• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Compare and contrast the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III Alexander II and his son, Alexander III, although from the same family, had very different views on how the Russian Empire should be run. Alexander II is often referred to as the ?Tsar Liberator? and ?Great Reformer?, unlike his son the ?Great Reactionary?. Although both men were endeavouring to maintain the autocratic rule in a world of industrialisation and democracy, they had very different ideas about how to maintain that control. Examining their policies from education to the peasantry, the differences are clear. During the reign of Alexander II the education reforms began, starting with the policy that all classes of people could attend school. This move meant hundreds of new school opening and better education for the working class and peasantry. Secondary schools began to admit women and the universities were given greater independence, separate from the state. This proved very successful in educating a future generation of workers and provided a good basis for the beginning of Russian industrialisation. ...read more.


When Alexander II came into power, he relaxed the rules around what was and was not allowed to be published. The press were allowed to discuss government policy and could publish more liberal ideas, giving the editors a lot more freedom. This changed drastically when Alexander III succeeded to the throne, reversing almost all of this father?s reforms. Censorship was reinstated very strictly and fourteen newspapers were banned for spreading ?liberal? ideas. Foreign media was censored by the Okhrana, ensuring no liberal ideas such as democracy and power to the people could enter Russia and the minds of her people. This signified the beginning of the ?great repression?. Although both rulers wished to maintain autocracy, Alexander II had a more liberal idea of how to keep control over the people. He established local governments, called the ?Zemstva? consisting of members elected by the local people. This made the public feel as though they had some power over their lives in the community. This again contrasts with Alexander III?s ideas of maintaining an iron grip on the nation. ...read more.


Laws were introduced which reduced the tax burden on peasants and a Peasant Land Bank was established ? allowing the lower class to loan pieces of land to farm, making them more productive. Foreign loans from Britain and France ensured the continuation of Russia?s economic development. Alexander II allowed linguistic diversity across the Empire. The idea of Russification was entirely Alexander III?s. He intended to unite Russia under one language and culture but ended up almost contradicting himself. Organised pogroms ? attacks on Jews ? which had been approved by the government were frequent occurrences during the reign of Alexander III, undermining his idea of a united Empire. The policy that everyone had to speak Russian and that all documents had to be written in Russian was not well thought through. To begin with, it caused many problems for non native speakers and caused resentment from many areas. This all lead to many people leaving Russia and seeking sanctuary in neighbouring countries. Alexander II?s reforms, by contrast, seem much less extreme and more liberal, with the idea that if he could keep the public happier then he would be able to maintain control of the growing population. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How successful was Alexander II in transforming Russian Society

    Other reforms were also not without fault. Zemstvas and Dumas never truly had the demands of the peasants fulfilled and they had no greater power. The Provincial Governors, who were appointed by the Tsar, could overrule any decision and by 1914, still only about 60% of provinces had a local government.

  2. To What Extent Were the Reforms of Alexander II Intended to Preserve and Strengthen ...

    Freed serfs found themselves renting better land from the landowners in order to produce enough crops to pay the landowners back, and this only compounded their poverty. These redemption payments effectively tied serfs to the same piece of land that they had been tied to before they were "free", for

  1. Reforms under the Czars Alexander II and III

    the governor-general of Lithuania, praising the supposed generous, patriotic intentions of the Lithuanian landed proprietors, and suggesting that perhaps the landed proprietors of other provinces might express a similar desire. The hint was taken: in all provinces where serfdom existed, emancipation committees were formed.

  2. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    To secure his power, Alexander III reduced access to education so that enrolment in high schools fell and appointed 'land captains' in rural areas in 1889 with the power to whip and persecute the peasants for minor offences. This earned him bitter resentment from the peasants who felt that they were again being treated like serfs.

  1. Was Alexander II more successful than Alexander III in coping with the problems ...

    eventually result in the formation of the People?s Will, the group responsible for the assassination of Alexander II himself on 1st March 1881. It can thus be seen that Alexander II did not successful cope with the opposition he faced.

  2. To what extent did Alexander II deserve his title of the Tsar Liberator

    However, the Tsar went on to remove political cases from the jurisdiction of the courts, and the police were still able to arrest anyone they so wished. The peasants did feel a new sense of freedom; in this respect, it was a success, however, the flaws in the reform do go some way to negative such success.

  1. To what extent was Alexander III reign reactionary?

    Universities all over Russia were temporary closed in 1889 because of student demonstrations against government control. The Tsar also banned Women attending all higher education above 16 years old. However these policies did not eradicate groups such as the peoples will and they even made an attempt to assassinate Alexander III.

  2. How effectively did Alexander II cope with the problems he faced on his succession?

    Furthermore little profit was made on the railways, demonstrating the failure of Alexanders coping mechanisms to bolster and modernise the economy. Reuterns aims were further cut short, by the Turkish war of 1877. Overall, anyone would have struggled to swiftly turn the failing serf system into a modern economy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work