• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that the Holocaust was mainly a result of a long term plan by Hitler to eliminate the Jews.

Extracts from this document...


Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that the Holocaust was mainly a result of a long term plan by Hitler to eliminate the Jews. Crucially, very few historians would now argue that the Holocaust itself; the carefully coordinated genocide of Europe's Jewish population, was a long term plan by Hitler. However, the very name, "Final Solution", clarifies the position of this policy as the culmination of a determined effort to achieve the fundamental racial objective which underpinned the Hitler's aspirations. The inherent centrality of anti-semitism to Hitler's ideology probably bears closest resemblance to a "long term plan", with the "clear and constant... eliminationist desire", as Passage C describes, the defining characteristic of the regime. Although Passage A, correctly stresses the significance of the war in intensifying the central importance of the Jewish Question, such urgency was undoubtedly a product first and foremost of the years of relentless anti-semitism which preceded, and the perpetuation of the sense of destiny explained by Hitler himself in "The Gemlich Letter" as early as Sept 1919, "It's final aim must unshakably be the removal of the Jews altogether". And, while Passage A attempts to portray subsequent radicalisation as an almost inevitable product of war by linking military success to logistical strain; Hitler was in fact instrumental more contemporaneously, with his oft-repeated "prophecy" making action critical in the light of the other alternative. ...read more.


After running for some time, the organized protest of Bishop von Galen encouraged Hitler to issue the stop order. Initially justified, by the personal plea from the father of a disabled child, the euthanasia programme was once more influenced by public opinion. However, this decision only prompted Hitler to try and remove the issue from the public consciousness by moving the killing centres further east and in many ways it was a case of 'out of sight, out of mind'. T4 cannot be seen directly as a dry-run for the Holocaust, but it clearly shows that Hitler was willing to orchestrate genocide to maintain the future of a stronger Germany through the Volksgemeinschaft. Importantly, the T4 programme in Germany was framed by intrusion of public voice, initially to justify and then to dissent; showing that the public character was not so unambiguous as Passage B suggests. Passage A argues that the Holocaust itself was not a" long term plan" with the example of Heydrich's proclamation of the Madagascar resettlement idea as "the territorial final solution". The policy was considered seriously in spite of the obvious logistical drawbacks, suggesting a desperate pursuit of any method which would guarantee the removal of Jews. ...read more.


But perhaps the length of this target was the crucial element to produce the psychological preparation required for circumstances of the war to escalate policy. The significance of the war is only realized through the response of the decision makers and it cannot be regarded as inevitable. The war presented a major logistical problem which went far beyond anything in proceeding years and called for more radical action. This urgency of the situation was enhanced by Hitler, who had long seen a European War against Jewish Bolshevism as the pivotal moment at which his ideology could be realized and his prophecy fulfilled. The seemingly spontaneous work of "men on the ground" cannot be separated from Hitler's will because it relied upon his charismatic presence and authorization. Although practicalities became the primary concern and Nazi policy was determined by the success of the initial Einsatzgruppen killing operation, the sense of relief brought by a "mercilessly consistent" final solution was only produced by years of struggle for achievement of the shared ideological objective. Whether or not Hitler ever meant for genocide when he talked of "elimination", will probably never be known, but the collision of a "coherent" long term target, and the intense pressure of war enforced radicalisation as a "solution" became desperate. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire ...

    5 star(s)

    Showing that, once again the benefits of the Napoleonic Empire would not be appreciated until after Napoleon?s reign. So overall, interpretation D is the more useful of the disagreeing interpretations as it mentions a wider spectrum benefits that Napleon offered, from modernization to nationalism, while also staying useful to answering the question throughout the interpretation.

  2. This essay will examine the rise of anti-Semitism from ancient times to the Holocaust ...

    At the end of the war the German nation had lost much of its pre-war territory. Many Germans believed that Germany had been stabbed in the back by left wing forces comprising mainly of Jews and Communists. This was also the belief of a former soldier called Adolf Hitler.

  1. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    It infers that although it may not have been his wish for one specific thing to occur, the occurrence of it would help to achieve the final goal and thus it was indirectly approved. So, theoretically, Kershaw is saying that the Nazi party knew that Hitler wished to create a

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    It may seem like all were supportive of Nazis, but this was not true! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Church Hitler preferred cooperation to conflict with the church by upholding traditional values. The Protestant and Patholic churches prepared to cooperate with him. In 1933 Protestants agreed to unite to form a 'Reich Church' electing a Nazi as their 'Reich Bishop'.

  1. Assess the view that the holocaust was due to a long term plan of ...

    Anti-Semitism to Radicalisation and then to Einsatzgruppen .Increased in vigorousness .Thus maintaining the view of [Interpretation C] that it was "goal directed" .Hitler had a goal an aim to achieve .This view is advocated by [Interpretation B] which states it was part of a "long list of measures .It wasn't a case of limited option but clear objectives.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    German policies toward the Jews were standard in world history because societies always tend toward biological ethnic homogeneity and are therefore justified in removing alien forces. In this view, ethnic cleansing is a necessary measure in order to maintain public health and hygiene.

  1. The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust. How valid is this assessment ...

    It is clear on the source that Hitler was not happy to have the Jewish people in Germany and that their actions would be detrimental to mankind. His own opinion is very important as it proves that he had already formulated prejudices against Jewish people and describes them as a "parasite".

  2. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    Consensus historians contend that the holocaust was a consequence of the coalescence of Nazi racial policy and a response to the circumstances induced by the war. This view is argued by the historian Ian Kershaw. Kershaw argues that a combination of Hitler?s fanatical racial ideology and other external factors leas to the attempted annihilation of the Jewish population.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work