• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Both sides were merely pursuing their legitimate interests. This was the crux-and the tragedy-of the Arab-Israeli dispute. Discuss with reference to the period 1948-2000.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The issue of the Arab-Israeli conflict is highly complicated and it is true to assert that the core of the problem comes from both sides pursuing their own conflicting interests, often with little room for compromise. However, I would define 'legitimate interests' as something valid and reasonable, such as economic well-being, civil rights, peace and territorial integrity, apart from factors like religious fanaticism and greed. Furthermore, a major determinant of the Arab-Israeli dispute is the way in which both sides pursued their own interests, in which aggression often supersedes negotiation, especially after the involvement of many radical terrorist groups. In pursuing their often legitimate though diametrically opposed interests, the conflict gets worsened especially when either side employs radical means to achieve their ends. The roots of the conflict stem from the creation of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, in which Palestinian land is forcefully taken to accommodate the Jews. The proclamation of the State of Israel in 1948 led to the first Arab-Israeli War as the Arabs denied Israel's right to exist. The Jews wanted to settle in their homeland dating back to biblical times to ensure their rights and safety. This was in the light of Jewish persecution especially during the Holocaust, whereby an unprecedented attempt to exterminate an entire race of people occurred. ...read more.

Middle

It can again be viewed as legitimate if we consider the Arabs desire to eradicate Israel as reasonable in the first instance, and this is complicated by Israeli seizure of Arab territory after the 1967 war. Both sides being committed to enhance warfare capabilities saw them drawing closer into the Cold War orbit by seeking a superpower patron. The Soviet military aid received by the Egyptians and Syrians granted them to the opportunity to besiege Israel which eventually led to a legitimate Israeli reprisal. Both sides acting in their own varying legitimate interests made the search for permanent peace a gargantuan task in the Arab-Israeli dispute. The search for peace was complicated by several factors, involving hard-line personalities, mutual distrust, forceful reprisals, non-state actors which included radical militant groups, disagreements over extent of compromise and the disunity of the Arabs. Herein lies the paradox between how there can be no peace without security and how there can be no security without peace. Though it can be pointed out that the religious fervour exhibited by certain Islamic terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah and their declaration of Holy War against Israel might not actually be considered legitimate, since it is not entirely driven by practical considerations but religious fanaticism. ...read more.

Conclusion

The situation worsened in 1995 when non-state actors such as Islamic militants and Hezbollah antagonised Israel resulting in the operation 'Grapes of Wrath' directed at Hezbollah in Lebanon. Furthermore, when Netanyahu obtained power after the Peres debacle, there was another step back from peace as the hard-line politician hardened Israeli attitudes towards Palestine, resulting in Arab alarm. These illustrates the dynamics between Arab-Israeli relations even though the basic premise, that of both sides pursuing their own legitimate interests (perhaps excluding Islamic radicalism) remain mostly unchanged. In conclusion, it is true to a large extent that both sides were merely pursuing their own legitimate interests, and this forms the crux of the entire conflict. However, the way in which they proceed to do so, with the resoluteness of their stand and readiness to adopt violence to achieve their objectives, the conflict between them is made far more intractable. Certain conditions such as Cold War geopolitics also arguably worsened the situation. The improbability of both sides in reaching a full compromise due to different beliefs, pride and sustenance issues is why this entire situation is aptly termed a tragedy. "Both sides were merely pursuing their legitimate interests. This was the crux-and the tragedy-of the Arab-Israeli dispute." Discuss with reference to the period 1948-2000. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. WHAT WERE THE CAUSES OF THE YOM KIPPUR WAR OF 1973?

    However, the limitations of this source are that the communist author writes a lot about socialism and the influence of the Soviet Union in the region. Which I feel for my investigation was not that helpful due to the sheer irrelevancy of the information.

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    Why did the Soviet forces lose the war? Like the USA in Vietnam, the USSR underestimated its opponents * Despite initial successes in taking control of cities, Soviet forces were unable to counter the guerrilla tactics of the Mujaheddin and lost control of the mountainous countryside. * Many of the Soviet troops sent to Afghanistan were conscripts, unprepared for the fighting that they were exposed to.

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    (9 marks) From the list of factors given, I consider that the Russian foreign policy was the most important in causing the wars in 1956, 1967 and 1973 between the Arab's and Israelis. During the Arab-Israeli conflict, the world's two greatest 'super-powers', USA and the USSR were in a cold war against each other.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The Department of Defense Statement read: "At approximately 0622 on Sunday, 23 October 1983, the Battalion Landing Team headquarters building in the Marine Amphibious Unit compound at Beirut International Airport was destroyed by a terrorist bomb. The catastrophic attack took the lives of 241 Marines, sailors and soldiers and wounded more than 100 others.

  1. The Arab Israeli Conflict -

    Women's bellies were cut open and babies were butchered in the hands of their helpless mothers. Around 250 people were murdered in cold blood. Of them 25 pregnant women were bayoneted in the abdomen while still alive. 52 children were maimed under the eyes of their own mothers, and they were slain and their heads cut off."

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict.

    This put the Jews in a much physically powerful position than the Arabs. During this Arab revolt, attitudes of the British government began to change towards the Zionist project. A white paper stated that Britain did not support a separate Jewish State and neither a partitioned Palestine.

  1. Despite the Camp David agreement the conflict between the Arabs and the Israelis has ...

    The pressure from other countries is linked to the use of economic sanctions because countries often use money as a form of persuasion and this was very much the case in the Arab Israeli conflict. This is another reason why the dispute is carrying on today.

  2. 'War seldom resolves the causes of conflict' Analyze this claim with reference to a ...

    being driven to war due to the lack of International Law and desire for security. World War one additionally failed to resolve the causes of conflict because the League of Nations was unsuccessful in its attempts to divert any future conflicts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work