• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

By what means, and how successfully did Henry VII improve Royal Finances?

Extracts from this document...


By what means, and how successfully did Henry VII improve Royal Finances? Henry VII was a political realist, he knew he needed a good financial base from which to run the country, but on a more personal note, he also saw the need to create a strong financial situation upon which to secure his reign and dynasty. As Caroline Rodgers states 'Henry was acutely aware of the importance of strong finances if he was to remain safely on the throne.' However, it has often been said of Henry, 'No man has ascended to the throne with such a lack of financial experience and resources as Henry VII.' S. B. Chrimes. How this inexperienced monarch was to stabilise the English economy and finances was a mixture of competent financial management, a prudent nature and some good luck. In this assignment, I will investigate the methods used by Henry VII to improve royal finances during his reign. The main earner for Henry was in the Royal Estates. As we know, Henry did not give many titles or lands to his supporters or relatives, as a result much more property was kept in the Kings personal estate, with the revenue gained from these holdings going towards the royal finances. He also, through Acts of Attainder, gained more land into his own assets, thus increasing earning for the running of the kingdom. Through escheats, instead of the lands of the deceased being passed to other nobles, the King absorbed them for himself, again increasing land and revenue for the royal finances. ...read more.


Bonds and recognisances boosted this income significantly, fines for illegal retaining also contributed to this sector of income. Any monies gathered from the Law Courts were also added into the treasury and used to increase the royal finances. In the course of Henry's reign, the economy flourished, and it was during this time that Henry's royal finances benefited by the import (tonnage) and export (poundage) taxes placed on goods in England. This could yield impressive amounts of revenue during times of economic growth. A more obscure source of income was that of the so-called, 'French Pension'. This was part of the Treaty of Etaples in 1492, in it, Henry was promised �5,000 per annum to remove their armies from French soil. This was obviously a useful extra sum at the King's disposal. All the sources of income we have read about so far is derived from ordinary or prerogative revenues, meaning that it was the King's right to collect it, and he was obliged to use this sort of income to maintain the Kingdom, to pay for the running of government and to keep his household. However, there were alternate forms of collecting income, these were extraordinary revenues, and were used to fund particular needs of the Kingdom, such as to fight wars, that the King would be unable to afford from his own resources. It was through these extraordinary revenues that Henry could gain more money for the royal finances. ...read more.


By 1509 the annual revenue amounted to �100,000 compared to �65,000 in the last years of Edward IV. This proves how much Henry actually did improve royal finances, and how he brought them up to date. In fact the situation was so good he could even afford to loan major noble families like the Habsburgs huge sums of money, and still carry on running the country as per usual. We can see examples of how successful his methods were in the legacy he left behind. His court was always lavishly kept with no expense spared, he also left one years unspent income aside for his son Henry, his heir, (who was to become Henry VIII) in order so that he would have a firm financial footing when he ascended to the throne. He has been described in his own era as, 'The richest lord that is now known in the entire world.' Showing how his wealth compared to other monarchs at the time. Although the figures quoted in this assignment may not seem like much, by today's standards, however in the early 16th century they were extremely healthy. These were the methods that Henry Tudor, an unknown, untrained, minor noble with no financial management training when he came to power in 1485, had managed in the time he was on the throne until 1509, to improve royal finances to a degree even he would not have thought possible. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Henry VII a successful monarch?

    3 star(s)

    The use of bonds also had a positive effect on the economy and finance. The money fined from the un-loyal nobles went in to the royal accounts - and money from revenues of feudal lords and royal estates were also collected.

  2. Securing the Tudor Dynasty: The Reign of Henry VII.

    Therefore foreign support cannot be the main reason why Henry was successful in securing his throne, there is no doubt that foreign support contributes to the way in which Henry was able to stifle the activities of claimants such as Warbeck, Simnel and John de la Pole.

  1. Henry VII and His Money.

    In The Prince, Machiavelli argues that for a ruler the only 'good' is to strengthen his throne and his kingdom. Conventional notions of what is morally good or bad, honest or dishonest, he says are irrelevant to the ruler. By Machiavelli's standards, then, Henry VII would be considered an almost

  2. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    Dr Mike Ibeji, 'BBC History -Monarchs and Leaders, 'The Character and Legacy of Henry II', Pages 1-2 http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/state/monarchs_leaders/henry11_ibeji01.shtml (Visited 17/12/2002) 16. Early Royal Courts - Clanchy M.T, 'Magna Carta and the Common Pleas' in Studies in Medieval History presented to R.H.C Davis (H. Mayr-Harting and R.I. Moore ed..1985) pp.219-232 17.

  1. How effective was Henry VII as a monarch?

    English merchants, to achieve an effective security system through preventing war, and to be recognised as the rightful King of England. The first major treaty that Henry signed was the Medina del Campo with Spain in 1489, which has been described by Rogers and Turvey as "the most significant achievement

  2. To what extent was Henry VII a successful monarch?

    Needless to say, Henry VII was very unpopular with the nobility. However, this could also be counted as one of his greatest successes that although many monarchs were overpowered by the nobility, Henry generally had more power than monarch before him.

  1. Was Henry VII a successful monarch?

    However, most of these were held captive, such as the Earl of Warwick and the de la Pole brothers, and so Henry?s enemies manifested themselves as imposters attempting to usurp his throne. First, there was a boy named Lambert Simnel, whose marked resemblance to the Earl of Warwick made him a valuable pawn of the Yorkists.

  2. How successful was Henry VII in securing international recognition in the years 1485 to ...

    recognition as not only was Arthur the next heir to the throne. This meant that the Treaty of Medina Del Campo had to be renegotiated ? Catherine of Aragon would instead marry Henry?s younger son who was now inline to be the next heir to the throne (later became Henry VIII).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work