• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the Reasons why Stalin's Political rivals were Unable to Prevent his Rise to Power

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the Reasons why Stalin's Political rivals were Unable to Prevent his Rise to Power Before 1917 the Bolshevik Party had only been a few thousand strong and Lenin had known the great majority of numbers personally. He had been impressed by Stalin's organising ability and willingness to obey orders. He once described him as "that wonderful Georgian". With Lenin's backing, by 1912 he had become one of the six members of the Central Committee, the policy-making body of the Bolshevik Party. He helped found the party's newspaper which was called Pravda. One theory suggesting Stalin's rise to power is that his opponents, such as Trotsky, Kamenev and Zinoviev, failed to unite against him, and that they did too little too late. One of the reasons Stalin was allowed to rise to power was that the other leading members of the Communist party failed to recognise him as a threat. ...read more.

Middle

His "race" were seen as outsiders. Other party members saw Trotsky as arrogant and dismissive - they respected him but did not feel any affection or loyalty towards him. It was thought that he would be most likely to cause a split in the party. When, Joseph Stalin came to power, he made the decision to modernise the Soviet economy. He wanted to generate wealth, and therefore improve the quality of life. Russia was behind from the rest of Europe, and Stalin wanted to "prove" that communism actually worked. In 1927, Stalin launched the "revolution from above" by setting two goals for the Soviet Union, rapid industrialisation and collectivisation of agriculture. His aims were to erase all traces of the capitalism and to transform the Soviet Union as quickly as possible into an industrialised and completely socialist state. Some might say luck played a large role in Stalin gaining power, something his opponents could not prevent. ...read more.

Conclusion

Trotsky's policy of Permanent Revolution focussed on spreading revolution and heading towards world revolution. On the other hand, Socialism in one country was the name given to the policy that Stalin promoted, and focussed on strengthening the revolution in Russia. This gave the Russians a special historic role and meant that they would not have to go to war. In conclusion, those that had the skill to oppose Stalin, like Trotsky, didn't realise how much of a threat was and failed to unite against him. He also had a great deal of luck - Lenin's criticisms of him in his testament were not made public, and he had the charge of factionalism to use to discredit anyone who opposed him. However, perhaps above all the most important reason was Stalin's megalomaniac personality, which made him an ideal dictator. Some have commented on his short height, suggesting that he had a tendency to keep himself to himself and was a "loner". Even the number of executions declined after his death. He was mad, evil and ruthless. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How did Joseph Stalin rise to power?

    As a result Trotsky had to step down as commissar of the army and therefore lost a lot of his political influence. Seeing as Trotsky was one of Stalin's main political opponents this also helped Stalin in his rise to power.

  2. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    They were forced to have a full time job, look after the home and to have more children. Abortion became illegal and he encouraged women to have more children, larger benefits were given to larger families. In the short term, this encouraged bigger families whilst increasing the amount of workers as well.

  1. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    Their ideological stance dramatically altered according their target audience and the political/social context of the time. This is epitomised by the changes between 1919 - where the Fascist message stressed anti-clericalism, democracy and social welfare in a more radical programme - and 1921 - where a more right-wing programme was

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    What they would have done will never be known. Perhaps they would have formed a new bloc, or joined forces with the Mezhraionsty. The possibility of a new bloc should be strongly emphasized. Historically revolutions have been dominated by blocs created during the progress of the revolution.

  1. The Rise of Communism In Russia

    It convened in Brussels in the summer of 1903, but was forced by the interference of the Belgian authorities to move to London, where the proceedings were concluded. The Second Congress was the occasion for bitter wrangling among the representatives of various Russian Marxist Factions, and ended in a deep

  2. The Rise of Communism In Russia

    It convened in Brussels in the summer of 1903, but was forced by the interference of the Belgian authorities to move to London, where the proceedings were concluded. The Second Congress was the occasion for bitter wrangling among the representatives of various Russian Marxist Factions, and ended in a deep

  1. How and why did Stalin rise to power?

    When Lenin died, he left Stalin in a good position to rise to power. He had already obtained great power working as the Party General Secretary, and by taking on the jobs that no other members of the Politburo wanted.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    The similarities these two figures had were in first place the use of terror that Stalin and Lenin employed as a political weapon in different circumstances: Lenin resorted to terror when the Bolshevik regime was fighting for survival, but at the same time of Stalin�s purges there was no major internal thereat to the regime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work