• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that the failures of the provisional government were the main factors in enabling Lenin and the Bolsheviks to seize power

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐By Daniel Harrington Candidate no: 5093 15c. Assess the view that the failures of the provisional government were the main factors in enabling Lenin and the Bolsheviks to seize power. The Seize of power by the Bolsheviks means different things to different people, historian T. H. Von Laue argued that the Bolsheviks staged a limited coup in October 1917 in his book Why Lenin? Why Stalin? Published in 1971, Von Laue states that ?the communists were pioneers in the arts of activating and manipulating the fears and hopes of the common man? to this point most of Lenin?s work had been done within the safety of Finland away from the Russian Government and the Tsar. Von Laue goes on to state that ?they (the Bolsheviks) raised extravagant illusions and held out a promise, certified by the laws of war? and Von Laue goes onto describe the Bolshevik takeover as a minor event that was only important in retrospect. Von Laue brings up a great point that the Bolsheviks had a lot of support in the Russian heart land , but they lacked support in the big cities like Petrograd, where there rivals the Mensheviks and the popular SR?s (Socialist Revolutionaries) were more established. Von Laue end with a question how with all the circumstances (the Bolsheviks lack of support in the cities and in areas of ethnic minorities of non-Slavic people) ...read more.

Middle

Though both Acton & Von Laue agree on one thing, that the Bolshevik Manifesto directly recognised the struggle of the people and offered solutions the people wanted to hear. Like end starvation, reform the factories. The reality was that the cold and anarchy played an important part in the Bolsheviks taking power despite how big or small the party was. The next interpretation for Orlando Figes in the book ?A People?s Tragedy: The Russian Revolution, 1893-1924?, published in 1996. Figes brings emphasis to the Kornilov crisis and the role that the Bolsheviks played within the crisis. Figes states that the Bolsheviks would not have gained power without the Kornilov crisis. The fact that many political prisoners were released after this crisis helped the Bolsheviks, because of their key role in resolving the situation. Kornilov was appointed by Kerensky, the leader of the provisional government at the time. The Kornilov Crisis started with an appointed general of the Russian army(Kornilov) turning on the government; Kornilov was appointed by the provisional government and would go on to run parts of the army. Kornilov revolted against the government and got his troops to turn their guns at Petrograd and planned to storm the parliament in order to end the anarchy that was happening at the time. When the provisional government learned of these plans they faced a dire situation because who would protect the city of Petrograd from the ...read more.

Conclusion

Acton writing 19 years previously had claimed that Party membership had been a reason of the Bolshevik take over but Acton does not mention this in his work with Stableford. One thing that Figes Acton & Stableford all have in common is that they don?t see the Bolshevik take over as a minor event and therefore they all disagree with Von Laue. Von Laue?s ending question ?How did a small minority take over Russia?? Is answered, in that the Bolshevik leadership may have been a small number of people but they had millions of people supporting their cause. That is by no means a small minority. Von Laue does answer his own question though in his opening line ?the communists were pioneers in the arts of activating and manipulating the fears and hopes of the common man? In conclusion the Bolshevik?s took power because of a number of failures but also because of their own decisions to stay out of government unlike their rivals to Menshevik?s. The Provisional government failed because of Kornilov and Kerensky?s appointment of Kornilov into a high ranker military position, the fact that the Bolshevik?s saved the government and the people which made them Martyrs and heroes to the people and that by the end no matter what Kerensky or the government did people still suffered and the Bolshevik?s adapted to the changing situation in Russia. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    addressing the problem of the stateless nations was the 'most oblivious failure of the congress.'9 It can be argued that the many states making up Germany and Italy made them weaker than if they were united, and hence they were not strong enough to contain France, indicating that they failed in their primary aim.

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    The inability of the White armies to cooperate and work together efficiently gave the Bolsheviks a vital advantage. With a tougher opposition they may not have held their political position long, let alone win the War. The Whites divide and dispersion over large areas of Russia presented the Bolsheviks with problems of supply.

  1. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    This policy also gave him a useful indifference from the police who hated Socialism more than Fascism. By 1920 many rural Landlords and Urban Industrialists were willing to pay generously for the squads help against the threat of Socialism and trade unions.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Shortly after the party's adoption of the theses the Kronstadt soviet had produced a Bolshevik majority. It was the first body in all Russia to do so. The Bolsheviks also won points when they held firm against the death penalty, which the Provisional Government had reintroduced on the front in order to stiffen discipline.

  1. Why did 1917 end with Lenin in Power rather than Kerensky?

    The job of balancing the desire by the radicals for sweeping reforms, and also placating the more conservative of the Provisional Government members was the daunting task facing Kerensky. It could be suggested that these under-lying, fundamental problems made it inevitable that Kerensky would lose his power, and that revolution would occur.

  2. Lenin's leadership was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power ...

    However, it was not only Kerensky?s failures that created such an opportunity but the policies of the Provisional Government and its failure to deal with the problems of Peace, Bread and Land. The Provisional Government was illegitimate and unwilling to act effectively of the problems of Russia in 1917, allowing

  1. The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the ...

    Although the weakness of the Provisional Government and lack of support of the masses had given the Bolsheviks an advantage, another factor that bought the Bolsheviks to seize power was their organisation and use of effective slogans to gain support from the industrial workers, peasantry and soldiers.

  2. 'Stalin's leadership was the most significant reason for Soviet victory over Germany in the ...

    Because of the rapid industrialisation, the coal industry, for example, had unskilled and inexperienced workers and poor working conditions. Also there was a fall in productivity as one eighth of factories were moved to be secured. But many were too close.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work