• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the success of Bismarck's foreign policy with reference to: a) Keeping France isolated b) Keeping Russia and Austria - Hungary happy c) Maintaining European peace

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Bismarck's Foreign Policy Assess the success of Bismarck's foreign policy with reference to: a) Keeping France isolated b) Keeping Russia and Austria - Hungary happy c) Maintaining European peace During the majority of his time in German government, Bismarck found himself initiating and implementing schemes in order to keep France isolated, keep Russia and Austria - Hungary happy and to maintain European peace. He used his boundless intelligence and diplomatic skills in order to achieve these aims. Bismarck came to "power" in 1862 and by 1870 his first challenge had begun. Relations between Prussia and France had been weak and due to the potential unification of Germany, relations declined throughout the 1860's. France was keen to fight Prussia to prevent the unification of Germany and Prussia was equally keen to fight France, so as to complete the unification by taking control of the south Germanic states, e.g. Alsace Lorraine. Relations finally reached a low when war finally came in 1870, here the Prussians easily defeated France and Napoleon III was overthrown. Prussia then was able to take control of Alsace Lorraine. Then, it seemed, relations between the two countries were irreconcilable. Due to the loss of their emperor France was relatively weak and disorganized as a country, now having to adjust to a republican government system. It was at this point that Bismarck began his policy of French isolation. After the unification of Germany was complete, Bismarck realized that his newly created system could come under threat if the French decided to seek revenge. ...read more.

Middle

that Bulgaria had to split into three, in order to retain the power balance in the Balkans., Serbia, Montenegro and Romania remained independent of Turkey, Austria - Hungary was allowed to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina, Russia was allowed to take over Bessarabia , Karz and Batum and Britain was allowed to take over Cyprus for use as a naval base. Most countries were happy with this treaty as its main aims had been achieved; the power balance had been restored, there was peace in Europe and France again was isolated (this made Bismarck happy anyway.) Only one thing did not go quite to plan; Russia was very angry as they saw everything they had earned from the treaty of San Stefano slip away. They may have gained land, but so what? This land was insignificant, and they no longer had access to a warm water port. They felt that the congress had been a "European coalition against Russia under the Leadership of Prince Bismarck." The Dreikaiserbund had now fallen apart. After this turn of events Bismarck decided to focus on strengthening relations with Austria -Hungary. They formed a secret Dual Alliance; it was kept secret so as not to upset the Russian Tsar, who already thought that Bismarck's Foreign policies were Anti-Russian, and in the case of being found out, Russia may have taken offence and allied with France. Germany and Austria - Hungary agreed that in the event of an attack from Russia the other country would provide full military support. ...read more.

Conclusion

The second Dreikaiserbund temporarily settled them, but before long the tension between them and Austria -Hungary became unbearable, and it dissolved, pushing them further and further into the arms of France. So much so, that this would lead to an alliance between the two countries later on. But although this did not work out we must consider what an achievement it was that Bismarck managed to contain such tensions during the terms when the treaties did last, between two countries that were so culturally different. For any other diplomat, this is an impossible feat. In respect to peace in Europe Bismarck was very successful. He managed to resolve issues at the Congress of Berlin, which suited the majority of Europe, and so he managed to stabilize its situation and avoid even the concept of war until he resigned and even after that. Due to him there was no conflict in Europe from 1885 (Bulgaria against Serbia) until 1914. So although his treaty was successful it did leave unresolved issues that would ultimately result in the First World War. But how far these agreements go to be useful in the long term is questionable. Particularly as, when, not long after this Bismarck was forced to leave office and his delicate system was left in the clumsy hands of a pompous and clueless Kaiser where it all started to unravel... Bismarck is, to this day, considered to be the most significant German in history, which only partly credits him for his outstanding actions towards a potentially disastrous turn of events. If handled by anyone else German history may have been quite different. ?? ?? ?? ?? Charlotte McKenna ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the effectiveness of Napoleon III's foreign policy. How did his foreign policy affect ...

    too powerful, he made peace with Austria without consulting his Italian allies. He left Venetia under Austrian rule and forced Sardinia in return to give up Nice and Savoy for France. Although he could get Nice and Savoy, however, he lost the friendship of Italy and Britain.

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * The Spanish and Russian 'disasters' had sapped morale. * Armies had become too large for Napoleon either to control effectively or to ensure that they were properly supplied and fully trained. * Napoleon's early campaign had relied on mobility. Given, for example, that he had 600,000 men at the start of the Russian campaign, speed and flexibility were lost.

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    because they wouldn't have been able to exploit French disorganisation in terms of navigation and planning. Another reason why Prussia was able to defeat the French was because of superior artillery. Prussia had developed modern artillery since the war with Denmark in 1864, but against Austria this advantage with artillery

  2. Why was Prussia able to win the war with Austria in 1866?

    How could an empire stand against a foreign power when there was dissolution inside the empire particularly between the ethnic Germans and Hungarians. Austria was deeply divided and the Austria government did nothing to resolve this except using its strong iron fist once again.

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    and the highest organisation of the Party (Orgburo). * Head of Workers' and Peasants' Inspectorate 1919. This was set up to supervise the civil service and expose inefficiency, corruption, red tape and abuses of power. It gave Stalin the right to intervene in any and every area of government.

  2. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    Bismarck's next step appeared to be dealing with France and just as the Austro-Prussian War was a product of the Danish War, so it laid a basis for the Franco-Prussian War.11 The North German Confederation, created after Austria's defeat was a provisional solution, maintained until Kleindeutschland could be achieved.

  1. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    a chaotic collection of rival bureaucracies in perpetual power struggles with each other; He believes the Nazi dictatorship was not a totalitarian monolith, but rather comprised an unstable coalition of several blocks in a "power cartel". Unlike Structuralists, Consensus historians contend that Hitler was the driving force behind the Holocaust;

  2. AS Level Edexcel History Spain 1931-33 Revision Notes

    Production of iron fell massively. Government revenue fell because of the lack of funds they had. The new government faced lots of serious issues. The constitution of the Second Republic, December 1931 * They wanted a constitutional Cortes to establish the new constitution * Elections were held in June and Spanish voters gave overwhelming support to the Republic.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work