• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

By 1890 Bismarck Had Achieved A Unified But Not UnitedGermany - How Far Do You Agree With This Statement

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"By 1890 Bismarck Had Achieved A Unified But Not United Germany." - How Far Do You Agree With This Statement? In January 1871, as the Franco-Prussian war neared its end, King William I of Prussia was announced as the Emperor of the Second Empire (or Reich), with Otto Von Bismarck as his Chancellor, in the Palace of Versailles. From this point Bismarck had led a once weak nation into achieving his acclaimed 'master plan': to become the most dominant power in Europe, this was then confirmed ten days later with the defeat of the French army; to united all German speaking nations, excluding Austria, where Prussia was the dominant power; and to obtain political and military victories over Austria. However, although this was undeniably achieved, were the peoples and leaders of the Second Reich united in aim and feeling? The theory of unification was all very well, but each of the 25 states (now excluding Austria and Prussia annexations from the German Confederation) had its own traditions and ethos, so to unite the people in fact, as the nations had been, proved more complex than anticipated. Although the aim of the liberals of 1849 had been achieved, they were displeased by the manner in which unification had been imposed from above, rather than through popular national movement. The German Empire also ensured Prussian dominance in the Reich, with both the Emperor and Chancellor being Prussian as well as Prussia having the large majority in both the Reichstag and the Budesrat, with 17 out of the 58 votes. ...read more.

Middle

Having said this the demise of the National Liberals in the process of the tariff introductions allowed Bismarck to once more stress national interests to the population and strengthen the idea of a German identity throughout the Reich. For Bismarck's part, he viewed the Catholics as the major cause of disunity in his Protestant, Prussianized government he had so carefully set up, and so saw them as a threat to the peace, and believed they were plotting Prussia's downfall. Catholic dominated countries surrounded the borders of the Empire and even the south German states still associated with the Austrians, a Catholic country, rather than the Prussians. This fact alone is yet another sign of already instituted disloyalty within the Union, meaning that it would take a lot to unite such a diversity of people in national objective and attitude. This led Bismarck to believe that to attack the Catholics would weaken, and hopefully destroy, one of the main causes of hostility in the Empire. Nevertheless, the states involved in the North German Confederation had been largely Protestant, leaving the Catholics as a minority culture. The policy he launched became known as the 'Kulturkampf', translated as 'struggle for culture', and represented the struggle for power between the protestant Bismarck and the Roman Catholic Church. Yet this threat was only bought to light by the success of the Catholic Centre Party in the 1871. ...read more.

Conclusion

As Bismarck himself said: "Whoever has a pension fro his old age, he is much more content and easier to handle than the person who has no prospects." Furthermore, Bismarck also built on the economic prosperity of Prussia. He kept the standards of living in Prussia exceptionally high, and the economic prosperity and standard of living contented the potentially explosive elements of middle-class Germany. In this way Bismarck removed the threat of the revolution predicted by Karl Marx. In conclusion to this, although the people of the German Empire were not all united in aim as Bismarck had hoped, this was always an unlikely dream as even in modern society there are different political parties representing the different views the nation holds. It could even be said that his obsessive views of nationalism leading to the persecution of what he saw as minority groups set a basis for the extreme views and beliefs seen in Germany prior to the Second World War. Having said this, Bismarck did more in terms of state welfare for the nation than any other country had even began to anticipate, although perhaps not for the right reasons, this fact cannot be overruled. Therefore, despite not achieving unity within the united states making up the German Empire, or achieving his objective in the discrimination of such groups as the Socialists, Bismarck lay down the founding feelings of nationalism for future generations as well as leading the way in welfare reform for other countries to follow. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862-71?Bismarck's significance in securing ...

    Coupled with Prussia's economic strength, its military proved to be of major use in such instances as the Austro-Prussian war of 1866 and Franco-Prussian war of 1870. After serious defects had been revealed in Prussia's defences in 1859, King William appointed von Roon as Minister of war to make some major reforms in the army.

  2. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    and how did they do it so quickly? One reason for this was the fact that France was isolated diplomatically in the 1860's, mainly due to Napoleon III's foreign policy which alienated France from many European powers for example supporting Polish rebels alienated the French from Prussia and Russia because

  1. How far had Hitler achieved his Third Reich?

    This led Hitler to agree to a Concordat, but the Nazis did not keep their promises as they discredited the Churches. By 1939, religious schools had nearly disappeared and numerous monasteries were closed down. Aggressive decisions against the Churches led to public outcries, so the government had to draw back frequently to avoid initiating widespread resistance.

  2. Why was Prussia able to win the war with Austria in 1866?

    She did not have the resources to afford such a complex new industry and economy let alone a brand new army. The main reason for Prussia's economic growth was coal and iron and without these how could Austria compete? The Habsburgs were still very conservative in nature and so were

  1. "Kaiser Wilhelm II used to the full his authority as Kaiser of the German ...

    This decision brought him one step closer achieving personal rule, by removing a very opinionated Chancellor, so that Wilhelm could replace him with someone more puppet-like. When Caprivi took over, he dropped the anti-socialist laws, as was the Kaiser's wish.

  2. How Effectively Did Irish Catholic and Nationalist Leaders Advance Their Cause 1801-1921 ?

    The harsh actions of the Black and Tans meant that the British government was heavily criticised both in the UK and Ireland. Sinn Fein were also helped by the Black and Tans and the Anglo- Irish war as both sides realised that neither of them could win, especially as the

  1. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    Indeed, such was the seriousness of the state of her economy that state bonds fell from 81.5 to 29 in just three months.17 The economic superiority that Prussia enjoyed enabled it to dominate the German customs union - the Zollverein.

  2. To what extent did the increase in the persecution of witches in Europe from ...

    Although feminists such as Anne Barstow argue that misogyny was the driving force of the witch-hunts, many of the arguments are very one sided and do not explore any of the other factors that contributed to the increase in persecutions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work