• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the importance of the Soviets to the Bolshevik seizure of power in 1917.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the importance of the Soviets to the Bolshevik seizure of power in 1917. Historians have widely debated the importance of the Soviets to the Bolsheviks seizure of power. Where the more liberal, western historians under emphasise the role of the Soviets and giving the Bolsheviks no popular the mandate, Soviet historians over emphasise their role. Soviet historians give too much credibility to the Bolsheviks support from the Soviets. In fact although the Soviets did give some popular support to the Bolsheviks their importance lies, in their own radical nature and desire for change, which allowed Lenin and the Bolsheviks to use them and turn it into the 'October revolution' as we know it today. The Soviets were important in allowing the Bolshevik takeover due to their own radical nature. Throughout September and October the soviets became a lot more politicised and radicalised. Through their want for change, they actively went against the capitalist rule. By October bread rations were half of what they had been in February and this resulted in many strikes. Within the workforce there was widespread popular movement for an eight hour day, wage increases and workers being allowed to run their own factory. ...read more.


There is no doubt that there was a popular want for change however we must question whether it was economic motivation or political motivation. There were many unorganised groups whom formed their own organization and were of the most radical groups but had a low level of political consciousness. This is evidence for the Liberal interpretation that there was no popular mandate for the Bolsheviks but a more general movement. However in saying this, it must be taken into account when using evidence from liberal western historians the tensions during the cold war. The tensions between communist Russia and the Capitalist west causes the Liberal historians to stress the limitations of the Bolsheviks in gaining mass popular support. Moreover, we must acknowledge that many of the workers, identified with Bolshevik party line. They agreed with the hatred of the war, bitterness to the Bourgeoisie and moreover, had a drive for local level democracy through the local soviets and factory committees. This shows a commitment to socialism and not just change. We see this commitment and popular support of the Bolsheviks from the Soviets in the November election within the urban working class where they won 70% of the vote. ...read more.


This shows Lenin's popular mandate was almost completely distributed in Petrograd. Lenin used slogans such as 'all power to the Soviets' to try and mask the takeover as popular and the Bolsheviks having a majority when at no point was this the case. However the role of the Soviets can not be ignored, although the Bolsheviks had no popular mandate outside of Petrograd they still managed to takeover which shows further importance of the Soviets. The Bolsheviks managed to takeover through the Soviets giving them Petrograd and paving the way for them while having no popular mandate in the rest of Russia. To conclude, debate whether the Soviets were important is often overestimated giving full credit to Lenin and the Bolsheviks and their popular support and often underestimated giving the Bolsheviks no popular mandate. The Bolsheviks did have some popular mandate but the Soviets radicalism was the main factor, which allowed the Bolsheviks to takeover. Without their radicalism and want for change and Bolsheviks wouldn't have been able to gain support and unite their antagonisms. Therefore the Soviets were a necessary factor and of great importance in the October revolution. Maya Wegrzyn 13BLK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The Bolshevik Consolidation of power 1917-21.

    * With that strategy the reds exhausted the whites as an attacking force and they surrendered. * Trotsky's organisation and leadership of the Red Army was a major factor in the survival of Bolshevik Russia. The Kronstadt Rising, 1921. * Bolshevik victory in the civil war didn't stop Bolshevik coercion.

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    He had achieved significant things for the Bolsheviks and was undoubtedly a real asset to them. He was the organiser, the rationaliser and ideological inspirer that the Whites crucially lacked. Without him the Bolsheviks would not have been in power, let alone have any chance of winning a Civil War.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Politically, Vikzhel sought a stable environment in which it could maintain the privileged position which its members had gained after the February Revolution. While it mouthed the usual revolutionary epithets, Vikzhel did everything possible to maintain the status quo. One of the reasons why the Kornilov Revolt was derailed in

  2. The Bolshevik Revolution In October-November 1917

    However, Lenin pushed them into making their successful revolutionary take over by using all his determination, leadership, and (oratory) skills. On the 7th of November Lenin's new talent Trotsky organised the take over of the city. It was no secret; the newspapers carried articles about it and the Bolsheviks distributed leaflets.

  1. The Bolshevik Consolidation of Power 1918-21.

    The Reds remained in control of a concentrated central area of Western Russia which they were able to defend by maintaining their inner communication and supply lines. Petrgorad, Russia and the railway network remained in their hands throughout the war.

  2. How important was Lenin in bringing about the Bolshevik revolution of November 1917?

    While Lenin hid in the Bolshevik headquarters, Trotsky came and went to update him with the latest news. He wrote in "My Life", "I roamed about the building from one floor to another to make sure everything was in order and to encourage those who needed it."

  1. Was Bolshevik takeover popular?

    Opposition to Lenin further developed when the Provisional Government claimed that he was acting as a German spy and receiving financial aids from the German Government. His own party had to be won round to the idea of an armed takeover during the committee meetings of the 10th October.

  2. Assess the view that the Bolshevik rule from 1917 to 1924 was shaped more ...

    state which cared for the interests of all working class people whatever their nationality?. Maybe this was arrogance on Lenin?s part expecting different people to just conform to a state which most of the nationalities did not elect and some did not want the Bolsheviks in power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work