• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Communist Purification in Czechoslovakia.

Extracts from this document...


Andrej Zsoldos Mr. Osterlund 20th Century History 2003/04/30 Communist Purification in Czechoslovakia In August 1968, the Soviet Union under the leadership of Leonid Brezhnev has invaded Czechoslovakia to restore communism, to minimize western influence and to counterbalance any measures of democratization. As early as in the late 40's, under the leadership of Stalin, the Czechoslovakian officials were informed and warned not to accept the aid from the Marshall Plan proposed by the United States. The real reason that provoked Brezhnev and ignited his power to use his Soviet might, was the Prague Spring. This short era was gradually launched by Alexander Dubcek, the Secretary General of the Slovak Communist Party and the leader of Czechoslovakia from January 1968 till the invasion. The Soviet Union was technically forbidden to allow any state within their sphere of influence to turn or become democratic. After the invasion, Czechoslovakia's foreign and internal affairs were closely bonded with the Soviets', and so the Czechoslovak population felt isolated and even erased from the rest of Europe. However, towards the mid 1970's communism in Eastern Europe gradually began to lose its strength mainly thanks to the Helsinki Conference, which tackled European Cooperation and Security, in 1975. ...read more.


These leaders were mainly concerned about their communist party being overthrown and weakened if by any chance the democratization efforts and movements would reach their countries. The only Eastern European country's ruler that agreed and supported Dubcek's actions was Tito in Yugoslavia. (Schlesinger 84-85) However, Leonid Brezhnev was the most upset and uneasy regarding Czechoslovakia's movement towards democracy and liberality. At the climax of the Prague Spring, in March, Brezhnev announced in a speech that he would no longer accept and abide by Dubcek's disgraceful measures. Nonetheless, Dubcek did not get threatened. The Soviet leader could not tolerate Dubceks's policies and so in late July he insisted on a personal meeting with him on the Soviet-Czechoslovak border. Brezhnev tried to intimidate and oppress Alexander Dubcek to immediately mitigate the reforms and obliterate any efforts of democratization. However, the Soviet speculative mind had not settled for negotiations, and so Brezhnev, in his usual and expected manner, took the violent route. Besides his negativistic attitude towards this struggle, he also received pressures and requests from fellow communist leaders; such were Ulbricht and Gomulka, to crush and contain the Czechoslovak reform movements. ...read more.


This treaty was signed by 35 countries in July 1975 in Helsinki, Finland. (Schlesinger 93) The dilemma was simple and Brezhnev's hypocrisy and double standard became visible and obvious. The treaty included human rights and freedom of speech/press clauses that Brezhnev ignored and so later on he had to face severe consequences to his detriment. Monitoring from Helsinki was commenced in Moscow, and later in Ukraine, Lithuania, Georgia, and Armenia. This was Brezhnev's unintended side effect hegemonistic and territorial greed. (Schlesinger 93) Leonid Brezhnev invaded Czechoslovakia with the aim to restore communism and counter any efforts of democratization and reform conducted by Alexander Dubcek, the head of Czechoslovakia since January 1968 and the coordinator of the Prague Spring. Brezhnev put all is power, military and political, to purge the communist parties around the world by assigning them obligations according to the Marxist Leninist authoritarian system. Brezhnev has succeeded to overthrow the government and restore the communist regime in Czechoslovakia, however failed to convince the bulk of a country, and that is the populace. And in the end the western public realized that no longer was communism the appealing and ideal system for developing countries. Leonid Brezhnev's territorial and influential ravenousness showed the world that his hypocrisy and two-faced character was inappropriate to lead one of the two superpowers in the bipolar world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Legacy of Communist Leaders.

    1917-1918 The Brest- Litovsk Treaty. The result of it is that Russia disjoined from east territories and Germany demands to allow self-determination to Ukraine, Byelorussia and Baltic states. Under Lenin anything that was about individualism, being an individual simply did not exist. On the other hand Vladimir Lenin thought a lot about education and thought that everyone must study.

  2. What were the causes of the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a socialist ...

    could basically report as it pleased.25 With political debate now officially sanctioned, and the government being openly criticised and often unable to effectively defend itself, its legitimacy and role was increasingly called into question. It is clear that in this particular area Gorbachev had miscalculated.

  1. American History.

    This stimulated the economy in the 1840s/1850s. 27. Results of the Second Great Awakening *The Second Great Awakening* - The wave of reform that swept America in the early nineteenth century was both a reaction to the radical changes American society experienced following the War of 1812 [immigration, market economy, expansion] and to the Second Great Awakening (1790s - 1840s).

  2. Why were the Prague Spring reforms unacceptable to the Soviet leadership?

    without any qualms. "The education [Dubcek] had received in the advanced party school and his experience in the Party apparatus inculcated blind discipline, as well as limiting his horizons and defining his terms of reference."5 Thus, the reforms that were enacted by the Dubcek administration could not be identified

  1. The government in China today is communist.

    The Communists could also refuse to give democratic rights because of their experience with warlords. From 1916-27 China was split and ruled in different areas by warlords and Civil War erupted. China's people experienced a very bad period in that time and suffered a lot.

  2. The Era of Good Feelings

    After the war it became apparent that the nation would once more need a strong centralized bank to help pay off the ensuing war debts. Therefore, in 1816, the bank was revived in its new form as the Second Bank of the United States.

  1. Do the Writings of Clausewitz have contemporary relevance?

    as Egypt and Syria would willingly fight on the same side as Israel. This supports Clausewitz's ideas of attacking the armies (or at least cities) of allies to win the war.32 For the coalition however attacking and destroying the Iraqi army (primarily the Republican Guard)

  2. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    domestic politics to understand the process of democratization, it is not sufficient to explain everything. Moreover, we can say that this is not a situation unique to Armenia and Azerbaijan but can be applied in most cases to newly independent states, or states undergoing democratization.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work