Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the impact that Stalin had on Russia and the Russian people

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the impact that Stalin had on Russia and the Russian people Stalin came to power in 1928 after cleverly outsmarting his political opponents by playing them off against each other, while he remained an unlikely source of leader until only he remained. Stalin changed the economic footing of Russia enormously. Industrialization, the development of industry was massive. After 13 years, production figures for almost all products flourished to a huge extent. Most increased by at least 1000%. However this cannot disguise the fact that people claimed that they had achieved quotas to avoid getting punished. They were also the figures published by Stalin and the USSR, and for this reason would have been doctored. When industrializing a country it begins slowly and the 'take-off' point is achieved where a quantum leap is activated. This would explain the astounding rise of the economy. There is no way that life in Russia was better than that in the advanced countries. ...read more.

Middle

succeeded in that it restored the pre-Communism agricultural production levels. However took almost 30 years and was achieved at a huge cost, mainly to human life. Its main aims - cheap food produced by the peasants were achieved and so it cannot be called unsuccessful in this way. . Russia was still not as efficient at farming as GB, US and Germany though. Conversely, for the great majority of the Russian population life did not improve. Stalin could have industrialized as successfully, perhaps even more successfully with being so brutal and losing so many innocent lives. Collectivisation was a great communist ideal- the sharing of land equipment and wealth. This was a true Communist left-wing belief. It was partly motivated by the ideology that sharing was right. The NEP also motivated it. Land owning peasants - kulaks - had made a fortune during the 1st four-year plan. This created lack of uniformity in wealth, and also made the kulaks, for whom capitalism was their life, the natural enemy of Communism. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin succeeded by means of terror in making the Russians believe that what he was doing was right. He also made them believe that the terrorization of his totalitarian rule was the only method that could help Russia. He controlled their ideas through censorship and they died for him, believing they had helped to build a better future for Russia. Stalin did everything 'in the interests of the Party.' He was only killing many people in the Purges because they were working against him, Stalin, the one man who could turn Russia into a modern industrialized country. Therefore if they were working against him then they were betraying the Communist regime and Russia, and deserved to be shot. Had Russia lost to the Germans, it is very feasible that the Germans would have kept hold of Russia and could still be ruling it now. Obviously this would be a huge change for Russia and its population. Even many years after Stalin's death people still idolized him. He had transformed the country, but they couldn't see how much life was wasted to achieve it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    The Bolsheviks had never been fond of the peasants;24 they had conservative tendencies and petty-bourgeois attitudes. However, they would create the profit so desperately needed for industrialisation; without it there would be no socialism. Industrialisation and the Equality of the Proletariat It is crucial to note that Stalin was not the initiator of suppressing the rights of the proletariat.

  2. Alexander II did little to really improve the lives of the Russian people

    views - however, just as with the Emancipation of the Serfs, this is merely a thin glass window of illusions; easily shattered by the hammer of facts. The zemstvo and the duma alike had no control over the police. Due to the fact that the police are the eyes, ears

  1. Assess the Impact Lenin Had On Russia and Its People Lenin was a great ...

    Kerensky gave rifles to the Red Guard and soon they were on the street prepared to defend Petrograd from Kornilov. Though, Kornilov's troops had never arrived because the trains they were on were stopped by the railway workers. Kornilov's troops were then persuaded by fellow workers and soldiers not to fight with their fellow Russians.

  2. The Rise of Communism In Russia

    When the troops were called in to disperse the crowds, they refused to fire their weapons and joined in the rioting. The army generals reported that it would be pointless to send in any more troops, because they would only join in with the other rioters.

  1. Lenin and his life

    Before long, and coupled with bad winters, a food shortage developed in Russia that was only exacerbated by many peasant uprisings, such as the Tambov Rebellion of 1919-1921(Wikipedia - War Communism[www]). Before long, there was famine throughout all of Russia, and millions died.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    There were great achievements. * But there was also muddle, confusion and waste. It is sometimes hard to separate the rhetoric from the reality when we consider the issue. How were these aims achieved? * Forced labour from the Gulags played a large part in many projects.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    2. Once peasants had been organised into state farms, it was easier to bombard them with propaganda. 3. Peasants more likely to be literate. 4. Party likely to have had more success in influencing those in towns and cities, where an increasing number of party members were trained as organisers of meetings in factories.

  2. To What Extent Did Stalin Successfully Socialise Russian Society?

    Stalin also hoped to promote his ideal of ?Homo Sovieticus? or the ?Soviet Man?. Furthermore art was used by the state for propaganda to highlight the glorious achievements of the USSR. However whilst these images of prosperity and the successes of socialism were being portrayed in art they did not

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work