• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way.' How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way.' How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964? When the February Revolution brought down the Tsarist regime and lead to the ascension of the Provisional Government, it was hoped that this would bring about significant change from the autocratic regime of the Tsars. However, the totalitarian Government of the communists would seize power in the October Revolution and go on to maintain many aspects of Tsarist rule including repression, structure of government and ideology of autocracy, which ultimately meant that communists and tsars ruled Russia in the same way. In terms of ideology, both communists and Tsars believed that they had been divinely appointed to Govern. Whereas Marxist theory dictated that the proletariat would rise, and the regime would rule on their behalf in a 'dictatorship of the proletariat', Tsarist ideology maintained that they had been divinely appointed by God. There is considerable continuity throughout the period as these divinely appointed rulers both shared ideological belief in total control and centralisation of power. The removal of the Provisional Government in the October Revolution proved to be a significant turning point as the communist regime would ultimately rule Russia in the same way as the Tsars had previously done. ...read more.

Middle

There is also considerable continuity in how other rulers from both communist and tsarist Governments were similar in their attitudes towards repression as Alexander III and Stalin in particular saw it as a vital tool of Government. Stalin, believing ''death is the solution to all problems'', sought to remove opponents and implement his version of communism, he removed his opponents in the Politburo one by one in much the same way as Alexander III had sought to reverse the reforms of his father by driving opponents underground. One can also point out that communists and tsars ruled Russia in the same way through the continual use of propaganda. Whereas this was mostly done through the arts and churches under Tsarist Rule, there is also evidence of change as the communists heavily intensified propaganda. Rising literacy rates under Lenin meant that the media could increasingly be used in addition to the continual use of the arts, everywhere in Russia there were statues and photographs of Stalin and Lenin was repeatedly photographed in symbolic clothing much like the Tsars before him. The use of the church returned too, Stalin allowed for the return of the churches during the Great Patriotic War in an attempt to boost patriotic spirit. ...read more.

Conclusion

The view that communists and tsars ruled Russia in the same way is somewhat challenged through the fact that some rulers did seem to have intention to reform. Khrushchev had the best of intentions in his social housing and Virgin Lands schemes much as Alexander II had placed importance on the Russian masses in implementing reforms. In contrast, Stalin, Alexander III and Nicholas II prior to 1905 did not place the same degree of emphasis on the people, which indicates that communists and tsars did not rule in the same way. However, despite signs of intent, Khrushchev's heavy Cold War spending and Alexander II's refusal to implement reforms that threatened his power reinforce the view that communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way because both were reluctant reformers, only reforming out of necessity rather than choice. In conclusion, ultimately it becomes clear that communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way in the 1855-1964 period. Despite change being evident through ideological differences and implementation of policy, the same outcome would usually occur. Reforms were met with restrictions and there is considerable continuity throughout in the structure of Government as both communist and tsarist rulers sought to maintain their autocracy. The view that communists and tsars ruled Russia in the same way is an accurate view of the 1855-1964 period. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    Similarities between the Tsars and Stalin can also be drawn between the bad temper and brutal natures of both rulers. This is illustrated by when servants discovered Stalin's wife's death they were reluctant to tell him, these 'Little People' had a reasonable aversion to breaking bad news to the Tsars and Stalin, and they fell "faint with fear"10.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    of men could read and write under Lenin compared to just 51% in 1897, before Stolypin took over. The peasantry would have a far better quality of life, although still mediocre, with the ability to read. This vast improvement in literacy is one of the most neglected changes within the period.

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    And in this it succeeded.' 54 The Congress also created little hard feeling and dispute that the whole of Europe did not all go to war at once for a century, until World War I. Schroeder notes that '1815 is the one and only time in European history when statesmen

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    handle - and there were projects that took much longer than expected to complete. * The successes were achieved at great cost in human suffering - living conditions lagged well behind developments in industry. Millions died, especially in the countryside.

  1. Explain why the opponents of the Tsars from 1855 to 1917 were more successful ...

    had dominated peasant life, however once Nicholas II relaxed these controls opposition had enjoyed more success. By contrast, the communists heavily intensified this and even when relaxations were granted, as under Khrushchev, the regime still had a vast degree of control over the Russian people.

  2. Assess the view that Russias communist leaders did less than the Tsars to improve ...

    Similarly in 1932 when collectivisation under Stalin did not have the desired impact, the Kulak's were accused of hoarding supplies as they had been under Lenin, who chose to send in the requisition squads. In contrast to the lack of interest regarding living conditions, sweeping reforms were introduced under the communists that aimed to improve working conditions for the peasantry.

  1. How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? ...

    was to group 50-100 holdings into one unit.[29] It was believed that larger farms would be more efficient and would encourage the effective use of machinery. Efficient farming would, in theory, have two effects: it would create surplus food supplies that could be sold off as cash crops to raise

  2. Opposition to Russian governments was ineffective in the period from 1855 to 1964. How ...

    These groups are somewhat ineffective at this point though as they, like previous groups, lack popular support and unity. This is highlighted by the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks splitting into two separate parties from the SDP in 1903. However opposition was seemingly effective in 1905 under Nicholas II.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work