• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain and the First World War 1914-1918

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Britain and the First World War 1914-1918 Monday, 15 October 2001 1.) Source A was published before 1916 because the source does not specifically say that you MUST join the army and become part of the 100, 000 required men. The source is only encouraging you to join, and I know that this happened at the start of the war. The fact that it doesn't say you MUST join tells me that conscription hasn't been introduced yet, and I know that conscription was introduced in 25th January 1916. Source B was published before 1916 because this source is only encouraging men to enlist in the army. The caption,' Daddy, what did YOU do in the Great War?' stirs patriotic feelings in men, but the source doesn't not say that men must join the army. This tells me conscription hasn't been introduced yet, and I know that conscription was introduced later in the war, during 1916. Source C was published after 1917 because the poster is encouraging people to enlist in the US Army and help defeat the 'Mad Brute.' I know that the USA only joined the war in April 1917 so they are starting to get men to join up, so that means that this poster was printed after 1916 when the USA had just joined the war and needed men to enlist. ...read more.

Middle

Also he would have been sniped, by standing up like that. One of the privates also has a moustache, but this is inaccurate because privates weren't allowed to have facial hair in the army. They are also wearing the wrong hats (dress uniform) when they should be wearing helmets. Source G is propaganda because it gives the impression that if you buy the cigarettes, you will be helping the war effort. 6.) Sources H, J and I may differ because they were different accounts by different people. Source H is by Sir Douglas Haig. He would've been biased because he was leading the war and so wanted to make it seem that they would win. Also, he was away from the front lines, so he wouldn't have known what was really going on, and how the men were really feeling. He also may have been given information that was wrong. In the source it says that 'the wire has never been so well cut.' It may have well cut in some places but in most places it wasn't. Source I is from an experienced solider, George Coppard. He would've been up on the front lines and have seen the battle first-hand. Also, his account is a part from the story, 'With a Machine Gun to Cambrai.' It was written after the war as a story so he might have exaggerated some details. ...read more.

Conclusion

They thought it'd be an easy war and be over in a few months. Source G agrees because the man is standing up. Normally, soldiers didn't do this because you'd get shot at. The source is trying to make soldiers in the war look proud and heroic. The source is also propaganda because it's trying to sell cigarettes. It gives the impression that if you buy the cigarettes, you'll be helping Britain out in the war. Source J agrees because it is propaganda. The photo was taken with the intention of letting people know that British soldiers captured Germans. The DORA Act of 1914, allowed the Government to control what the public were shown and this is exactly what they would show the public. Source K disagrees because it provides a fair view on what trench conditions were like. Often, it was boring with nothing to do, as shown by Source K where they sit around and sing poems to each other. In conclusion, I'd agree up to a certain extent. On the one hand, the military and civil authorities did mislead people. Most of them thought it was going to be an easy war and be over quickly. None of them knew it'd last for 4 years and kill millions of people. However, the military and civil authorities did try and provide a suitable view on trench life. They made the Battle of Somme film to show the public what life was like, and that was realistic. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Agreement was not reached until 1973. When the US forces withdrew. * The defence of South Vietnam was then taken over by the ARVN, the Army of the Republic of Vietnam. It held out until May 1975. * When South Vietnam fell it was united with the North.

  2. Assessing the impact of the first world war on international relations in the decade ...

    minimized.6 Although there was this advantage, some states created by the Peace Settlements made little economic sense. For example; the new countries of Austria and Hungary, which were small ad weak and unable to support themselves. They had most of their population, resources and markets.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    that if one side broke the rules, the other side could do so as well. As a result, between July 1993 and April 1996, both sides have accepted civilian casualties whenever their side had attacked civilians first. In April 1996, the agreement that had ended the July 1993 fighting broke down under the weight of cumulative violations by both sides.

  2. 'Propaganda Was an Essential Weapon In the War Against Germany’ - To ...

    To prevent this the government s parties joined together to support the munitions crisis. Lloyd George was made the Minister of munitions. The skilled workforces were asked to remain in the industries that needed them and not the industry which paid them the most.

  1. Britain and the First World War

    In his last sentence Clark shows his belief in how the Generals should have met the challenge of a new war, 'they could defeat their enemies by forcing them to use up all their reserves'. This statement could be correct as neither of the forces had unlimited reserves, and if

  2. To What extent was the German Government responsible for the outbreak of the First ...

    They were keen to involve Italy in the Alliance to ensure they would not have to fight on two fronts. These protective alliances however, became increasingly offensive, for example Germany delivering the Blank cheque. This suggests that the alliances can be held culpable because they were used as an excuse

  1. How did the War change life in Britain?

    Some of the fittest and most able men were not volunteering at all. In the end, many welcomed the government's taking control of the situation and introducing conscription. Not everyone welcomed conscription, however Fifty MPs, including leading Liberals, voted against it in Parliament.

  2. How essential was the role of propaganda in the First World War?

    * Speeches were another medium that the government used as method of propaganda. The reason being that the public listening would emotionally be moved by the speaker (who would probably have been given a sum of money by the government to exaggerate and lie about the war effort in a bid to encourage the support)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work