• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the importance of the Soviets to the Bolshevik seizure of power in 1917.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the importance of the Soviets to the Bolshevik seizure of power in 1917. Historians have widely debated the importance of the Soviets to the Bolsheviks seizure of power. Where the more liberal, western historians under emphasise the role of the Soviets and giving the Bolsheviks no popular the mandate, Soviet historians over emphasise their role. Soviet historians give too much credibility to the Bolsheviks support from the Soviets. In fact although the Soviets did give some popular support to the Bolsheviks their importance lies, in their own radical nature and desire for change, which allowed Lenin and the Bolsheviks to use them and turn it into the 'October revolution' as we know it today. The Soviets were important in allowing the Bolshevik takeover due to their own radical nature. Throughout September and October the soviets became a lot more politicised and radicalised. Through their want for change, they actively went against the capitalist rule. By October bread rations were half of what they had been in February and this resulted in many strikes. Within the workforce there was widespread popular movement for an eight hour day, wage increases and workers being allowed to run their own factory. ...read more.

Middle

There is no doubt that there was a popular want for change however we must question whether it was economic motivation or political motivation. There were many unorganised groups whom formed their own organization and were of the most radical groups but had a low level of political consciousness. This is evidence for the Liberal interpretation that there was no popular mandate for the Bolsheviks but a more general movement. However in saying this, it must be taken into account when using evidence from liberal western historians the tensions during the cold war. The tensions between communist Russia and the Capitalist west causes the Liberal historians to stress the limitations of the Bolsheviks in gaining mass popular support. Moreover, we must acknowledge that many of the workers, identified with Bolshevik party line. They agreed with the hatred of the war, bitterness to the Bourgeoisie and moreover, had a drive for local level democracy through the local soviets and factory committees. This shows a commitment to socialism and not just change. We see this commitment and popular support of the Bolsheviks from the Soviets in the November election within the urban working class where they won 70% of the vote. ...read more.

Conclusion

This shows Lenin's popular mandate was almost completely distributed in Petrograd. Lenin used slogans such as 'all power to the Soviets' to try and mask the takeover as popular and the Bolsheviks having a majority when at no point was this the case. However the role of the Soviets can not be ignored, although the Bolsheviks had no popular mandate outside of Petrograd they still managed to takeover which shows further importance of the Soviets. The Bolsheviks managed to takeover through the Soviets giving them Petrograd and paving the way for them while having no popular mandate in the rest of Russia. To conclude, debate whether the Soviets were important is often overestimated giving full credit to Lenin and the Bolsheviks and their popular support and often underestimated giving the Bolsheviks no popular mandate. The Bolsheviks did have some popular mandate but the Soviets radicalism was the main factor, which allowed the Bolsheviks to takeover. Without their radicalism and want for change and Bolsheviks wouldn't have been able to gain support and unite their antagonisms. Therefore the Soviets were a necessary factor and of great importance in the October revolution. Maya Wegrzyn 13BLK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    Lenin's reputation dropped dramatically and Bolshevik support fell. However during the Kornilov Revolt, Kerensky claimed that Kornilov was attempting treason and a military coup. Although Kornilov was arrested, Kerensky's position in the Provisional Government was weakened and Bolshevik popularity grew. Anyone who had been seen providing support for Kornilov was discredited, and every political party, apart from the

  2. Russia, 1905 - 1917, The Causes of Revolutionary Change. Using your knowledge of the ...

    He thought that if he could get rid of the Provisional Government somehow, then the Tsar might be re-instated as the rightful leader of Russia. Kornilov planned to March his army to Petrograd and retake power by forceful means if necessary.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    He had achieved significant things for the Bolsheviks and was undoubtedly a real asset to them. He was the organiser, the rationaliser and ideological inspirer that the Whites crucially lacked. Without him the Bolsheviks would not have been in power, let alone have any chance of winning a Civil War.

  2. The Bolshevik Consolidation of power 1917-21.

    * With that strategy the reds exhausted the whites as an attacking force and they surrendered. * Trotsky's organisation and leadership of the Red Army was a major factor in the survival of Bolshevik Russia. The Kronstadt Rising, 1921. * Bolshevik victory in the civil war didn't stop Bolshevik coercion.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    In the economic disorder of revolutionary Russia, this meant fighting perpetually with the Provisional Government over pay, but also demanding (and winning) the right for Vikzhel members to have the "first claim" to food supplies, once military needs had been covered.

  2. The Bolshevik Consolidation of Power 1918-21.

    Not all Bolsheviks shared this vision. There remained those in the party (LRs) who were convinced that their first task was to drive out the German imperialists. However, Lenin insisted on political unity, and his points of view were accepted.. Lenin's gamble that circumstances would soon make the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk meaningless had paid of.

  1. How important was Lenin in bringing about the Bolshevik revolution of November 1917?

    - and from stray bullets. The main fictional source of propaganda; the film 'October', can not be used as evidence because it was filmed in 1927, and in 1917 cameras where not yet sophisticated enough to film in the dark, so its night scenes of the revolution couldn't have been filmed.

  2. Assess the view that the Bolshevik rule from 1917 to 1924 was shaped more ...

    this point Russia had lost its influence and political power in Finland which had become fully independent. Russia still controlled at this point the Baltic?s states (which it would later lose power in) Ukraine was another area Lenin controlled, but there were independence movements gaining prominence in Ukraine at this time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work