increase French prestige, to isolate Austria, to diminish Russian influence and to maintain good relation with Britain. In the Crimean War, France was successful in achieving these aims. According to Norman Rich, " France was the state that seemed to have gained most from the war." This quotation shows us that his foreign policy was able to achieve his aims. French armies had won the most impressive victories in the Final attacks on Sevastopol and France had supplanted Russia as the dominant power in Europe, which helped France to increase her prestige. Besides, he was succeeded in isolating Austria in the war. ...read more.

Middle

He still wanted to increase French prestige, however, he was failed. His encouragement of the Polish rebellion again Russia in 1863 gave rise to cruelly false hopes among Polish patriots, to whom he was unable to give effective aid according to Norman Rich. Such kind of action was failed to increase French prestige and led to further increasing hostile between France and Russia. From the above we can be seen, his foreign policy was proved ineffective again in the Polish Revolt. His foreign policy in the Mexican Campaign was also proved ineffective. His aims were to gain prestige of France and to create new countries, which would be grateful to France. Napoleon wanted to gain prestige by having greater influence in Mexico. Taking advantage of the fact the Civil War left the United States unable to interfere in Mexico, he sent an army to establish a king there. However, he had failed. He lost the friendship of USA at the same time since he violated the Monore Dotrine to interfere in Mexico. He also lost the influence in Mexico as he was worried about the increasing power of Prussia on his eastern border and therefore agreed to withdraw his troops from Mexico. ...read more.

Conclusion

Firstly, his foreign policy led to the zenith of Napoleon. His achievement in foreign policy was all successful and great up to 1860. This year, 1860, was proved the highest point of his attainment in foreign policy and led to the zenith of Napoleon. Secondly, his foreign policy also led to the decline of the Second Empire. His repeated failure in the foreign policies made France became weak and faced the financial difficulties. Besides, he was no longer supreme due to his repeated failure in his foreign policy. As a result, the Second Empire became decline. Besides, his foreign policy led to the establishment of Liberal Empire. Many problems were created as a result o the government's isolation from the country and its weakness. There was increasing critism of the Second Empire such as conflicts between a policy of support for liberal cause abroad and dictatorship at home, failures in foreign policies and free trade with Britain. Opposition thus created. In order to minimize opposition and to get the support of liberals, a compromise was reached. In January 1870, the Liberal Empire was established. From the above we can be seen, Napoleon III's foreign policy was quite effective in the period of Crimean War. However, his foreign was became failure after the year 1860. It was not only affected the political development of France up to 1871, but also affected the development in the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Mussolini's foreign policy.

    3 star(s)

    The Greeks appealed to the League who with the help of the Council of Ambassadors succeeded in finding a solution. Italy received an apology and the 50 million lire in compensation. The Corfu incident appeared to suggest that aggression did pay and was seen as a triumph by Italian nationalists.

  2. How successful was Napoleon III?

    Then in December 1851 he launched his coup where potential opponents were arrested, key buildings were occupied and the army was brought in as a precaution, Louis Napoleon then declared himself President for 10 more years which was then approved by a 90% vote in the subsequent plebiscite.

  1. To what extent was Bismarck in control of the direction Germany's Foreign Policy took ...

    The decision of the powers was that the eastern question was to be decided at a 'Congress of Berlin', with the German chancellor acting as "honest broker". Under the Congress, and Bismarck's advising the newly created Bulgaria was split into three parts: Bulgaria, Rumelia and Macedonia.

  2. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    In these secret meetings they made some secret agreement some of these involved Abyssinia and yet Abyssinia wasn't even there so one of the major powers was making secret agreements with the country that is almost certainly ready to go to war.

  1. "How far do the sources suggest consistent aims in Mussolini's foreign policy 1922-1939?"

    Fascism, an increase in international prestige for the regime and Italy, and increased domestic support for the government. Part B; What impact did the pursuit of an aggressive foreign policy have upon the Italian people? "I want to make Italy great, respected and feared..."

  2. Mussolinis’s Foreign Policy

    He was mistrusted by both, London and Paris and was set aside from the European stage. The incident in Corfu, in 1923 gave Mussolini the reputation of being a dangerous firebrand. In 1923 Mussolini seized the chance to occupy Corfu, a strategically important island guarding the Southern entrance into the

  1. To what extent was Bismarcks main foreign policy aim the isolation of France?

    Bismarck was aware that if France gained allies that Germany would loose power as it would be encircled. The power that Bismarck had gained from France's defeat was enough to defeat France on its own again, however if Bismarck used this power unwisely it could inspire fear causing allies to join France.

  2. How significant was foreign influence in shaping Italian political and social development in the ...

    This illustrates Austrian dominance over political protest and the reactionary force that Metternich was prepared to use against Italy. The ruthless reaction from Austria aided in creating unification between fellow revolutionaries. Alan Farmer states that "the only thing [secret societies] had in common was a desire to kick out the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work