• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the reasons why opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the period 1855-1964.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the reasons why opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the period 1855-1964. In 1855, opposition to the Tsarist regime lacked an effective unifying ideology. This remained the case throughout the 1855-1964 period, even once the communists had seized power. The lack of unity opposition possessed was a key factor in its failure throughout the period. Division in opinion and ideology were consistent problems for opposition, which only fully united in the February revolution. Even then there were still divisions in opinion, however there was one common cause to unite behind. Other attributing factors such as heavy repression by rulers, well timed reforms and the continuing use of military force ultimately meant that opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the 1855-1964. The peasantry were consistent opponents of Russian Government throughout the period, yet were rarely successful in doing so. One reason for this is the continuing role which the army played in limiting opposition from the peasantry, with military force frequently being deployed throughout the period. Lenin used it in the Civil War against the Green armies and Stalin used a similar style of brute force during the collectivisation process, albeit on a much grander scale. ...read more.


Military force was continually employed by the state, with Lenin crushing the Kronstadt mutiny in a similar effect to the Lena Goldfields massacre of 1912 and Bloody Sunday. The workers were controlled by the state throughout the period with Stalin's 5 year plans continuing the military discipline in the workplace which Lenin had introduced. Strikes under Alexander III in the 1880's did little to influence state policy. The revolutionary groups which became prominent in the 1870's lacked a unifying cause much like the peasantry and this often resulted in continual separation and division which limited their effectiveness. The Social Democrats had split into the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks in the same way that Land and Liberty had previously split into the Black Repartition and the People's Will. Again, these domestic opponents did enjoy some success. Not just the 1917 revolution, but also the concessions made in the October Manifesto and the assassination of Alexander II by the People's Will. All shared a common theme in that they were successes in the short term, but did not go according to plan in the long term. The deposition of the Provisional Government removed any possibility of a democratic Russia and the assassination had previously removed any chance of a constitutional monarchy. ...read more.


The threat of death, exile and imprisonment was used by the Russian state throughout the period, with Lenin intensifying Tsarist repression following a brief relaxation in Nicholas II's 1905 concessions. The failure of the Kronstadt mutiny demonstrated communist intolerance for opposition which Stalin would go on to intensify. Despite relaxation under Khrushchev, Stalinist repression had wiped out any opponents with similar effect to Alexander III and Lenin's use of the Okhrana and Cheka respectively. Unlike Tsarist Governments where repression had provoked opposition and increased tensions, repression and clever use of propaganda under communist Governments removed any possibility of opposition succeeding. Opposition to Russian Governments throughout the 1855-1964 period was rarely successful, whether it came from the peasantry, the intelligentsia, the workers or overseas. Heavy use of repression and the continuing deployment of military force were key factors, as was the clever use of propaganda by communist Governments in particular, such as the cult of Stalin. Even when opposition to Russian Government had succeeded, such as the removal of Nicholas II and the Provisional Government or the assassination of Alexander II, the events that followed were not successes as opponents had hoped for. In addition to Government intervention and reform, opposition consistently lacked a shared ideology and a common cause, so it was rarely successful throughout the 1855-1964 period. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    Lenin used it in the Civil War against the Green armies and Stalin used a similar style of brute force during the collectivisation process, albeit on a much grander scale. Tsars had also used military force in containing the peasantry, with Stolypin's necktie under Nicholas II and Alexander II continually employing military force prior to the Emancipation Act.

  2. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    Medvedev argues, "He was able to make simplifications of complex ideas which had the effect of vulgarising Marxism-Leninism." 10 Medvedev was a philosopher, not a historian and this quote, rather than being based on fact makes a generalisation of how Stalin adopted Leninism, failing to take into account the fact

  1. To what extent did Russia simply exchange one authoritarian regime for another in the ...

    Even though the communist regime looked ahead with their reforms, in contrast to the backward nature of the Tsars, both were implemented in the same authoritarian way. When implementing collectivisation and the 5 year plans, Stalin sought to maintain total control over the workers whilst eliminating any trace of opposition in order to maintain his authority.

  2. How far does a study of the period 1855 to 1956 suggest that, following ...

    Moreover, the 1921 ban on Factions limited the ability of lower down members in the party to challenge decisions made by the leadership. The fact that Lenin was too ill to enforce his wishes on diluting the power of the leadership illustrates that this was all set up for Stalin

  1. Explain why the opponents of the Tsars from 1855 to 1917 were more successful ...

    In contrast to the communist regime who were in receipt of total loyalty from the army, mutinies were commonplace in 1917, by which stage over 1 million had deserted, as well as 1905. This had forced Nicholas II's hand in making concessions through the October Manifesto, and later abdicating.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    The main argument that is made in a number of editorials comments on the Russian population in Toronto. At this time, people (especially of Russian descent) were up in arms about many verdicts that were established in Toronto. These articles simply state the idea that if you do not like

  1. How far could the fall of the Tsars be considered the most significant turning ...

    not appreciated by Russia as he wrote that Rasputin?s enemies charged him of being ?cynical?8 and of ?using his religion to mask his drive for sex, money and power?[8]. This weakness, when looked at with the other impacts of the war such as food shortages and economic problems, makes World

  2. Assess the reasons why opponents of Russian governments were rarely successful in the period ...

    Another example is the failing of the Narodnik or the ?going to the people movement? of 1877 orchestrated by the populists who failed mainly due to the fact that there was never a strong enough leader in place to achieve their aims.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work