• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the role of the nobility in providing political stability in Tudor England

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the role of the nobility in maintaining political stability in Tudor England. The nobility's role during the Tudor era was something of great importance in the maintenance of political stability, despite undergoing a dramatic change throughout the 16th century. Although not all nobles remained loyal to the Crown, the Tudors relied heavily on them as councillors, administrators and as military leaders, chiefly due to their desirable attributes including prestige, wealth and importance. The nobility however was not the sole factor in maintaining stability; the clergy, the gentry, local authorities and of course the monarch had significant parts to play in the keeping of authority. The Crown depended on the nobles a great deal, for instance all Tudor monarchs used the nobility as a source of advice, Henry VII summoned five great councils of the nobles and in the suppression of Lovel and Simnel he consulted with nobles such as Oxford and Pembroke. Pembroke again assisted Henry VIII with Wyatt's rebellion and both Henry and Elizabeth held assemblies of nobles in the 1530s and 1580s to discuss matters of state. Elizabeth, although only including one noble in her council of 1601, still expected every peer and leading gentleman to attend the royal court intermittently to pay his respects. ...read more.

Middle

The nobility was never far from the monarch but nonetheless, not all of the Tudor nobles were loyal to the Crown. After the Wars of the Roses there still remained a few noble families who were unwilling to accept Henry VII as the rightful Tudor king, Henry understood that they were indispensible to the maintenance of political stability but recognised he would have to limit their power if they began to act independently. Measures were taken to regulate their power so they couldn't build up private armies or ammunition against him. Still, Henry VII had to face rebellions that were led or supported by nobles such as the Pilgrimage of Grace led by Lord Hussey and Lord Darcy; Yorkist nobility also supported many minor rebellions. Even Elizabeth faced revolts from the Northern Earls and the Earl of Essex in 1601. The Crown knew that they wouldn't be able to survive without the nobility but at the same time they were wary of them, especially at the beginning of the period. However, by the end of Elizabeth's reign they had undergone a dramatic change based on the decline of feudal relations with their tenants and an interest in humanism; instead of military honour, war and violence which had previously influenced them socially, they showed good lordship, peace and civility. ...read more.

Conclusion

Propaganda was a technique used by the Crown to accentuate the ideas of power and authority which is linked with their ability to control pamphlets and church services, imposing paintings were also commissioned to add to the impressive image. The Crown also had at its disposal the means to win over and keep the political nation subservient like the ability to award honours such as peerages and knighthoods. In conclusion, it must be seen that the nobility was an important factor in maintaining political stability in Tudor times. The monarchy would not have been able to cope without their advice, imposing image and above all, their ability to retain men. Whilst ostensibly the JP's and the gentry had a huge practical role to play in the overall running of the country, there is no doubt that they were kept in line by the nobility. Nevertheless the institution of monarchy was the most important overall as the monarch was the source of unity and authority in the kingdom and was directly responsible for the protection of his or her subjects. Although the nobility were primarily responsible for putting down rebellions, they did so only as the instrument of the Crown - and so cannot be seen as the sole factor in maintaining stability. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is a superb response that offers a balanced and accurate answer to the question with an impressive amount of evidence used in support. Some references to historiography would have improved it further. 5 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    It involved two Marian exiles attacking the Religious Settlement as not Protestant enough, and was taken extremely seriously, with both men dismissed. Although it seems now like a trivial complaint it was displaying disobedience to God and the Monarchy as they went hand in hand, which could result in social

  2. Was Kenilworth a typical medieval castle?

    the building and maintenance of the castle and to help if the castle was under attack. Kenilworth stands on a naturally strong position as it was built 270 feet above sea level. With it being a great deal higher than surrounding land the castles occupiers were of great advantage as they could see attackers coming in advance and prepare.

  1. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    It could be said that Charles was trying to carry on the traditions of the King that had been passed onto him from his father, but he was neither politically experienced nor did he have the proper confidence to firmly establish the Divine Right.

  2. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    Britain at the time, but the fact was, Labour were held accountable. The economy's recovery was further hindered by the short-sighted "need" to remain a world power. This aim was ill-fated and in the eyes of many economists "obviously exceeded the country's economic capacity".

  1. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    George Abbot was one of these MP's. He was an evangelical Calvinist who showed hostility towards Puritans, however, he agreed with Puritan critics of James' regime, objecting to the presence of papists in the Privy Council.

  2. What Was The Main Cause Of The First English Civil War?

    Charles chose to oppose the Militia Ordinance by reviving the Commission of Array, which was a previously obsolete method of raising troops. Its aim was to basically prepare all fit inhabitants of a village for war, and this was the most obvious indication of all that the Civil War was inevitable.

  1. TO WHAT EXTENT WAS HENRY VI'S INCOMPETENCE THE PRIMARY CAUSE FOR THE OUTBREAK OF ...

    He became utterly withdrawn, bringing things to a head as a regent was needed to rule in Henry's name. The following events - York's loss of the regency, his raising of an army against the Queen resulting in the Queen's actions at her 'Parliament of Devils' - heightened tensions in the build up to the consequential wars.

  2. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    His reputation dramatically improved due to this as Pitt had tackled this problem quickly and efficiently and it had been going on for a long time, it had caught also out his predecessors and rivals, Fox and North.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work