• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Buddha is smiling"[1] is what D.P Dhar, Indira Gandhi's principal advisor and close friend, told Indira Gandhi over an executive secured phone line connection to the South Block right after the nuclear explosion.

Extracts from this document...


"Buddha is smiling"1 is what D.P Dhar, Indira Gandhi's principal advisor and close friend, told Indira Gandhi over an executive secured phone line connection to the South Block right after the nuclear explosion. May 24th, 1974, was an auspicious date to many. As the multitudes in India began contemplating on the issue of regional power, millions of Buddhists around the world celebrated Buddha's birth. As the news made headline after headline, citizens of Earth pondered on why a country like India would want weapons of mass destruction and what they would do with them, raising confused and angry reactions and many questions. And to what extent would this affect peace in the Indian subcontinent in the pre-1990 years? And yet, it was in the stinging, cold irony of D.P Dahr's three, rather powerful, words that the world found an answer: the Buddha did not smile; the Buddha frowned. The Indian nuclear program began with Jawaharlal Nehru indicating his views on the prospect of India acquiring nuclear weapons on June 26th, 1946: "As long as the world is constituted as it is, every country will have to devise and use the latest scientific devices for its protection... ...read more.


But although the Brasstacks incident ended peacefully this time, the past reminded them that in the future, occurrences like this might not end as smoothly without bilateral dialogue. Nuclear optimists use the deterrence theory to support their optimism. In fact, most of the arguments that nuclear optimists put forth are dependent on the validity of the deterrence theory. The deterrence theory, in essence, states that political leaders will not risk using their nuclear weapons if there is even the slightest likelihood of a retaliatory strike. Thus, nuclear optimists argue that stability can be achieved through this 'standstill' on the use of nuclear weapons. The deterrence theory puts the basis of its argument on the prospect of MAD, or Mutually Assured Destruction, a frightful reality that, unfortunately, strives not on the ideal of turning the other cheek, but on the ideal of the threat of striking the other cheek. However, the dangers of reckless rhetoric far outweighed the promises of stability that the Bomb brought turning the deterrence theory, in application to the subcontinent, into a mere dream. Due to the lack of proper communication between the military heads in both countries, rhetorical damage wounded understanding and was usually taken as a threat. ...read more.


Nuclear weapons, no matter how powerful or how secure, will always have a delicate spot, an Achilles heel: a weakness, which lies in their sole purpose and reason for existence. All it would take is the simple pressing of a button, a command, and the sub-continent will plunge into the darkness of a nuclear winter5. Yet, sometimes, it seems as if we are already experiencing that winter for our cold hearts and cold minds cannot foresee the dangers that a nuclearized sub-continent may bring. So then... Pigs can fly. The Moon is cheese. And the Buddha smiled. For the reality of the nuclear dimension in South Asia is much too delicate to work around or to ignore. We do not have the humanity in us to witness the Buddha weeping. So: to what extent did the 1974 Indian nuclear tests affect peace in the subcontinent? To the extent that humanity in the Subcontinent may never live a day without living in fear. To the extent that every thing a politician in India or Pakistan says is at risk of being misinterpreted. To the extent that the generations that live here in and will live here in the Subcontinent will face the reality of nuclear weapons. For the Buddha did not smile. The Buddha frowned. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    United States Marines stationed near Beirut International Airport were surrounded by predominantly Shia militia groups. The day after the Lebanese Army was forced out of West Beirut and as the security environment in Lebanon deteriorated, Britain, France, Italy, and the United States decided to withdraw their MNF contingents.

  2. British Imperialism in India.

    (Lal, 132) WORLD WAR II On September 3, 1939 Britain declared war on Germany again in the start of World War II. As the last time the British said that India also went to war. The Indian populations was angry for not being consulted about going to war so the protests started again.

  1. The world would be a better place without nuclear energy. What do we use ...

    they have more bombs than the rest of the world put together. No one will be alive after a nuclear war so what's the point in worrying whether a country can't defend ourselves. Even if people do survive I hardly think that they will be proud of the fact that they have reduced another country to a useless wasteland.

  2. International Relations Assess the arguments for and against the proliferation of nuclear weapons

    As a choice we have repeatedly chosen to use more conventional weaponry than NWs. "War can be fought in the face of deterrent threats, but...the closer a country moves toward winning...the more surely that country invites retaliation and risks it's own destruction...If states can score only small gains, because large

  1. Question 1 minus intro n conslus

    Efficiency was becoming a bit part of everyday life. Advertising boomed in the 1920's, mostly taking a shine to electrical goods for the home such as vacuum cleaners (as electricity was becoming exceedingly popular as a new energy source as old sources of energy was hardly used compared to 10 years previously.

  2. Do nuclear weapons have any use as instruments of deterrence or are they just ...

    dangerous situation- with in 1955 the world facing a stand off between N.A.T.O (North Atlantic Treaty Operation) and members of the Warsaw pact (Soviet union) (Scott.2001,p.81).However, instead of these organizations resorting to war the threat of a nuclear conflict forced compliance between the two super powers through treaties such as

  1. What were the overall aims and consequences of Indira Gandhi's foreign policy towards the ...

    India and the US had economic ties and therefore some cooperation between the two was essential. There are many factors that effected the relations between India and the US and the foreign policies of the two nations. A closer look at the major policies, such as non-alignment, containment, and non-proliferation

  2. Atomic diplomacy revised - U.S. nuclear security policy.

    Kennen was never naive enough to view the bomb as an offensive weapon. In his long memorandum "The International Control of Atomic Energy," Kennen noted, "there could be no way in which weapons of mass destruction could be made to serve rational ends beyond simply deterring the outbreak of hostilities" (Kennen 39).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work