• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that the Bolshevik rule from 1917 to 1924 was shaped more by circumstance in Russia than by the party

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐By Daniel Harrington Candidate no: 5093 15b. Assess the view that the Bolshevik rule from 1917 to 1924 was shaped more by circumstance in Russia than by the party?s ideology? The Bolshevik party?s control of Russia after the revolution was not absolute they had many enemies and a counter revolution was always a possibility in their minds, Lenin even faced betrayal within his own party, even though his party had power, there was a fine line between power and absolute failure. Edward Acton?s book the ?Rethinking of the Russian Revolution? published in 1990, Acton states that ?To stress the responsiveness of the Bolshevik Party to pressures from below is not to deny the significance of the lead given by Lenin. His ability to combine theory with practice was unique? Acton is pointing out that without Lenin the party would struggle to even have gained power, but Acton makes a contradictory point stating that ?On the other hand, he [Lenin] was in no position to impose policy on the party. Again and again, his colleagues on the central committee showed themselves to be capable of opposing him?. ...read more.

Middle

When compared with Acton, the points Laver makes are in accord. They held that the party was holding back real change, and that you could view Stalin?s appointment by Lenin as a similar appointment to Kerensky appointing General Kornilov to control the military. Richard Pipes work ?Russia under the Bolshevik Regime 1919-1924? which was published in 1994 goes on to consider the success of Lenin?s policies. Pipes state?s that ?Once it had proven impossible to export communism (Trotsky?s main goal), the Bolsheviks in the 1920s dedicated themselves to constructing a socialist society at home. This endeavour failed as well?. ?Lenin had expected through a combination of expropriations and terror to transform his country in a matter of months into the world?s leading economic power?. What Pipes refers to is the growing disloyalty of once loyal followers but that is common of any government or party that has just gained power throughout the history of politics. Pipes goes onto state ?Lenin had expected the communist party to provide disciplined leadership to the nation: instead he saw political dissent which he had muzzled in the country, resurface within his own party?. ...read more.

Conclusion

the communist manifesto was written in industrialised Manchester it struggled to suggest what an arable based nation could do with Marx?s theory. Stalin?s appointment by Lenin is also a factor turning the nationalities against the Bolsheviks Stalin had his way after Lenin?s constitution was interpreted by Stalin to give him a free pass to crush the different nationalities and oppress those who had been oppressed by the Tsar and the provisional government before hand. The difficulties with communication across the country factors in with education with most people outside the major cities not having the ability to read it meant that the Bolshevik message was limited in a way. The education of the people is also a factor because if people like the surf?s could not read how were they to know what was going on in the country, it left the Bolsheviks with a large problem if the people didn?t understand what they were trying to do then how could they support him. Really the conclusion drawn from the interpretations is one of surprise that no one came along and just overthrew the Bolsheviks not for lack of trying however in history it looks like the Bolsheviks were overthrowing Lenin. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    material interests of the various groups which made up Russian society, and particularly to those groups in positions of power. The urban masses wanted bread, the soldiers wanted peace, and the peasantry sought land redistribution. Thus, the genius of Lenin's slogan "Bread, Peace and Land" is the way in which

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Another was to have a women weeping in the next cell mimicking the accused's wife. A Chronology of the main events of the Terror 1930-1938 1930-1 At first the purges concentrated upon technical experts, who Stalin blamed for the failures of the First Five Year Plan.

  1. Assess the impact of Lenin on Events in Russia between 1917 -1924

    This meant that the Bolsheviks could accuse anyone who spoke out against them as being a traitor and attempting a counter- revolution. This could be said to be a bad decision by Lenin as it lead to peasants refusing to give grain and caused upset among one of the Bolsheviks main support groups.

  2. Which Was the Most Important Reason for the Bolshevik Consolidation of Power By 1924, ...

    If they could revolt anyone could and they did. That spring many peasant revolts were crushed with similar ruthlessness. Lenin knew it was time for a change, it was becoming difficult to keep control. From 1921-1928 Lenin introduced the New Economic Policy (NEP).

  1. Soviet State

    * During the collectivisation years, over 5 million kulaks officially deported to Siberia, while several million were reportedly departing from their homelands. * A FISCAL VICTORY FOR THE GOVRNMENT - In the early 1930's, procurements and exports increased. In other words, the proportion of agricultural produce at the disposal of the government increased.

  2. Assess Lenin's strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924.

    This is again another prime example of Lenin?s ability to keep pushing forward until he got what he wanted. However, it must also be remembered that Trotsky played a major role in the the Bolshevik rise to power. Lenin was the influence while Trotsky was the organiser; he was the

  1. How significant was Lenin between the years 1902-1918 to the formation of the Bolshevik ...

    Thus, the views put forward in the Theses reflected those of the Russian proletariat and peasantry ? placing the BP at the forefront of the political scene: ?membership (of the party) rocketed? from around 100,000 to really 500,000.13 Therefore, one can credit Lenin for bringing the previously small Bolsheviks party, to the forefront of the revolution; winning votes and minds.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The USSR could not move forward into a socialist future if not everyone had the same vision of society. 4. Movement more towards the Capitalism that had been present under the Tsar rather than the Socialist future that the Communist party wanted.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work