• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can the handling of Foreign policy by the British Governments of 1931-6 be defended?

Extracts from this document...


Can the handling of Foreign policy by the British Governments of 1931-6 be defended? The problem of Japan By the 1920s Japan was a major imperial power. It had secured Formosa from China in 1895; Korea from Russia in 1905 and after 1914 had taken all German colonies in China and the Pacific north of the equator. It also had substantial interests in Manchuria, a large province, which it had leased from China. The Japanese people, disappointed with their gains from the First World War favoured expansion. The political turmoil in China and its policies toward Japan provided incitement to Japan to intervene in Manchuria. ...read more.


China was expecting Article 16 to be invoked but the League of Nations failed to do so. There can be many reasons attributed to this, the first of which is the fact that Japanese and Chinese soldiers were repeatedly involved in frays. This meant there was no concrete evidence that Japan had resorted to war. Whether this simply acted as an excuse for the League not to get involved or they didn't want to act without certain knowledge is irrelevant, as it doesn't take away the fact that they had a reason not to act. By February 1932 Japan had control of all Manchuria and had set up the puppet state Manchuko. ...read more.


Britain also had enough problems of its own; its navy was too weak to enforce sanctions and the troops they had in the area were undefended and USA refused to enforce League action. Britain's main aim was to try and make China and Japan come to an agreement. In conclusion Britain had no choice but to act in the way it did, they were fully justified in not using military force to settle the conflict, and if the finger should be pointed at any country for not taking action against Japan it should be at the USA. They time and time again failed to come through for Britain because of economically motivated reasons and they were the integral part of Britain securing an agreement for China and Japan. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    and most importantly earned results, which he believed to be most favourable for Britain, importantly this was the last conflict until the First World War mainly due to this treaty which benefited all, as Russia was compensated with Bessarabia, while Turkey lost little and regained Macedonia.

  2. Discussing Japan.

    However, not all farms are now high tech. They still have traditional family run farms but even they are starting to catch on to the new high tech wave. Specially developed machinery like mini tractors and harvesters can be used to care for the crops when they have fully grown.

  1. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    Though Gorbachev actively spoke of change in public, behind the scenes very little was truly being done to change the system. The explosion of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor was a perfect example of this lack of change. Though the government spoke of opennes, it took Gorbachev nearly three weeks to

  2. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    According to his article: After the Second World War, when it became acceptable, in peacetime, for one government to try to influence the people of another country and to do this from an embassy, the nature of diplomacy had fundamentally changed.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    It addressed grievances though without undermining the confessional foundations of a political system. One such grievance was Lebanon's Arabism. The document proclaimed Lebanon's Arabism but stated that Lebanon is a sovereign, free and independent country. Of the seventeen points stated in the Constitutional Document, five dealt with Muslim grievances.

  2. Chinese (Prc) Foreign Policy - the Character of PRC’S Foreign Policy

    Biao arguing that the priority should be the internal enemy, whilst Mao's counter argument was that a US victory in Korea would allow it to gain a foothold in a part of Asia which was very close to China. -When the UN entered Korea in 1950, Zhou Enlai called it an imperialist invasion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work