• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

By what means and what success did Henry VII establish the primacy over the Over Mighty Nobles?

Extracts from this document...


By what means and what success did Henry VII establish the primacy over the Over Mighty Nobles? The nobility were near the top of the hierarchy of the feudal system; they were of high social class and owned large amount of land or held office. The king relied heavily on his nobility to run the country and provide law and order, because local government and local policing were not employed or run by the king. They all had originally been granted land and titles in return for service in the established feudal tradition. The nobility also retained men meaning that they could call up men who voluntarily contracted and obliged to fight, so since there was no British army at the time the king did rely on the nobility to provide solider when needed. As you can see the nobility had main stream control of their community, so it is no surprise that these nobles could become over mighty as seen in Richard III reign for example Henry Stafford of Buckingham plotted to over throw Richard III. ...read more.


Another way for Henry to gain control of disloyal and over mighty nobles were making them sign a written document binding them to give money if they broke the condition of the bond. Henry made the leading men of the country sign these, this meant they were at his mercy if they broke the contract which could lead to crippling fines. For example Marquis of Dorset was believed to have a connection with the Simnel conspiracy and was made to sign a bond totalling to �10,000 as a pledge of good behaviour. Some other ways of getting elegance from the nobility was to gain recognisance which was a formal debt or some sort of obligation; it could be enforced by means of heavy penalties. Livery and Maintenance were neither new practise and they have been in use for generations; kings before Henry had also tried to control both practises. Livery was the badger from a gentleman's or nobleman's coat of arm which was sign that they were in service. ...read more.


In my opinion I believe that Henry did succeed in controlling the nobility not by limiting the number of peerage he handed out but how he enforced law against them to stop rebellions. Henry did recognise that the nobility was a important factor in running the country however he did place limits that were not so severe that it would cause an uproar but enough to stop the over mighty nobles from causing an uprising. Henry calculated mercy was especially a key factor in keeping the nobility feeling that Henry was not anti noble but also Henry was able to gain a lot of loyalty from it as well. Murphy concluded that 'Early Tudor England was a society that believed in good rule from above and in providing this for his subject Henry VII nobility played a key role'. Following on from this I would also agree that the relationship between nobility and King was a better than those in the War of the Roses and Henry had successfully maintained control of the nobility. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    However, once more Alexander is shown to have not thought through the reforms properly, as the increasingly free press and ability of them to criticise government naturally led to an increase in tsarist criticism. This meant that the Tsar had to react, and rather than adapt his policies, imposed even tighter controls over the media.

  2. By what means, and how successfully did Henry VII improve Royal Finances?

    This shows that the income on crown lands increased greatly during Henry's reign, and proves that he was indeed a shrewd man who benefited a great deal from the situation. As Tony Imperato points out, 'Medieval feudalism placed the monarch in the position of owner of all the lands in

  1. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    Beyond the Myth: The Story of Joan of Arc. New York: J.B. Lippincott, 1990. This book proved to be an excellent source on the study of Joan of Arc as it provided detailed information in addition to valuable insights into the human relationships and emotions involved with the main figures of the time.

  2. How was Henry VII anti noble.

    Henry VII could not afford to contemplate their trust, or the possibility of the nobles over powering him would always play a key role during his reign. The new policies made by Henry could be portrayed that he was an anti-noble king, first of all, Henry introduced the following ideas;

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work