• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the importance of the Soviets to the Bolshevik seizure of power in 1917.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the importance of the Soviets to the Bolshevik seizure of power in 1917. Historians have widely debated the importance of the Soviets to the Bolsheviks seizure of power. Where the more liberal, western historians under emphasise the role of the Soviets and giving the Bolsheviks no popular the mandate, Soviet historians over emphasise their role. Soviet historians give too much credibility to the Bolsheviks support from the Soviets. In fact although the Soviets did give some popular support to the Bolsheviks their importance lies, in their own radical nature and desire for change, which allowed Lenin and the Bolsheviks to use them and turn it into the 'October revolution' as we know it today. The Soviets were important in allowing the Bolshevik takeover due to their own radical nature. Throughout September and October the soviets became a lot more politicised and radicalised. Through their want for change, they actively went against the capitalist rule. By October bread rations were half of what they had been in February and this resulted in many strikes. Within the workforce there was widespread popular movement for an eight hour day, wage increases and workers being allowed to run their own factory. ...read more.

Middle

There is no doubt that there was a popular want for change however we must question whether it was economic motivation or political motivation. There were many unorganised groups whom formed their own organization and were of the most radical groups but had a low level of political consciousness. This is evidence for the Liberal interpretation that there was no popular mandate for the Bolsheviks but a more general movement. However in saying this, it must be taken into account when using evidence from liberal western historians the tensions during the cold war. The tensions between communist Russia and the Capitalist west causes the Liberal historians to stress the limitations of the Bolsheviks in gaining mass popular support. Moreover, we must acknowledge that many of the workers, identified with Bolshevik party line. They agreed with the hatred of the war, bitterness to the Bourgeoisie and moreover, had a drive for local level democracy through the local soviets and factory committees. This shows a commitment to socialism and not just change. We see this commitment and popular support of the Bolsheviks from the Soviets in the November election within the urban working class where they won 70% of the vote. ...read more.

Conclusion

This shows Lenin's popular mandate was almost completely distributed in Petrograd. Lenin used slogans such as 'all power to the Soviets' to try and mask the takeover as popular and the Bolsheviks having a majority when at no point was this the case. However the role of the Soviets can not be ignored, although the Bolsheviks had no popular mandate outside of Petrograd they still managed to takeover which shows further importance of the Soviets. The Bolsheviks managed to takeover through the Soviets giving them Petrograd and paving the way for them while having no popular mandate in the rest of Russia. To conclude, debate whether the Soviets were important is often overestimated giving full credit to Lenin and the Bolsheviks and their popular support and often underestimated giving the Bolsheviks no popular mandate. The Bolsheviks did have some popular mandate but the Soviets radicalism was the main factor, which allowed the Bolsheviks to takeover. Without their radicalism and want for change and Bolsheviks wouldn't have been able to gain support and unite their antagonisms. Therefore the Soviets were a necessary factor and of great importance in the October revolution. Maya Wegrzyn 13BLK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Account For the Success of the Bolsheviks in October 1917

    Why should opposition groups recognise such a government? The Bolsheviks were careful not to affiliate itself with the Provisional Government because it wanted to disassociate itself from government's many failed policies and it also wanted to remain a small, hardcore, tightly knit net of ardent Marxists, without any Bourgeois influences.

  2. Russia, 1905 - 1917, The Causes of Revolutionary Change. Using your knowledge of the ...

    Kornilov was a general who was fighting on the front. He was a keen supporter of the Tsar and the Tsarist system in the whole, and thought that the Provisional Government was doing a bad job of ruling over Russia.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    During the Civil War one of Lenin's objectives was the difficult but crucial task of organising the food and industrial production in the Red area. It was vital that the army was equipped and had supplies of food if they were to win the war.

  2. The Bolshevik Consolidation of power 1917-21.

    * Trotsky's basic plan was to defend the reds internal lines of communication and prevent the whites from maintaining regular supplies and concentrating their forces in one area. * Trotsky also maintained control of the railways which gave the reds an advantage because they were able to transport large numbers of troops quickly to key areas of attack or defence.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    In the economic disorder of revolutionary Russia, this meant fighting perpetually with the Provisional Government over pay, but also demanding (and winning) the right for Vikzhel members to have the "first claim" to food supplies, once military needs had been covered.

  2. The Bolshevik Revolution In October-November 1917

    him which were the Bolsheviks, so Kerensky gave the Bolsheviks rifles to their secret force the Red Guard which had been training secretly. In the end the railway worker stopped the trains carrying the troops and other workers had persuaded the Cossack troops not to fight.

  1. Was Bolshevik takeover popular?

    Opposition to Lenin further developed when the Provisional Government claimed that he was acting as a German spy and receiving financial aids from the German Government. His own party had to be won round to the idea of an armed takeover during the committee meetings of the 10th October.

  2. How important was Lenin in bringing about the Bolshevik revolution of November 1917?

    The myth of the Bolshevik revolution is shattered by statistical facts about the night of 6th November. How can the Bolshevik propaganda and re told history be correct about the violent storming of the Winter Palace with guns and fire a blazing when only five soldiers and one sailor died?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work