• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Chinese Foreign Policy & National Security - Engaging China: Seoul-Beijing Détente and Korean Security

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chinese Foreign Policy & National Security Engaging China: Seoul-Beijing D�tente and Korean Security Victor Cha, 1999 Summary by Michael RASKA Ph.D. Candidate, Yonsei GSIS The China-South Korea axis is perhaps the most overlooked variable in the strategic environment of Northeast Asia. For nearly five decades their relationship was characterized by war, lack of dialogue and non-recognition; then, over a period of some three years, this situation gave away to fully normalized and amiable relations in 1992. Rapprochement between Seoul and Beijing in 1992 opened one of the first frontiers of the post-Cold War thaw in the region, and future security will hinge at least partly on this core relationship. In this context, Cha analyzes the evolution of Sino-South Korean reconciliation, and argues that the South Korea's engagement policy from the late 1980s in the political, economic, and cultural arenas played a major part in eliciting unprecedented cooperation from Beijing, however, its initiatives alone were not a sufficient condition to prompt this cooperation. A prior and necessary condition was a change in the strategic context surrounding China and the Korean Peninsula that raised both the benefits of cooperation and the costs of non-cooperation; the end of Cold War . ...read more.

Middle

which implied mutual economic prosperity as a means of expanding diplomatic ties with former adversaries as well as assuming a leading role for South Korea in international organizations and the continued expansion of program multi-directional diplomacy (i.e. using meetings of multilateral bodies such as APEC, ASEAN, non-governmental track-two diplomacy, high-level military exchanges). The second method of engagement has been sports diplomacy - participating in athletic competitions hosted by each country provided a useful means by to express good will and interest in expanding the economic cooperation (Seoul 1988 Olympics, Beijing Asian Games 1990). What was the benchmark of success of South Korea's engagement strategy? The key was not only engaging China, but also the terms of policy toward North Korea. The following measure could be used: (A) Failure - Chinese support of North Korea (B) Minimal Success - '1.5' Korea policy; formal support of North Korea and de-facto recognition of South Korea (C) Moderate Success - equidistance between North and South Korea (D) Very Successful - discourage North Korean provocation and aggression (E) Most Successful - China supports only South Korea Cha argues that the outcome of South Korea's engagement falls in the middle range (B to D). ...read more.

Conclusion

Both states are aware of this factor, and share similar interests. However, Beijing seems to be in a dilemma, it desperately does not want to face a collapse of North Korea nor does it want to see a nuclear North Korea. Hence, China's actions in the foreign policy arena are still bound to the minimum necessary level to ensure stability. Ironically, while the Chinese officials have been claiming that they are making efforts to persuade North Korea to enter multilateral dialogue and negotiation, they also claim that North Korea doesn't listen as it used to. In this regard, my question is: How much leverage does China have over North Korea? :) 1 From the ROK perspective, during the Cold War China was part of the communist bloc, a patron of revolutionary regimes in Asia, and thus one of the primary threats to South Korea's survival. China's intervention in the Korean War in 1950, in conjunction with the July 1961 Friendship Treaty between China and North Korea with its automatic intervention clause cemented South Korea's perceptions of China as a threat. At the same time, China's hostility toward South Korea was equally intense. South Korea was the 'fascist' axis of the 'iron triangle' that included 'U.S. imperialism', and 'Japanese militarism.' ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did North Korea invade South Korea in June 1950, and why did USA ...

    After the Chinese Civil War the USA did not recognise the People's Republic of China (PRC) because they were communist. Therefore the USA used its veto power to prevent the PRC from taking their designated seat in the UN Security Council. After North Korea invaded South Korea, Truman was furious.

  2. To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil ...

    "he had combined twenty Falangists, eight Carlists, five generals and seventeen from other parties" according to Lee. Therefore, as Lee argues, Franco "was able to bind them together while, at the same time, preventing any of them from becoming too dominant and introducing embarrassingly radical policies.

  1. Korean propaganda during the Second World War and the Korean War had a different ...

    Near the end of the war, propaganda started to take different forms. The Asian population, especially Korea and China, started to distrust Japanese broadcasting, and propaganda. Building upon the bitterness towards Japan, Japanese broadcasting was looked upon as a hoax, disdainful, distrustful, and manipulative.

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    On 23rd June 1948, all surface links between Berlin and the West were cut. The Berlin Blockade had begun. How did the Allies react? The Western Allies were not prepared to surrender West Berlin, and were ready to supply the people of West Berlin whatever the cost.

  1. A Study of Air Supremacy in the Korean War.

    Airlift was the only reliable source to sustain the Marines and Army personnel who were engaged with the enemy. The C-119 "Flying Boxcars" were given the risky task of providing airdrops. The supply chain of food, ammunition and equipment kept X Corps and the Eighth Army on the move.

  2. The Sino-Soviet Split

    In a meeting with Soviet ambassador Mikoyan shortly after the CCP triumph, Mao communicated his intention to ignore all treaties made between the GMD and other countries. He also requested control of Port Arthur, Outer Mongolia, industries in Dalian, and the Soviet funded Changchun Railway, in an attempt to empty China of all foreign presence.

  1. North Korea and South Korea after the Korean war.

    the potential outcomes of further confrontation the North and the South agreed to cease fire and created the "Demilitarized Zone" also known as the DMZ. Ironically, with over a half a million Korean deaths, the established DMZ is close the original 38th parallel agreement.

  2. American economic foreign policy and the origins of the cold war

    In fact, the one nation capable of taking on economic leadership - the United States - was not willing to do so, largely due to Congressional opposition to the cancellation of allied war debts and the reduction of trade barriers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work