• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the reasons why the Conservative party remained in power from 1951 to 1964.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Beatrice Cohen History ? Britain Mr Bull TITLE: Assess the reasons why the Conservative party remained from 1951 to 1964. (25 marks) There are many arguments as to how the Conservatives managed to remain in power for thirteen long years. The reign began when Churchill was made Prime Minister for a second time in the 1951 election. Many say that although Churchill suffered ill health and was too old a frail to be a decisive figurehead, he was made Prime Minister as a way of thanks from the British public, for being such a good wartime leader. Additionally, the Conservative party as a whole appealed to the wider population due to the influx of bright, young tory members of parliament, against the tiring, old Labour government. Another point is that, Conservatives had recovered from the initial shock of losing the 1945 election, and reorganised its campaign in a strictly organised manner, ready to fight for seats and votes. From 1951 until the late 1970?s, there seemed to be an apparent consensus between the Labour and Conservative parties. ...read more.

Middle

This tactic proved inappropriate and he adopted deflationary measures including tax and interest rate rises, cuts in public spending, as a result, in an attempt of limiting wage increases. To regain lost popularity, Macmillan returned to an expansionist budgetary policy in 1963, whereby taxes and interest rates were once again lowered. As a consequence, a boom in consumer spenditure began. Demand for goods could not be met and so consequently the import of foreign manufactures rose. The net result was that by 1964, Britain had a balance of payment deficit of over £800 million. Stop-go and stagflation was introduced due to Britain’s lack of economic strategy. The indicated the failure of governments to develop policies that encouraged a constantly performing economy. The policy of stop-go was that when consumption and rises rose too quickly, the government should intervene to take control. Macmillan’s government continued to follow stop-go economics. Despite any criticisms, Macmillan was determined to portray the message that Britain had never had it so good. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, the empire wanted freedom and therefore it was impossible for Britain to ?abandon? them; they were just providing their colonies with the freedom they craved. Overall, the financial problems which Britain faced did not prevent the vast popularity from gaining material goods. This meant the people?s confidence in Conservatives was high as their government were able to sustain this. I believe that the economic circumstance at the time Conservatives came to power did suffice have an element reason as to how the party stayed in power for so long. This is because they were not in a major economic difficulty and thus confidence was relatively high. Therefore, all the Conservatives had to do was maintain the optimism and adjust elements of finance that needed assistance. Macmillan does deserve a lot of the credit for the Conservative reign of thirteen years, and rightfully earned the nickname ?Supermac?. He cut income tax in the 1959 budget, he had industrial production racing ahead and unemployment was falling. The sharp rise in living conditions moved Britain forward in worldwide circumstances and enabled the Conservatives to stay in power between 1951 and 1964. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    However, his true motives must be harshly questioned to assess whether he truly does deserve the title of a liberator. The reforms Alexander did establish did not bring around complete liberation for the peasants and despite the perceptible need to bring Russia forward socially and economically, the reforms never truly tackled the issues in-depth.

  2. East of Eden: An Interpretation

    What motivated Lee through life was unclear. It had to have been his dreams that he often talked about and longed to accomplish. But what about after he had no dreams left? He had even said that after trying out life in his San Francisco bookstore that he had no more dreams left.

  1. The Foreign Policy failures of British Governments in the years 1951- 1964 were due ...

    West Germany as part of NATO as well as the nation?s participation in the Cold War placed immense pressure upon the country?s finances such as building nuclear weapons which it could no longer afford. Hence, Britain at this time was simply delusional in believing it remained to be the power it once was because the country lacked realism.

  2. What were the reasons for the Conservatives losing the 1964 election?

    Therefore the inclusion of social benefit and getting rid of prescription charge was a way to save the people?s money and create

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work