• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that Stalins suspicions of his western allies between 1941 and 1945 were justified

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the view that Stalin's suspicions of his western allies between 1941 and 1945 were justified Throughout the Second World War, there were many disagreements and causes for suspicion between the USSR and its allies in the west in the period 1941-1945. The four factors that will be investigated in this coursework, which are the Second Front, Poland, The Grand Alliance and the atomic bomb, were all issues that strained relations between these allies and caused suspicion between the two. Historian Bradley Lightbody argues that the Soviet Union expected their Western allies delayed the Second Front in the hope that the Soviet and Nazi armies would destroy each other. This would lead Stalin to be suspicious of his western allies as it appears that if what Lightbody argues were to be correct, then this would help the west in eliminating there pre-war threats in Communism with Stalin, and Fascism with Hitler. In his writing, Lightbody says, "800,000 Soviet soldiers and civilians were killed in the single battle of Stalingrad, compared to 375,000 British and 405,000 American casualties for the entire Second World War."1 This evidence is useful in justifying Stalin's suspicions of the west as it appears that Lighbody's view is true. However, after evaluating all the fighting that took place in the Second World War, it is clear that actually, Britain and America were not as involved as the USSR. Most of the casualties suffered by the USA were from fighting with the Japanese. ...read more.

Middle

and Taylor Downing strongly challenge this when they describe the actions of the Red Army in Poland in 1944 and argue that the hopes for post-war independence for Poland were crushed by Stalin. They argue their view that hopes for genuine democracy in Eastern Europe after the war was destroyed in the ruins of Warsaw. They give their evidence in their writing by saying, "the Soviet troops unexpectedly waited at the Vistula River, and allowed the Nazis to return and crush the Poles."5 This therefore adds weight to the argument that Stalin cannot be suspicious of his western allies as he is doing as much harm to the hopes of independence for Poland at the end of the war, as much as he thinks the west are doing as well. It must also be considered that a defenceless Poland would be easier for Stalin to control post-war, but since this is for personal gain it cannot be justified. It appears that after evaluating both arguments in this factor, it would seem that Isaacs and Downing are most credible because although Fitzgerald can give more evidence in his reasoning for Stalin's suspicions, he does not consider the damage that Stalin himself is doing to the situation and for this lack of consideration this is why Isaacs and Downing are more credible in their argument. Historian Scott Harrison argues that the alliance between the USSR and the Western Powers was liable to collapse in 1945. If the given view is true then one would assume that perhaps the west would purposely affect relations with the USSR as the alliance was only a marriage of convenience. ...read more.

Conclusion

It must also be considered that although America say the bomb was used to defeat Japan, the United States immediately attempted to turn the atom bomb to diplomatic advantage. Historian Oliver Edwards strongly challenges this with the view that the bomb was dropped because the Americans didn't want to spend the money on developing it without testing it, and because it would defeat Japan. Stalin had known that the reason in which the USA had entered the war was for the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour, meaning that the main enemy from the American point of view was the Japanese. Although by May 1945, Germany had surrendered in the war, there was still fighting going on between the USA and Japan, for example the Battle of Okinawa. In his writing Edwards says, "the bomb was dropped because $2 billion had been invested in its development and because it was seen as the best means of defeating the Japanese."10 The bombs dropped on the 6th August and 9th August 1945 at Hiroshima and Nagasaki forced the Japanese to surrender and it was for this sole reason that the bombs were dropped. When one considers the arguments the historians have given, the common theme appears that Stalin could not be justified in his suspicions of the west. This view is more convincing, not only because the historians have given better evidence or considered more events that could alter any suspicions Stalin might have, but also because Stalin himself acted in ways that were just as bad if not worse than the west, which cannot justify his suspicions of his western allies in the period 1941-1945. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is an interesting essay that considers all the key issues in the tensions of the Grand Alliance during WW2. Historiography is well understood and adds weight to the debate although at times, more evidence is needed to fully evaluate it. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 22/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire ...

    5 star(s)

    becoming almost essential to the economies of nations in Europe, being part of the Empire would help greatly to ensure trade between not only the subject and France, but also other subjects in the Empire, leading to more economic development, and benefit for subjects.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were Nazi economic policies in the years 1933-45?

    4 star(s)

    dependant on foreign supplies for on foreign supplies for one third of it's raw materials when war broke out. The economy was far from being mobilized when war had begun, but it was more so than Britain or France. Therefore the four year plan was successful to an extent in

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Major Causes of French Revolution

    4 star(s)

    It seems clear that if it could be proved that there was a genuine crisis, the Notables would have been prepared to take radical action to overcome it. Instead, they said that people from all estates meeting together could only agree such a tax.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years ...

    4 star(s)

    If public spending went down, so too did the governments income. This knocked on to affect industry and a cycle was created. It was not only felt in the consumer side of the economy. The industrial production was also dwindling.

  1. What were the effects of the First Five Year Plan on Russia?

    him while Hitler was hated all through Europe even after his good support in Germany. The more positive effects of Stalin's leadership was that by providing an idea of the ideal worker an all the propaganda it meant that to a certain degree people wanted to work and Stalin did not need to do anything to make them work.

  2. How did Joseph Stalin rise to power?

    This like the tragic death of his wife did not directly help Stalin but helped his campaign in the long run. This is due to the fact that 'The lessons of October' was used by Leon Trotsky to attack Kamenev and Zinoviev, this then led to them attacking him even more.

  1. What impact did war have on the French Revolution 1789-1799?

    for war had long since gone and most people wanted peace, and military defeats were beginning to surface once more, the most prominent of these the Battle of the Nile. The hefty reliance of the Directory on the army also created the possibility of there being a military coup, which

  2. To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War ...

    Again the evidence, if we take the Intentionalist view is that he had planned a war of aggression from the outset.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work