• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can the handling of Foreign policy by the British Governments of 1931-6 be defended?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Can the handling of Foreign policy by the British Governments of 1931-6 be defended? The problem of Japan By the 1920s Japan was a major imperial power. It had secured Formosa from China in 1895; Korea from Russia in 1905 and after 1914 had taken all German colonies in China and the Pacific north of the equator. It also had substantial interests in Manchuria, a large province, which it had leased from China. The Japanese people, disappointed with their gains from the First World War favoured expansion. The political turmoil in China and its policies toward Japan provided incitement to Japan to intervene in Manchuria. ...read more.

Middle

China was expecting Article 16 to be invoked but the League of Nations failed to do so. There can be many reasons attributed to this, the first of which is the fact that Japanese and Chinese soldiers were repeatedly involved in frays. This meant there was no concrete evidence that Japan had resorted to war. Whether this simply acted as an excuse for the League not to get involved or they didn't want to act without certain knowledge is irrelevant, as it doesn't take away the fact that they had a reason not to act. By February 1932 Japan had control of all Manchuria and had set up the puppet state Manchuko. ...read more.

Conclusion

Britain also had enough problems of its own; its navy was too weak to enforce sanctions and the troops they had in the area were undefended and USA refused to enforce League action. Britain's main aim was to try and make China and Japan come to an agreement. In conclusion Britain had no choice but to act in the way it did, they were fully justified in not using military force to settle the conflict, and if the finger should be pointed at any country for not taking action against Japan it should be at the USA. They time and time again failed to come through for Britain because of economically motivated reasons and they were the integral part of Britain securing an agreement for China and Japan. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The most significant feature of the February 1984 was that for the first time Shi'i organizations, with Amal in the lead and the Iranian-backed Islamists of Hizballah ("Party of God") not far behind, imposed themselves on Lebanese politics. West Beirut came under local militia control, principally Nabih Berri's Amal and Junblatt's PSP, with the Sunnis and Palestinians subordinatede.

  2. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    As he did not agree with the stipulations of the treaty, which he believed which would create a Russian puppet in the form of Big Bulgaria, San Stefano did not last, he made offensive moves towards the area in a show of strength.

  1. To what extent can Britain's policy towards Germanybefore Munichbe defended?

    his period as Chancellor of the Exchequer, Chamberlain had been closely involved in the evolution of Britain's defence and foreign policies. In fact when Chamberlain comes to power in 1937 appeasement had been a British policy since 1919, Chamberlain simply maintains Britain's tradition policy.

  2. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    Perestroika also suffered a similar fate seeing as not much was being actually done to restructure the system. From 1987 to 1988, Gorbachev introduced five new economic reform which were designed to help the fledging Soviet economy. In January 1987, he introduced quality control inspectors in order to make sure

  1. Chinese (Prc) Foreign Policy - the Character of PRC’S Foreign Policy

    -Zhou Enlai and Kissinger conducted the initial diplomacy. The US table-tennis team was invited to tour China, spawning the term 'ping-pong diplomacy'. -These talks paved the way for Nixon's visit to China in February of 1972, which was a hugely important symbol. Also indicated that the Cultural Revolution was coming to an end, and that China was prepared

  2. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    Soon, however, it became apparent that this was too narrow a term because it di not include international broadcastin and the policy information (press attach´┐Ż) functions. By the late sixties, the broader term public diplomacy was accepted by more and more professionals."10 [italics added] And probably as a form of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work