• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the importance of the Soviets to the Bolshevik seizure of power in 1917.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the importance of the Soviets to the Bolshevik seizure of power in 1917. Historians have widely debated the importance of the Soviets to the Bolsheviks seizure of power. Where the more liberal, western historians under emphasise the role of the Soviets and giving the Bolsheviks no popular the mandate, Soviet historians over emphasise their role. Soviet historians give too much credibility to the Bolsheviks support from the Soviets. In fact although the Soviets did give some popular support to the Bolsheviks their importance lies, in their own radical nature and desire for change, which allowed Lenin and the Bolsheviks to use them and turn it into the 'October revolution' as we know it today. The Soviets were important in allowing the Bolshevik takeover due to their own radical nature. Throughout September and October the soviets became a lot more politicised and radicalised. Through their want for change, they actively went against the capitalist rule. By October bread rations were half of what they had been in February and this resulted in many strikes. Within the workforce there was widespread popular movement for an eight hour day, wage increases and workers being allowed to run their own factory. ...read more.

Middle

There is no doubt that there was a popular want for change however we must question whether it was economic motivation or political motivation. There were many unorganised groups whom formed their own organization and were of the most radical groups but had a low level of political consciousness. This is evidence for the Liberal interpretation that there was no popular mandate for the Bolsheviks but a more general movement. However in saying this, it must be taken into account when using evidence from liberal western historians the tensions during the cold war. The tensions between communist Russia and the Capitalist west causes the Liberal historians to stress the limitations of the Bolsheviks in gaining mass popular support. Moreover, we must acknowledge that many of the workers, identified with Bolshevik party line. They agreed with the hatred of the war, bitterness to the Bourgeoisie and moreover, had a drive for local level democracy through the local soviets and factory committees. This shows a commitment to socialism and not just change. We see this commitment and popular support of the Bolsheviks from the Soviets in the November election within the urban working class where they won 70% of the vote. ...read more.

Conclusion

This shows Lenin's popular mandate was almost completely distributed in Petrograd. Lenin used slogans such as 'all power to the Soviets' to try and mask the takeover as popular and the Bolsheviks having a majority when at no point was this the case. However the role of the Soviets can not be ignored, although the Bolsheviks had no popular mandate outside of Petrograd they still managed to takeover which shows further importance of the Soviets. The Bolsheviks managed to takeover through the Soviets giving them Petrograd and paving the way for them while having no popular mandate in the rest of Russia. To conclude, debate whether the Soviets were important is often overestimated giving full credit to Lenin and the Bolsheviks and their popular support and often underestimated giving the Bolsheviks no popular mandate. The Bolsheviks did have some popular mandate but the Soviets radicalism was the main factor, which allowed the Bolsheviks to takeover. Without their radicalism and want for change and Bolsheviks wouldn't have been able to gain support and unite their antagonisms. Therefore the Soviets were a necessary factor and of great importance in the October revolution. Maya Wegrzyn 13BLK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Russia, 1905 - 1917, The Causes of Revolutionary Change. Using your knowledge of the ...

    would protect Petrograd from the oncoming army. The Provisional Government said that they would give all the weapons of Petrograd to the Red Guard if they would protect the capital. Lenin jumped at this opportunity when it arose, as he knew that the Provisional Government were making a huge mistake.

  2. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    A foremost failure of Kerensky was a decision he took when he was Minister of War. Kerensky attempted radical reforms in the military by getting revolutionary obedience. On the contrary, Bolshevik propaganda and Order Number One turned the military against the Provisional Government.

  1. The Bolshevik Consolidation of power 1917-21.

    communist cause and they boosted morale and gave the Reds a sense of purpose that their opponents lacked. * Both sides were guilty of committing atrocities in the areas they controlled and the Reds gained recruits by offering defeated troops and uncommitted civilian enlistment or execution.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    In the economic disorder of revolutionary Russia, this meant fighting perpetually with the Provisional Government over pay, but also demanding (and winning) the right for Vikzhel members to have the "first claim" to food supplies, once military needs had been covered.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    This proved crucial during the reactionary Kornilov revolt when Kerensky who could not rely on the loyalty of the Petrograd Garrison in face of an army putsch had no alternative but to call upon the support of Lenin and his Red Guards.

  2. The Bolshevik Consolidation of Power 1918-21.

    in convincing his colleagues, and gained his way only by threatening to resign. Lenin and Trotsky were primarily internal revolutionaries, and for them Russia was a means to an end - world-wide proletarian revolution. Not all Bolsheviks shared this vision.

  1. How important was Lenin in bringing about the Bolshevik revolution of November 1917?

    - and from stray bullets. The main fictional source of propaganda; the film 'October', can not be used as evidence because it was filmed in 1927, and in 1917 cameras where not yet sophisticated enough to film in the dark, so its night scenes of the revolution couldn't have been filmed.

  2. Assess the view that the Bolshevik rule from 1917 to 1924 was shaped more ...

    Lenin had failed to interpret one very important piece of any society. There will always be greed and a lust for power for those that don?t have it. John Laver book, ?Lenin? which was published in 1994 addresses Lenin?s view towards the different Nationalities of the Russian Empire, now by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work