• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Prasad Gopikrishnan Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29. Italy and Germany had suffered as a result of their participations in the war. Both Italy and Germany had to suffer many consequences as a result of the war which scaled from internal political problems to problems at the international frontier; magnitudes of the consequences may have differed respectively. However, when comparing and contrasting the situation in Italy and Germany a general feel of the situation must be analyzed, thus, in the following extract the political situation, social situation, economy, and general situation of the respective nation will be evaluated. Ultimately, even though both nations had been hit with s backlash from their World War 1 participation, the Germans had the worse situation in every aspect and had recovered from it better and more successfully than their Italian counterparts. The political situation in both nations was arguably similar in terms of their instability and the hatred towards the running government right after the war which later turned into a more favourable type however the percentages varied. Firstly, in the year 1919 The Two faced Giolitti government introduced a proportional system in the parliament after the war hoping to get the majority of the votes even though they were running out of favour in the country. Yet, the introduction of the system didn't seem to have an impact and failed at changing the political instability. Giolitti and his government failed to realize that without a political tradition that no party would gain the absolute majority. Thus the coalitions between the different parties continued. Giolitti was a lucky man to have survived the elections of 1919 in this system. Sooner or later his luck had to run out and so in 1921 Giovanni Giolitti called for the elections under the impression of the growing support of the fascists. Giolitti accepted Mussolini's offer of an electoral pact. ...read more.

Middle

The Germans were in need of more money; money that was beyond their reach, eventually they resulted to printing more money which they hoped would pay for what they wanted and result in not having to pay for the reparations as their currency was now worthless. The German hope for settling everything else within their country was a dream comes true even though the middle class were upset, but, the Germans were not excused from paying the reparations. As a result of these financial problems Gustav Stresemann and Hjalmar Schacht (finance minister) replaced Ebert. Under Stresemann the Germans successfully agreed to Locarno which would secure German boundaries, and then signed the Dawes Plan and the Young's Plan with the USA, whereby the Americans would invest and loan money to Germany so that reparations could be paid; which meant that all money owed to other countries would be paid in turn. The Young's Plan on the other hand was an American plan as well whereby the Germans would be given 2 billion Pounds to pay for the reparations and it would eventually be paid back over a 59 year period. This provided economic prosperity and growth which wasn't seen in Italy at this time, international intervention and a change in leadership had helped the Germans achieve more in this field in comparison to the Italians who were better off to start in comparison to the Germans. It was mentioned that the Italians faced an inflation of about 560%, although it must be remembered that the German inflation surpassed this over the years, in addition to this the German inflation had begun earlier than the Italian inflation in the year 1923, the Stresemann's ability to change the currency to Rentenmarks, and then Gold Marks to revive the German economy was a risk, yet it paid off, the Italians on the other hand seemed to have taken a conservative measure towards their economy or arguably nothing at all. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Economy was getting better, the government was steady and more people were being employed as more jobs were created. The people of Germany also faced further problems despite the mentioned as trading couldn't occur and were limited with the resources they had as they were experienced an embargo, also the cold winters during which time had caused many fatalities and as a result affected many of the homeless who faced the adverse affects of the hyperinflation. Moreover, what the Germans faced that the Italians didn't have to encounter was the Ruhr crises of 1923. The Italians did not have to deal with another nation in a situation whereby the public were being affected as jobs were lost; people were injured in small fights against the French, and not producing goods from the industrial region. In conclusion it can be seen how much more the Germans had to face in relation to that of which the Italians faced to eventually obtain success. In conclusion, in the extract above the nature of events after the war has been outlined, it is noticeable that the Germans had faced events over the time period whereby their situation after the war had been worse as the magnitude of the event they encountered was comparable despite the similarity in nature, thus, the Germans has done better than the Italians. One may ask what that means. Well it simply means that the Germans had to work harder than the Italians to live through inflation higher than 560%, to see a glimmer of the Golden Age of the Weimar, to unlock the impositions of the Treaty of Versailles peacefully through an international treaty otherwise known as Locarno and lastly to have even lived through 5 stable years under Gustav Stresemann with high expectations. Many historians today do support this theory as in-depth analysis shows that if the governing body of post-war Italy had been in charge of Germany, instead of Ebert and particularly Stresemann, the achievements of Germany would not have been seen. The fruit wouldn't have been seen, the apple would not have been eaten. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. What were the causes of the German hyperinflation of 1923 and what were its ...

    drive the value of the mark down and then to pay of the rest of their reparations bill in workless currency. On 9 January 1923, after exclaiming that if necessary he would seize' productive pledges' from Germany, Poincare ordered French and Belgian forces into the Ruhr, justifying his actions by

  2. Hitlers Germany

    he had built six thousand feet up on the Kehlstein, above the Berghof, approached only by a mountain road blasted through the rock and a lift guarded by doors of bronze. There he would elaborate his fabulous schemes for a vast empire embracing the Eurasian Heartland of the geopoliticians; his

  1. Hitler's Willing Executioners - The role of Ordinary Germans during the Holocaust

    conspiracy theory at the time would have positioned the executioners to believe that what they were doing was right as they were "protecting themselves from the Jews." (The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During WWII And The Holocaust pg 166-Jeffry Herf, 2006)

  2. Despite it all too obvious political and economic failings, in terms of its society ...

    Walter Laqueur proclaims that a real representative of the spirit of the Weimar Republic was Thomas Mann. Mann faced what became known as the political dilemma of the Weimar intellectual. He had to choose between his conservative past and the liberal present.

  1. Explain how Mussolini was able both to obtain office and to consolidate his power ...

    So a collaboration of disappointment at the gains made from the peace settlements and the perceived weakness of the governments role in assuring Italian benefit, and the perceived negligence of the government in maintaining the Italian economy to avoid the depression, led to a distinct atmosphere of disillusionment and frustration.

  2. Was the work of Gustav Stresemann the main reason for the Weimar governments ability ...

    Unsurprisingly so, there was a lot of bitter resentment towards the Weimar government and the politicians whom had signed the Versailles treaty, dubbed the ?November criminals? by the vast majority of the German population. The challenges faced by the government grew as time went by.

  1. The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic in the period 1919 ...

    This meant that there was instability with in the government as all of the republics 28 parties found it difficult to agree and collaborate. Between the years 1919 and 1933 there were 20 separate coalition governments. This inconsistency in the Reichstag posed a threat to the stability of the republic as it meant decisions and agreements were difficult to achieve.

  2. How accurate is it to suggest that the Treaty of Versailles was mainly responsible ...

    back the reparations, when their own economy was on the brink of collapse. This all highlights how the Treaty of Versailles caused political and economic instability in Germany between 1919 and 1923; the people were angry with politicians for accepting responsibility for the war, and the harsh reparations payments demanded

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work