• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Bismarck's Foreign policy was a Success." Is This Statement True?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Bismarck's Foreign policy was a Success." Is This Statement True? The balance of power in Europe had been suddenly altered after the German victory over France in 1871. The resultant German Empire, with its large population great economic power, strong army and extensive resources, looked clear to be an important factor in international relations. However, even for Bismarck this looked set to be a challenge, due to the need not only to establish the Empire as a nation, but to also found an external security that would prove to be vital throughout his reign as Chancellor. Although was this set policy an overall success? Bismarck's main objectives in the proposal of the instituted policies were to isolate France in Europe; maintain the balance of peace on the continent - particularly between Austria and Russia, who Bismarck feared would come to blows over the escalating problems in the Balkans - as well as maintaining his secured German territory; avoid fighting a war on two fronts and the Chancellor also desired, perhaps greedily, to have the control and power of two other powers in Europe as well as in Germany. The ideal for Bismarck was to establish a run of successful policies to achieve these goals and thus substantiate Germany as both the most powerful and influential of the Great Powers in Europe. ...read more.

Middle

Once more this was successful for Bismarck in that it isolated France and prevented the situation of having to choose between Austria and Russia. The final of Bismarck's foreign policies also secured successes for the Chancellor. The Triple Alliance of 1882 between Germany, Austria and Italy reassured Bismarck that unless a Franco-Russian alliance was formed then the prospect of war from either nation whilst standing alone could be easily contained. This alliance was, from Bismarck's viewpoint, aimed directly towards the segregation of France, as he was aware that she could not, and so would not attack Germany single-handedly. However, yet again the Dreikaiserbund was destroyed in 1885 due to further problems in the Balkans, and it became clear that disputes in this area were unlikely to ever be fully resolved. This time Bismarck needed to desperately to avoid the prospect of a war on two fronts. This concluded in the Reinsurance Treaty of 1887, which tried to localize the problem by assuring Russia that Bismarck would not support Austria in a clash over the Balkans territory. By documenting that in the case of a war between two of the powers that the remaining power would remain neutral, Bismarck succeeded in both preventing a war on two fronts and obtaining the neutrality he desired. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Reinsurance Treaty was very similar in that it was only short-term as France and Russia did eventually join in the 'Entente'. Bismarck further created himself problems, as the Second Mediterranean Agreement left him with no alliance to Russia, and so creating possible problems for the future. Finally by the end of Bismarck's office in 1890 France still viewed Germany with contempt and searched for revenge, while the situation in the Balkans continued to flare as did the tension between Austria and Russia. This leads me to believe that although Bismarck's foreign policy was successful in achieving his main objectives and solving problems in the short-term, all they did for the long-term was to simply delay the problems rather than resolving them. The Chancellor in fact made it difficult to maintain neutrality over the Balkans crisis in the long-term and it could even be said that too many alliances were made in an effort to obtain his goals, that it became too difficult to retain such a documented relationship with the other powers, and that perhaps Bismarck did not leave himself enough loose ends to play with the policies in the way he saw fit. Conclusively, it was probably an advantage for Bismarck that he left office in 1890, as it left Kaiser William II with the resulting problems to resolve and he was able to leave behind the tangle of long-term problems he had created. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    He lost his position as Commissar for War. * Zinoviev and Kamenev did agree with Trotsky about economic matters. He wanted an end to NEP, and end to the food supplies being controlled by the peasants and moves to collectivisation. * Zinoviev and Kamenev thought rapid industrialisation could be achieved if the production of food was more efficient.

  2. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    absence of a general war, there was still plenty of fighting as wars broke out in Spain, Italy and Greece during this period, involving the intervention of France Austria and Russia, and ultimately Britain and Turkey.32 Moreover, many of the terms of the Vienna Settlement were short lived.

  1. Assess the effectiveness of Napoleon III's foreign policy. How did his foreign policy affect ...

    Furthermore, he burdened the economy of France with the cost of an expensive and unproductive war. To conclude, his foreign policy in Mexico Campaign was undoubtedly ineffective in achieving his aims. His foreign policy in Austro-Prussian War also proved ineffective.

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    The army consisted, therefore, of a mixture of old and young, experience and inexperience, combined under one command. * Military historians have disputed the size of Napoleon's Grand Armee at length. For the years before 1805 estimates vary from about 300,000 upwards.

  1. Assess the success of Bismarck's foreign policy with reference to: a) Keeping France isolated ...

    Bismarck used his excellent diplomatic skills in order to avoid such a decision; he initiated a gentleman's agreement between the leaders of the other two countries - the Dreikaiserbund. This would kill two birds with one stone; Bismarck could help maintain friendly relations between Russia and Austria - Hungary and

  2. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    1926 he was granted right to issue decrees with full force of law, no need for support, king or opposition parties 1928 made it that King couldn't appoint P, and had to choose from a list of candidates draw up by the fascist grand council, all who would have been

  1. "In the period 1871-1890 Bismarck was better at crushing his opponents than at producing ...

    In this instance Bismarck was very successful in crushing his main threat and opposition. He was patient in his plea to crush the Liberals and succeeded leaving the party split and virtually powerless. Although it is fair to say that he was also very successful in introducing constructive policies, which incidentally the Liberals agreed with.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    It was a different type of German army which this law created. The Minister of Defense, Theodor Blank, was an anti-Nazi trade-union official, a former carpenter, who during the war had been a lieutenant in an armored unit and had been captured by the Russians.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work