Sonal Varsani 11E                                     GCSE History: Bletchley Park Coursework

What can you learn from source A about the work of Bletchley Park?

Source A is a primary source and has a description of the work involved in Hut 3 at Bletchley Park. The source was written by one of the ‘intelligence staff’. It tells us that workers were ‘very departmentalised’ which meant the workers were deliberately kept in ignorance in order to prevent secrets getting out. B.P had some sort of hierarchy, ‘The real high ups’; only the important people knew what was going on. Hut 3 members were linguistics; they decoded foreign messages. They were intelligent, as they knew how to decode the foreign messages, hence the name ‘intelligence staff’.    

However this primary source may not give an accurate insight as it’s evidence is questionable. The source only shows there is a sense of secrecy in Hut 3 and also suggests that there was no communication to and from Hut 3 and other Huts. In order for us to agree with this theory, we require information from the some of the other Huts at B.P., especially Hut 6.

Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B about the work of Bletchley Park?

Source C is primary source and contains a description of work involved in Hut 6, written by one of the code breakers. It tells us that the code breakers decoded the enigma codes but were not actually informed of the results of the important messages they had translated. This shows Hut 6 members were kept in isolation to prevent information leakage and only the imperative members of B.P. knew exactly what was happening.

This sense of privacy in source B supports source A as Hut 6 members were kept in isolation just like the Hut 3 members because they did not know what was happening outside their involvement. Source B also supports source C, because source B shows the workers did not know what would happen next at B.P. thus adding the theme of secrecy. All three sources share a joint message that procedures at B.P. were top secret. And all the sources have the same amount of information and carry similar reliabilities.

Though the sources share many similarities they also contain many differences. Source B tells us that the worker was female but in the other two sources it does not mention if the worker was either male or female. If the two anonymous workers were female it might correspond only the women in B.P. were kept in ignorance. Although the content for each of the sources link in a general theme of secrecy, they give slightly different information to each other. Source A demonstrates the workers were ‘departmentalised,’ source B shows the workers did not know what was going to happen next and source C explains the workers did not often know the results of their translated codes.

Join now!

Also source B is the only source to tell us when it was produced whereas the others have no dates. This in effect reduces the reliability of all the sources put together.

In conclusion source C does support sources A and B. We are given further support to demonstrate the theory that many members of staff were not informed about events that were happening during and after their work at B.P. The sources tell us many people did not know what was going to happen, what was happening and results of their work at B.P. That shows B. P. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay