• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bismarcks appointment of Minister President of Prussia (1862) was the most important turning point in the course of German nationalism in the period 1815-1919?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Bismarck's appointment of Minister President of Prussia (1862) was the most important turning point in the course of German nationalism in the period 1815-1919? By 1919 Germany had been united, and the nature of nationalism had changed from a freedom seeking, democratic force into one which demanded popular subservience to the state. German nationalism had clearly changed radically over the period of more than one hundred years and defining the turning point at which it changed is difficult due to the sheer number of factors that impacted upon it as well as the vast number of events and organisations which interfered with its development. Otto von Bismarck would become viewed in later years as the father of German nationalism. When he came to power 1862 the Kaiser was looking for a man who could oppose the liberals and force through a favourable army bill. However, within just nine years Germany would have become united, not without the help, though not always willing, from Bismarck. Bismarck effected the unification of Germany almost single-handedly. However, many of the opportunities which Bismarck actually attempted to manipulate were neither created by him nor very successful. ...read more.

Middle

It also struck a double blow in this respect. It not only made a Prussian-led Germany more likely but it made an Austrian-led Germany less likely. Because of her exclusion from the customs union the Austrian economy suffered and her already fragile market became on step closer to failing and this would be one of the major reasons for her defeat to Prussia. The use of the economy mirrored the nature of German nationalism; initially it was a liberal move, the reduction of trade barriers embodied by the introduction of the Zollverein. However, by the time unification was achieved economic policy turned its back on liberalism and the economic protectionism Bismarck employed against Russia helped show how far nationalism had changed. The Zollverein would form the template upon which the German Empire would eventually be founded, a kleindeutsch dominated by Prussia. Some historians even go so far to view the whole of the unification of Germany as purely an economic transaction, that it was not driven by political ideology but by the cold logic of money and economic expansionism. The Zollverein did represent an important twist in the history of German nationalism but it did not utterly change the face of the ideology but simply made the prospect more likely. ...read more.

Conclusion

It would be easy to say that it was a simple political humiliation for the French to have their enemies declare their new country in the French capital but to do this would ignore the deeper significance of both the time and place it was made. Nationalism within Germany underwent many changes over the period from 1815 to 1919. It suffered from a gradual change from its ideals over the time and it is difficult to differentiate between the impacts that the different potential turning points had on German nationalism. However, the most seminal moment in the history Germany nationalism was when it shifted indelibly from the idealists' views to the pragmatic views of the industrialists within the country. 1866 can be seen as the turning point in the unification of Germany rather than a turning point in the nature of German nationalism. The failure of democracy in 1848 at a time when many other revolutions had succeeded left many Germans with the view that it would only be through violence and warfare "blood and iron" that their dreams would ever be realised. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    During the second half of the century, Austria was thrown out of Italy, the German Confederation was dissolved and the French boundaries altered. In this way, one of the most significant successes of the Vienna Settlement, the absence of a general European war, can hardly be attributed to the arrangements

  2. How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862-71?Bismarck's significance in securing ...

    It later included most German states but essentially, it excluded Austria, being excluded from this free trading zone meant huge economic difficulties for Austria. Prussia had achieved a position of economic leadership within the Confederation, and the Zollverein became a focal point for national feeling, mainly with the nationalist view

  1. What were the obstacles to German Unification immediatly before the 1848 Revolutions

    Finally, Liberalism varied from state to state some states such as W�rttemberg and Baden gave their peoples constitutions and even a limited parliament but Austria and Prussia refused to even consider a constitution let alone a parliament. Germany could be divided by the lines of the river Maine, West-East, and Elbe, North-South, these were rough dividing lines between each region.

  2. Why was Prussia able to win the war with Austria in 1866?

    mobilisation over Hesse-Kassel. Since 1855, she had fallen behind in economics and military status. Austria was not as gifted as Prussia in regard to coal and iron, she did have reserves particularly in the north but not the volume that resided in Prussian territory.

  1. Assess the success of Bismarck's foreign policy with reference to: a) Keeping France isolated ...

    The treaty stated that if a fourth country attacked one of the countries involved in the treaty, the others would adopt a state of benevolent neutrality. This settled the problems for the moment but did not remove the causes of rivalry between Russia and Austria Hungary.

  2. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    John Merriman explains Realpolitik to be the 'pursuit of a nation's self-interest based on a realistic assessment of the costs and consequences of an action'.8 Inherent within this idea is an absence of moral or ethical considerations, and this is precisely what Bismarck used to ruthlessly exploit and engineer his rival's weaknesses to Prussian advantage.

  1. Albert Speers Role as German Armaments Minister during the War

    Speer received his first major commission, as a Party member; in 1932 when Karl Hanke, a close friend, recommended him to Goebbels to renovate and redecorate the new district Headquarters in Berlin. Although the building was inspected by Hitler himself who approved of the finished result, Goebbels however didn?t, and

  2. How far can the impact of the depression be seen as a key turning ...

    In this manner, Bismarck aimed to gain a higher international authority by joining forces with the other World Powers- a far more peaceful method that contrasts drastically with that of his successors. Kaiser Wilhelm ousted Bismarck in 1890 and developed his own aggressive foreign-policy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work