• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the reasons why opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the period 1855-1964.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the reasons why opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the period 1855-1964. In 1855, opposition to the Tsarist regime lacked an effective unifying ideology. This remained the case throughout the 1855-1964 period, even once the communists had seized power. The lack of unity opposition possessed was a key factor in its failure throughout the period. Division in opinion and ideology were consistent problems for opposition, which only fully united in the February revolution. Even then there were still divisions in opinion, however there was one common cause to unite behind. Other attributing factors such as heavy repression by rulers, well timed reforms and the continuing use of military force ultimately meant that opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the 1855-1964. The peasantry were consistent opponents of Russian Government throughout the period, yet were rarely successful in doing so. One reason for this is the continuing role which the army played in limiting opposition from the peasantry, with military force frequently being deployed throughout the period. Lenin used it in the Civil War against the Green armies and Stalin used a similar style of brute force during the collectivisation process, albeit on a much grander scale. ...read more.

Middle

Military force was continually employed by the state, with Lenin crushing the Kronstadt mutiny in a similar effect to the Lena Goldfields massacre of 1912 and Bloody Sunday. The workers were controlled by the state throughout the period with Stalin's 5 year plans continuing the military discipline in the workplace which Lenin had introduced. Strikes under Alexander III in the 1880's did little to influence state policy. The revolutionary groups which became prominent in the 1870's lacked a unifying cause much like the peasantry and this often resulted in continual separation and division which limited their effectiveness. The Social Democrats had split into the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks in the same way that Land and Liberty had previously split into the Black Repartition and the People's Will. Again, these domestic opponents did enjoy some success. Not just the 1917 revolution, but also the concessions made in the October Manifesto and the assassination of Alexander II by the People's Will. All shared a common theme in that they were successes in the short term, but did not go according to plan in the long term. The deposition of the Provisional Government removed any possibility of a democratic Russia and the assassination had previously removed any chance of a constitutional monarchy. ...read more.

Conclusion

The threat of death, exile and imprisonment was used by the Russian state throughout the period, with Lenin intensifying Tsarist repression following a brief relaxation in Nicholas II's 1905 concessions. The failure of the Kronstadt mutiny demonstrated communist intolerance for opposition which Stalin would go on to intensify. Despite relaxation under Khrushchev, Stalinist repression had wiped out any opponents with similar effect to Alexander III and Lenin's use of the Okhrana and Cheka respectively. Unlike Tsarist Governments where repression had provoked opposition and increased tensions, repression and clever use of propaganda under communist Governments removed any possibility of opposition succeeding. Opposition to Russian Governments throughout the 1855-1964 period was rarely successful, whether it came from the peasantry, the intelligentsia, the workers or overseas. Heavy use of repression and the continuing deployment of military force were key factors, as was the clever use of propaganda by communist Governments in particular, such as the cult of Stalin. Even when opposition to Russian Government had succeeded, such as the removal of Nicholas II and the Provisional Government or the assassination of Alexander II, the events that followed were not successes as opponents had hoped for. In addition to Government intervention and reform, opposition consistently lacked a shared ideology and a common cause, so it was rarely successful throughout the 1855-1964 period. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    However Stalin and Khrushchev can be seen as similar as both leaders employed "cunning"8 and spin-doctoring. But there are clear differences, as Khrushchev lacked the temperamental nature of Stalin and the Tsars. He claimed Stalin was a "litsedi" meaning a man of many faces9, therefore there is a parallel between

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    Lenin used it in the Civil War against the Green armies and Stalin used a similar style of brute force during the collectivisation process, albeit on a much grander scale. Tsars had also used military force in containing the peasantry, with Stolypin's necktie under Nicholas II and Alexander II continually employing military force prior to the Emancipation Act.

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Napoleon, however, nursed the most serious grievance. Russian trade had been badly affected by the Continental System. At the end of 1810, Alexander wrecked Napoleon's trade embargo. He put tariffs on French imports and let neutral ships (no doubt carrying British goods)

  2. Explain why the opponents of the Tsars from 1855 to 1917 were more successful ...

    In contrast to the communist regime who were in receipt of total loyalty from the army, mutinies were commonplace in 1917, by which stage over 1 million had deserted, as well as 1905. This had forced Nicholas II's hand in making concessions through the October Manifesto, and later abdicating.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    two successors as leaders of the secret police.[56] These two, along with Rykov, confessed to all crimes and were sentenced to death along with fifteen others. Three of the accused escaped their live, being sentenced to prison terms Many historians argue that these show trials and purges were not credible, or supported by evidence.

  2. To what extent did Russia simply exchange one authoritarian regime for another in the ...

    In accordance with Marxist theory, the urban workers received a greater priority in contrast to the Tsars who preferred to focus on the peasantry. The two regimes were equally authoritarian, as one form of autocracy was simply exchanged for another.

  1. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    for the League or its strongest members to put the League to the bottom of its priority list. Britain suffered high unemployment and was not willing to get involved in international disputes, also the USA was not going to support economic sanctions when its own trade was in such a mess.

  2. Impact of the Russian revolution - Ideology matters.

    The first contradiction concerned the delayed outbreak of the promised world revolution. After all, it had already been sixty-nine years since Marx in the Communist Manifesto had proclaimed that "A Specter is haunting Europe-the specter of Communism." What had gone wrong?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work