• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that the failures of the provisional government were the main factors in enabling Lenin and the Bolsheviks to seize power

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐By Daniel Harrington Candidate no: 5093 15c. Assess the view that the failures of the provisional government were the main factors in enabling Lenin and the Bolsheviks to seize power. The Seize of power by the Bolsheviks means different things to different people, historian T. H. Von Laue argued that the Bolsheviks staged a limited coup in October 1917 in his book Why Lenin? Why Stalin? Published in 1971, Von Laue states that ?the communists were pioneers in the arts of activating and manipulating the fears and hopes of the common man? to this point most of Lenin?s work had been done within the safety of Finland away from the Russian Government and the Tsar. Von Laue goes on to state that ?they (the Bolsheviks) raised extravagant illusions and held out a promise, certified by the laws of war? and Von Laue goes onto describe the Bolshevik takeover as a minor event that was only important in retrospect. Von Laue brings up a great point that the Bolsheviks had a lot of support in the Russian heart land , but they lacked support in the big cities like Petrograd, where there rivals the Mensheviks and the popular SR?s (Socialist Revolutionaries) were more established. Von Laue end with a question how with all the circumstances (the Bolsheviks lack of support in the cities and in areas of ethnic minorities of non-Slavic people) ...read more.

Middle

Though both Acton & Von Laue agree on one thing, that the Bolshevik Manifesto directly recognised the struggle of the people and offered solutions the people wanted to hear. Like end starvation, reform the factories. The reality was that the cold and anarchy played an important part in the Bolsheviks taking power despite how big or small the party was. The next interpretation for Orlando Figes in the book ?A People?s Tragedy: The Russian Revolution, 1893-1924?, published in 1996. Figes brings emphasis to the Kornilov crisis and the role that the Bolsheviks played within the crisis. Figes states that the Bolsheviks would not have gained power without the Kornilov crisis. The fact that many political prisoners were released after this crisis helped the Bolsheviks, because of their key role in resolving the situation. Kornilov was appointed by Kerensky, the leader of the provisional government at the time. The Kornilov Crisis started with an appointed general of the Russian army(Kornilov) turning on the government; Kornilov was appointed by the provisional government and would go on to run parts of the army. Kornilov revolted against the government and got his troops to turn their guns at Petrograd and planned to storm the parliament in order to end the anarchy that was happening at the time. When the provisional government learned of these plans they faced a dire situation because who would protect the city of Petrograd from the ...read more.

Conclusion

Acton writing 19 years previously had claimed that Party membership had been a reason of the Bolshevik take over but Acton does not mention this in his work with Stableford. One thing that Figes Acton & Stableford all have in common is that they don?t see the Bolshevik take over as a minor event and therefore they all disagree with Von Laue. Von Laue?s ending question ?How did a small minority take over Russia?? Is answered, in that the Bolshevik leadership may have been a small number of people but they had millions of people supporting their cause. That is by no means a small minority. Von Laue does answer his own question though in his opening line ?the communists were pioneers in the arts of activating and manipulating the fears and hopes of the common man? In conclusion the Bolshevik?s took power because of a number of failures but also because of their own decisions to stay out of government unlike their rivals to Menshevik?s. The Provisional government failed because of Kornilov and Kerensky?s appointment of Kornilov into a high ranker military position, the fact that the Bolshevik?s saved the government and the people which made them Martyrs and heroes to the people and that by the end no matter what Kerensky or the government did people still suffered and the Bolshevik?s adapted to the changing situation in Russia. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    despised, and the expression of it harshly repulsed.'7 However, this can be justified, as the primary objective was to secure the North Eastern border of France, and Belgium by herself would have been considered dangerously vulnerable to future French aggression, because of its proximity to France.

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    Fascist volunteers kept services running throughout the strikes, discrediting the CGL and ensuring that the reformist Socialists would not be in the next government. This is an example of how the Left unknowingly helped the Fascist cause. They were weakened by the strike and their own violence had meant that much of the Fascist's own brutality was overlooked.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    of workers and that the real plan was to transfer 1281 workers and fire all the rest. The plan was of course blocked. Similar events took place at other factories in Petrograd. In order to enforce their decisions not to permit the transfer of equipment and not to tolerate layoffs or firings, the factory committees required an armed wing.

  2. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    This significantly helped the Bolshevik's Party revitalisation. On the 3rd September, Leon Trotsky was released and immediately assumed control of the Bolshevik faction in the Petrograd Soviet. Militants already discredited with Kerensky over the Kornilov revolt, were appalled as he gave in to the whims of the Bolshevik party.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    paired each Tsarist with a loyal Bolshevik commissar, known as a 'Politruk'. The officers could not give orders unless a Politruk approved them. He also imposed the harsher measure of taking hostage of one member from a Tsarist officer's family, a fierce tactic that worked quite well and gave him control of his army.

  2. How significant was Lenin between the years 1902-1918 to the formation of the Bolshevik ...

    Within the document, Lenin stresses there must be no cooperation with the PG (see source 3). In saying so, he had distanced himself from the SR and Mensheviks that had gone into government with the liberals, leaving his party as the only true radical one, and leaving the ?socialists (in government)

  1. Lenin's leadership was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power ...

    General Kornilov was appointed by Kerensky as an attempt to instil discipline, when Kornilov sent troops to Petrograd to seize power of the government Kerensky panicked and armed the Bolshevik Red Guard. Kornilov?s troops were halted by Bolshevik agents. This irretrievably damaged his, the Provisional Government and any party that had affiliated with them, like the Mensheviks.

  2. 'Stalin's leadership was the most significant reason for Soviet victory over Germany in the ...

    Furthermore there was an economic crisis in 19424, as a lot of money was being spent, but Russia was hardly getting any money. However Stalin was able to get over these losses with American lend-lease. But the USSR also had a shortage of skilled labour because it was the men

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work