• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare & Contrast Cavour & Garibaldi's Contributions to the Unification.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare & Contrast Cavour & Garibaldi's Contributions to the Unification The 1848 revolution in Italy saw The Kingdom of Piedmont become a constitutional monarchy under King Victor Emmanuel. Prime Minister Conte Camillo di Cavour persuaded Napoleon III of France to sign a secret treaty of alliance with Piedmont (at Plombieres), which allowed the French to intervene on the side of the Piedmontese once Cavour had provoked Austria into a war. In truth, the assassination attempt on Napoleon III by a militant Italian Mazzinian, Orsini, was much more of a prompt for his own involvement than the requests by Cavour. The Franco-Austrian War of 1859 involved much bloody fighting in northern Italy, but premature to Austrian defeat, Napoleon III withdrew in fear of losing a great many more lives. Additionally, the war had been a lot more expensive than at first anticipated. This enabled Austria to recoup some its losses, in particular the wealthy province of Venetia (in an armistice on 24th June behind Cavour's back). At this stage, Cavour was extremely depressed and even contemplating suicide. However, the war had encouraged Italians to rise up against the Austrians in northern Italy and to achieve independence for many of the other northern Italian states. ...read more.

Middle

He was anti-clerical, and his main political policy was entitled 'Le juste milieu', a 'happy mean' between revolution and reaction. He was a brilliant businessman and a great moderniser within Piedmont. His main objective was to drive the Austrians out of the Italian states. He thought that once this had been achieved, if Piedmont could control Lombardy and Venetia, then it could dominate the rest of Italy without having to take it over. Garibaldi on the other hand insisted that unification of Italy was essential. He even, to a certain extent, encouraged Cavour to help unify the whole of Italy. Giuseppe Mazzini was the man who influenced Garibaldi in taking up the cause for Italian unification. The two revolutionists had met years prior to the 1848 revolution and Mazzini instilled in Garibaldi a desire for unification at any cost. This was one of the things which Cavour was extremely suspicious about, and a large factor in the decision for Cavour's interception of Garibaldi's Thousand. It is important to remember that Cavour had recently lost control over Garibaldi, when Garibaldi had stopped being a General. Cavour's suspicion certainly destroys the myth surrounding the Risorgimento of the two working together to fight for a cause. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, his loyalty to Victor Emmanuel made the idea impossible. Garibaldi's thought a Republic was the only form of government that could bring about a strong country in which all the people are satisfied. Cavour though thought a Republic was a radical form of government. He was afraid of Garibaldi turning southern Italy into a Republic, which could compete with Piedmont, and this was another reason he intervened when he did. One of Cavour's most important contributions to unification were the economic reforms he made (e.g. building up of industries, factories, railway lines etc.) which helped to make Piedmont stronger than ever before. Garibaldi did nothing of the sort, and therefore when assessing the contributions of the two, it is important to remember that without Garibaldi's military successes, he had nothing. Both Cavour and Garibaldi were essential in helping to unify Italy. They were not the only two figures however. Mazzini stood as the 'Godfather' to all the Mazzinian tactics that many revolutionists used, and the writings of Balbo and Gioberti inspired many. It can be said that without one of them, unification would have been far less likely, but a combination of unlikely circumstances meant that, by accident, unification seemed to suddenly be within touching distance of Italy. It just finally required Cavour and Garibaldi to reach out and grab it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contrast The Contribution Made By Mazzini, Cavour and Garibaldi to Italian Unification

    4 star(s)

    the one in 1834 in Piedmont, organised in co-operation with Garibaldi, ended in failure and Mazzini, once again arrested and with a death sentence, was forced to go into exile to London. Although his contribution was the greatest when it came to the ideological path of the Unification, Mazzini took actions on the political and military field.

  2. Who was more responsible for the success of Italian Unification up to 1861? Cavour, ...

    Napoleon's role however was crucial even though he did pull out. "Whatever his motives for involving himself in Italy it can be argued that without him and him army the Austrians could not have been driven out of Lombardy in 1859."

  1. Compare and contrast Cavour and Garibaldi's contributions to Unification.

    Garibaldi was at heart a Mazzinian. In 1849 he teamed up with Mazzini in controlling Rome, but since that failure he had become more realistic in his approach to the cause of unification. During the 1850s he became an important figure in the National Society, and by 1859, was appointed a Major General in the Sardinian Army.

  2. Did Cavour or Garibaldi contribute more to the unification of Italy?

    Sicily became a focal point for Garibaldi with his new found fame within the kingdom of Sicily he proclaimed himself the dictator in the name of King Victor Emmanuel II and had taken over most of Sicily by the summer of 1860 and had conquered Naples by the winter.

  1. "Cavour put himself first while Garibaldi put Italy first" - Discuss.

    They all agreed to join with Piedmont Sandrine. Cavour also met Nap III again and reached an agreement that France would get Nice and Savoy , Piedmont Sandrine would get Central Duchies. France would not intervene the plebiscites, and Austrian princes would not be restored in the Central Duchies.

  2. Bismarck & Unification

    The man was Otto von Bismarck. A Junker himself, Bismarck had served in the Prussian assembly and as ambassador to Russia and France. A brilliant negotiator, Bismarck embraced the policy of real politick, the right of the state to pursue its own advantage by any means, including war and the repudiation of treaties.

  1. Explain Why The Austrian War Of 1859 Was Important In The Process Of Unification

    The Piedmontese and the French won at Magenta, and twenty days later in Solferino - however, these were narrow victories and an Austrian presence was still prominent within northern Italy. Napoleon III reacted negatively to the significant losses that were suffered, and the inventions of new weaponry at the time

  2. How far do you agree that Cavour made the most significant contribution to Italian ...

    In this respect it would seem he made a significant contribution to Italian unification. However, this is too simplistic. Cavour wanted to create a northern Italian kingdom under Victor Emmanuel II. This was clearly the motivation behind the French alliance and subsequent war with Austria.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work