Assess the reasons for the development of the Cold War

Authors Avatar by mohsinakhtar123 (student)

ASSESS THE REASONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE COLD WAR IN EUROPE FROM 1945 TO 1948

It is difficult to solely blame the Cold War on a single person; it developed as a series of chain reactions as a struggle for supremacy, predominantly between 1945 and 1948. Due to the stark contrast between both communist and capitalist ideologies between the Soviet Union and the Western Allies, it can be argued that the Cold War was inevitable and is not the fault of anyone. However, many of the tensions which existed in the Cold War can be attributed to Stalin’s policy of Soviet expansion and as a result of this the vast majority of the blame for the outbreak of the Cold War can be blamed on the Soviet Union and Stalin’s foreign policies, which contributed enormously to the Cold War.

It is widely known that by 1945, there was already a mutual dislike between the Soviet Union and the Western Allies – they only had a common enemy which was Germany. However, only a week before the Second World War has commenced, Stalin had signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact with Germany, and were allied with them. It is argued that this was solely a defensive measure, but this is an example of why the Western Allies saw Stalin as untrustworthy. In addition to this,  Stalin had refused to join the United Nations for a long time, which particularly angered USA. Conversely, USSR disliked Britain and USA, as they had delayed D-Day numerous times; Stalin believed this was a plot to allow Germany to weaken the Soviet Union. Stalin also believed that the Western Allies didn’t help the USSR enough in the Second World War, where they faced the highest number of casualties of all the countries involved. As well as this, at the Tehran Conference in 1943, Stalin and Churchill clashed over how much control Stalin would have over the countries of Eastern Europe.

The Yalta Conference of February 1945 came across as a rather friendly affair, but there were early signs of tension behind the scenes. Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt did agree to certain things, such as dividing Germany into 4 zones occupied by France, Britain, USA and USSR and holding free, democratic elections in Eastern European countries. However, what the Western Allies considered ‘democratic’ differed to Stalin’s interpretation, and as a result of this he, as well as occupying a larger amount of Poland than initially indented which increase the Soviet sphere of influence, ensured Poland was a communist state, complying with his ideologies.  Stalin desired Polish land so much, as he wanted it to be a ‘buffer zone’ to stop potential western invasion of the Soviet Union – he didn’t want the country to face any further destruction. On the contrary, Roosevelt did not want Soviet Union totalitarianism in Europe as an extreme country, Germany, had just been fought in the Second World War! The Soviet Union did not want to see Germany strop again, which was a similar view that France had adopted in the Treaty of Versailles in 1919. It was during the Potsdam Conference of July 1945 that tensions really did surface. Stalin was angered that the USA had just used an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, unbeknownst to him – the possession of such weapon gave the USA a huge military advantage, something which Stalin was arguably jealous of. On the other hand, Stalin had invited non-communist Polish leaders to meet him in March 1945 and then subsequently arrested them; this allowed for many topics of argument at the Potsdam conference. The Allies had disagreed openly about many aspects, such as the details of how to divide Germany and the Russian influence over the countries of Eastern Europe. Within a few months of the conference, Truman came to believe that Stalin had not lived up to the ‘agreements’ which he made, and instead was trying to create a series of puppet states in Eastern Europe. The Soviets argued that ‘friendly’ regimes along their border were key to the defence of the Soviet Union, and that it was extremely unlikely that Western-style democratic elections could allow for a government which fits the Soviet mould. Truman was hostile, viewing Stalin’s actions as a true betrayal of everything that the Allies had fought for in their war against the Axis powers. Furthermore, it seemed that the vast majority of Americans and Eastern Europeans in fact agreed with him. The previously mentioned points outline the Soviet expansion west into Eastern Europe and broken election promises. The Western Allies were likely to have argued that Stalin was incredibly untrustworthy and it was near impossible to keep relations between the two opposite spectrums; it was clear that Stalin was attempting to extend his communist ideologies through Europe. Counter arguing this point, many Soviets would have declare that the actions Stalin took were purely defensive measures – he wanted to create a buffer zone to protect him from the capitalist West and he wanted the contrasting Soviet system protecting.

Join now!

Between 1945 and 1947, Stalin’s dominance in Eastern Europe was rapidly increasing. He adopted ‘Salami tactics’ in which he ensures, slice by slice, that 7 Eastern European countries had Communist governments, with the first being Albania. In many cases, he either led non-Communist leaders in to exile, or had them arrested and sometimes even killed, a course of action he took in Czechoslovakia. It is widely believed that this was in response to the ‘Iron Curtain’ speech that Winston Churchill had given in Fulton, Missouri in March 1946, where Churchill had called for a western alliance to combat the threat. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay