• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Chinese Foreign Policy & National Security - Engaging China: Seoul-Beijing Détente and Korean Security

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chinese Foreign Policy & National Security Engaging China: Seoul-Beijing D�tente and Korean Security Victor Cha, 1999 Summary by Michael RASKA Ph.D. Candidate, Yonsei GSIS The China-South Korea axis is perhaps the most overlooked variable in the strategic environment of Northeast Asia. For nearly five decades their relationship was characterized by war, lack of dialogue and non-recognition; then, over a period of some three years, this situation gave away to fully normalized and amiable relations in 1992. Rapprochement between Seoul and Beijing in 1992 opened one of the first frontiers of the post-Cold War thaw in the region, and future security will hinge at least partly on this core relationship. In this context, Cha analyzes the evolution of Sino-South Korean reconciliation, and argues that the South Korea's engagement policy from the late 1980s in the political, economic, and cultural arenas played a major part in eliciting unprecedented cooperation from Beijing, however, its initiatives alone were not a sufficient condition to prompt this cooperation. A prior and necessary condition was a change in the strategic context surrounding China and the Korean Peninsula that raised both the benefits of cooperation and the costs of non-cooperation; the end of Cold War . ...read more.

Middle

which implied mutual economic prosperity as a means of expanding diplomatic ties with former adversaries as well as assuming a leading role for South Korea in international organizations and the continued expansion of program multi-directional diplomacy (i.e. using meetings of multilateral bodies such as APEC, ASEAN, non-governmental track-two diplomacy, high-level military exchanges). The second method of engagement has been sports diplomacy - participating in athletic competitions hosted by each country provided a useful means by to express good will and interest in expanding the economic cooperation (Seoul 1988 Olympics, Beijing Asian Games 1990). What was the benchmark of success of South Korea's engagement strategy? The key was not only engaging China, but also the terms of policy toward North Korea. The following measure could be used: (A) Failure - Chinese support of North Korea (B) Minimal Success - '1.5' Korea policy; formal support of North Korea and de-facto recognition of South Korea (C) Moderate Success - equidistance between North and South Korea (D) Very Successful - discourage North Korean provocation and aggression (E) Most Successful - China supports only South Korea Cha argues that the outcome of South Korea's engagement falls in the middle range (B to D). ...read more.

Conclusion

Both states are aware of this factor, and share similar interests. However, Beijing seems to be in a dilemma, it desperately does not want to face a collapse of North Korea nor does it want to see a nuclear North Korea. Hence, China's actions in the foreign policy arena are still bound to the minimum necessary level to ensure stability. Ironically, while the Chinese officials have been claiming that they are making efforts to persuade North Korea to enter multilateral dialogue and negotiation, they also claim that North Korea doesn't listen as it used to. In this regard, my question is: How much leverage does China have over North Korea? :) 1 From the ROK perspective, during the Cold War China was part of the communist bloc, a patron of revolutionary regimes in Asia, and thus one of the primary threats to South Korea's survival. China's intervention in the Korean War in 1950, in conjunction with the July 1961 Friendship Treaty between China and North Korea with its automatic intervention clause cemented South Korea's perceptions of China as a threat. At the same time, China's hostility toward South Korea was equally intense. South Korea was the 'fascist' axis of the 'iron triangle' that included 'U.S. imperialism', and 'Japanese militarism.' ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    The airlift was their way of calling his bluff. Stalin had no choice but to call off the blockade, since the only other way to get the Allies out of Berlin would have been by force. That would have led to a 3rd world war.

  2. To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil ...

    army with the Catholic Religion; in other words he associated the Spanish Civil War, with a Holy War. In addition, Franco organized the Nationalists military structure, which led to their superiority over the Republican military structure. While the Republicans had loyal generals and inexperienced non-commission officers, the Nationalists had a

  1. Why did North Korea invade South Korea in June 1950, and why did USA ...

    All the messages to America from events in Europe said they had to act decisively and immediately to prevent the spread of communism. However, China had been lost to communism already, so no action is practical there. US were itching to see where it would appear next.

  2. North Korea and South Korea after the Korean war.

    Since then neither side has officially declared peace, they are both still formally at war. 4 From here North and South Korea continued on two different paths of foreign relations. Both nations relied on foreign allies for military security. Although the North had agreements with China and the Soviet Union, and they did not support further military conflict.

  1. Mao was essentially more successful in his domestic policies for China, then he was ...

    And each brigade contained around 200 households. The whole system was controlled from the PRC's central government and prices, distribution and farming methods were given from above. In the five year plan, Mao did not have to many concerns of the people that is why he also abandoned independent harvesting.

  2. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    In fact, the fabric of Soviet society had been gradually unraveling for years. By the time Mikhail Gorbachev assumed leadership of the Soviet Union he was aware of that things coulds not continue in the same manner. In 1985, Gorbachev tried to introduce the reforms of 'acceleration' and 'intensification' in relation to upgrading productivity.

  1. The Sino-Soviet Split

    He was particularly eager to erase every vestige of the Nationalist rule, which he associated with meekness, and, now that his victory was complete, set about the task of rectifying some of the issues that had been the focus of domestic indignation.

  2. American economic foreign policy and the origins of the cold war

    failure to regulate private loans to Europe encouraged highly speculative and irresponsible investment. Moreover, the Federal Reserve's tightening of the money supply during the early 1930s precipitated the financial crisis in Europe, while several notorious tariffs of 1930 triggered a wave of worldwide protectionism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work