• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Buddha is smiling"[1] is what D.P Dhar, Indira Gandhi's principal advisor and close friend, told Indira Gandhi over an executive secured phone line connection to the South Block right after the nuclear explosion.

Extracts from this document...


"Buddha is smiling"1 is what D.P Dhar, Indira Gandhi's principal advisor and close friend, told Indira Gandhi over an executive secured phone line connection to the South Block right after the nuclear explosion. May 24th, 1974, was an auspicious date to many. As the multitudes in India began contemplating on the issue of regional power, millions of Buddhists around the world celebrated Buddha's birth. As the news made headline after headline, citizens of Earth pondered on why a country like India would want weapons of mass destruction and what they would do with them, raising confused and angry reactions and many questions. And to what extent would this affect peace in the Indian subcontinent in the pre-1990 years? And yet, it was in the stinging, cold irony of D.P Dahr's three, rather powerful, words that the world found an answer: the Buddha did not smile; the Buddha frowned. The Indian nuclear program began with Jawaharlal Nehru indicating his views on the prospect of India acquiring nuclear weapons on June 26th, 1946: "As long as the world is constituted as it is, every country will have to devise and use the latest scientific devices for its protection... ...read more.


But although the Brasstacks incident ended peacefully this time, the past reminded them that in the future, occurrences like this might not end as smoothly without bilateral dialogue. Nuclear optimists use the deterrence theory to support their optimism. In fact, most of the arguments that nuclear optimists put forth are dependent on the validity of the deterrence theory. The deterrence theory, in essence, states that political leaders will not risk using their nuclear weapons if there is even the slightest likelihood of a retaliatory strike. Thus, nuclear optimists argue that stability can be achieved through this 'standstill' on the use of nuclear weapons. The deterrence theory puts the basis of its argument on the prospect of MAD, or Mutually Assured Destruction, a frightful reality that, unfortunately, strives not on the ideal of turning the other cheek, but on the ideal of the threat of striking the other cheek. However, the dangers of reckless rhetoric far outweighed the promises of stability that the Bomb brought turning the deterrence theory, in application to the subcontinent, into a mere dream. Due to the lack of proper communication between the military heads in both countries, rhetorical damage wounded understanding and was usually taken as a threat. ...read more.


Nuclear weapons, no matter how powerful or how secure, will always have a delicate spot, an Achilles heel: a weakness, which lies in their sole purpose and reason for existence. All it would take is the simple pressing of a button, a command, and the sub-continent will plunge into the darkness of a nuclear winter5. Yet, sometimes, it seems as if we are already experiencing that winter for our cold hearts and cold minds cannot foresee the dangers that a nuclearized sub-continent may bring. So then... Pigs can fly. The Moon is cheese. And the Buddha smiled. For the reality of the nuclear dimension in South Asia is much too delicate to work around or to ignore. We do not have the humanity in us to witness the Buddha weeping. So: to what extent did the 1974 Indian nuclear tests affect peace in the subcontinent? To the extent that humanity in the Subcontinent may never live a day without living in fear. To the extent that every thing a politician in India or Pakistan says is at risk of being misinterpreted. To the extent that the generations that live here in and will live here in the Subcontinent will face the reality of nuclear weapons. For the Buddha did not smile. The Buddha frowned. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. International Relations Assess the arguments for and against the proliferation of nuclear weapons

    Why fight if you can't win much and might lose everything?"9 'NWs used for deterrence do more for national security than does the acquisition of territory...A state using NWs as a deterrent strategy does not need territory as much as a state relying on conventional defense.

  2. The world would be a better place without nuclear energy. What do we use ...

    If there was a nuclear war then everyone, except America, would surely lose. All of this is true but having a few bombs is just as good as having none. Any sane person knows that if there were a nuclear war then America would come out on top purely because

  1. Question 1 minus intro n conslus

    Ford's production of Model Ts made his company the largest automobile manufacturer in the world. Cars were not the only industry rising dramatically. The amount of telephones produced in the same time increased by 13 million to 20 million and there was an amazing rise in radio sales, starting from 60,000 up to 10 million.

  2. Do nuclear weapons have any use as instruments of deterrence or are they just ...

    been called an occupation by foreign powers, suggesting that we have changed the meaning of war in order to avoid nuclear war (for instance the Soviet Union was aiding Vietnamese rebels as opposed to attacking American troops). One view is that Nuclear weapons actually brought stability into an otherwise very

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    To pursue that course of action, Damascus called upon an associate of Frangiyeh, Lucien Dahdah, then the Chairman of the Board of the Intra Company. Dahdah, who had family ties with Frangiyeh and old acquaintances in Syria, was contacted in Paris, where he was staying.

  2. What were the overall aims and consequences of Indira Gandhi's foreign policy towards the ...

    of India and of the US will be taken, therefore allowing me to judge the extent to which each of the policies had an effect on Indo-US relations. The state of the world and of China, Pakistan, and the Soviet Union in particular were of tremendous importance and were determining

  1. Dtente, meaning and definition.

    Multiple levels of the d�tente: The term d�tente was used to signify the apparent relaxation in the otherwise tense relations between the two superpowers-the USA and the USSR. But it will be too parochial to associate d�tente with the gradual improving of relationship between these two powers.

  2. Do the recent events in Russia and America suggest that world peace and a ...

    On the political term of failure (of communism), Mikhail Gorbachev was pointed at the cause of failure. Glasnost enabled people to have free speech. Gorbachev allowed criticism throughout communist countries. Glasnost opened up Russian politics for the first time in 70 years; this allowed political opposition to form in Russia and other communist controlled countries.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work