• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Characteristic Study: Who was more influential in the success of the Reds in the Civil War? Lenin or Trotsky?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Characteristic Study: Who was more influential in the success of the Reds in the Civil War? Lenin or Trotsky? Lenin's strength's Trotsky's strengths Lenin was seen as an inspirational figure whom all Bolsheviks looked up to as a role model. He had a lot of support from many people. His inspired use of speeches and pamphlets boosted the position of the Bolsheviks in the Petrograd Soviet and his program of arming the Red Guards and organisation of the M.R.C, the Military Revolutionary Committee, were vital in sustaining and defending the Bolshevik movement. Lenin provided the army with both food and armaments that were crucial in the Reds' victory. Trotsky commanded the Red Army that defended Bolshevik Russia against the Whites and foreigners Lenin's return from exile brought hope and new belief to the Reds. ...read more.

Middle

Trotsky raised uncertain Red Army morale by appearing in his famous armoured train at critical points Lenin's use of propaganda was brilliant. He knew exactly what the people wanted and was able to exploit this. He had previously done this with his 'peace, land, bread' slogan. He won the hearts of the people during the Civ. War. In August 1918 at Sviiashsk near Kazan he rallied dispirited Red troops and helped turn the tide against the SR's. Lenin crucially was able to win the support of some Cossacks, who fought for the Reds. This provided them with extra soldiers. The Red army was originally an undisciplined volunteer force. However, Trotsky turned it into a well disciplined, regular army that was able to win the civil war. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lenin, in contrast, was different from Trotsky. It is probably their difference in qualities that made them compliment each other. Lenin was arguably the better leader of the Bolsheviks. He knew what the people wanted and could exploit this fact to win the hearts of people and gain support for the Reds. Like I have written in the table (above), Trotsky was a magnificent leader, but was occasionally erratic in his decision-making. It was Lenin that acted as a steady influence to stop Trotsky making any uncharacteristic mistakes. Lenin was a figurehead for the Red army. His return from exile first lifted the Bolsheviks and inspired them to revolt and seize power from the Provisional government. As long as he was there, it seemed as if the Reds' soldiers had something or someone to fight for. These two men both played pivotal roles in the Reds' defeat of the Whites in 1918. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    This was particularly true of the Fourth Coalition. Although the frontiers of 1807 are not those of the Empire at its greatest extent, that year does mark an important turning point in Napoleon's affairs. Napoleon's three mainland enemies brought to heel, and with the expectation that Britain would soon succumb to the Continental Blockade, he was at the peak of his success.

  2. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    the way to take over as French premier by attacking his predecessor's failures in World War I) in case war engulfed the USSR (a prospect taken seriously by the Communists in 1927). However, advocating a change of government was dangerous in the Soviet Union.

  1. Vietnam war

    In return the Vietnamese limited their assistance to the CPK and refused to supply them with arms. In March 1970 while Sihanouk was abroad, a US-backed coup led by General Lon Nol took over government, who used terrible repression that lead to the radicalisation of many Cambodians.

  2. Goebbels was more influential than Himmler. Discuss

    Goebbels's relationship with Hitler emerged due to the fact that Goebbels abandoned the socialists hence Hitler rewarded him with the position of the Gauleiter of Berlin. This impressed Goebbels and he begun to focus on the common beliefs that the two shared such as anti Semitism.

  1. Why did the Reds win the Civil War?

    His beliefs were simple. If a Red commander was successful in combat, they were promoted. If a commander failed and survived, he was executed. Here is a quote that demonstrates his ruthless attitude: "Every soldier who voluntarily deserts will be shot."

  2. Why did the reds win the civil war

    His task of defeating the Whites was made a great deal more difficult by the Czechs, if he had kept his word and let them move freely out of Russia, this problem would not have occurred. The success of the Czech Legion may have lead to the fate of the royal family.

  1. Did the reds win the civil war, or did the whites loose it?

    The level of corruption in the white armies was extraordinary. Denikin a white leader stated, 'I cannot do anything with my army. I am glad when it carries out my combat orders'.

  2. The enormous role that Trotsky played in the success of the Bolsheviks up until ...

    However the workers, like most of Russia, were in a desperate state. They were disillusioned by government of any description and were therefore unlikely to accept the planned dictatorship of one man; Lenin and one party; the Bolsheviks. They were starving and destitute as a direct result of the war

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work