• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare Sources A B and C as evidence that Churchill instigated the cold war

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Compare Sources A B and C as evidence that Churchill instigated the cold war All three sources I will be comparing in this essay are different to each other and have different messages and viewpoints Source a is minutes from a meeting in October 1945 , Source B is Churchill?s Iron Speech and source C is a cartoon which shows Russia?s response to Churchill?s Iron Speech. In this essay I will compare and contrast the sources as evidence that Churchill instigated the cold war. Source A is minutes from meeting (Moscow Conference) in October 1944. The source shows that Stalin and Churchill made the ?percentage agreement? saying how much of Europe they would both have. The source also shows us Stalin?s and Churchill relationship as it states what was said between them at the meeting. It shows tensions that could be running between the two ?let us burn the paper ?Churchill proposed. No replied Stalin who was eager to have a record of Churchill?s readiness to concede soviet control over so much of Europe. ...read more.

Middle

Also Churchill will have a vested interest in his country so by being nice about Russia ?we welcome Russia to her rightful place among the leading nations of the world? he is maybe trying to be friends and resolve differences so that Churchill has a better chance of stopping Russia spreading communism. However some people believe this source to be good because Churchill was an expert in what he did he was an expert in giving speeches as he did lots of them across the world and which would give him a lot of experience leading people to believe that his ideas were good and fair. I think, in a way this source shows that Churchill is instigating the cold war. Churchill is talking about how the Soviet Union separated Europe in half with physical and mental curtain. He also suggest that the east are against the west and that Europe doesn?t contain the essentials of permanent peace. Also Churchill?s speech was publically said with a televised audience. This meant that the Russians and Stalin were all going to see this speech and maybe meant so the Russians could see, also with the Russian spies that were in USA Stalin would?ve defiantly known about this speech and could annoy him. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also it is not known who the producer of the source is, therefore you don?t know if they have the knowledge, evidence or experience to make a correct judgement,leaving the source to be not as trustworthy or believable. So, in conclusion, I think that the first two sources in a way are evidence that Churchill instigated the cold war. For example source a shows the tensions between the two leaders, which could maybe lead onto a cold war but I think that source is the most useful source because it shows what?s really going on and because the English translation was the same, I think this is quite trustworthy as well. Source B , Churchill?s speech I think is one sided and actually states there?s a mental barrier separating east and west and that if the soviet government try to build up a pro communist German yon their areas it will cause difficulties and that Europe won?t be able to live in peace. And source c is not reliable, it?s a one sided communist view and the person who produced the source isn?t even stated. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    No mention was made of sharing information about the bomb, or of future cooperation to avoid an arms race. Yet the very nature of the new weapon proved a mixed blessing, making it as much a source of provocation as of diplomatic leverage.

  2. Disadvantages of Capitalism.

    The Southerners in the United States had held nearly all political and economic power in the government until the end of the civil war, which granted the Northern Industrialists the majority of governmental power in the United States. In the Northern Industrial society and in small farms immigrants from Ireland, Germany and Scandinavia were among those in the labor force.

  1. An Investigation Into the Way in Which Sir Winston Churchill Used Rhetoric During the ...

    In the 1990s dead civilians became 'collateral damage' in the form of political language which wanted to hide the horror, whilst mass evacuation (and often murder) of civilians belonging to the other side became 'ethnic cleansing'. The key metaphors of politics involve concepts of enemies and opponents, winners and losers;

  2. How useful is source B as evidence to the historian writing about the atomic ...

    America also didn't want to share their powerful knowledge of the atomic bomb with the Soviets. The American government probably saw 1945 as a bad time, for their own safety, to reveal the devastating full affects of the atomic bomb to it's people.

  1. Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill Focusing on his Political Career

    Britain joined the growing international conflict. Throughout the war, the navy's presence in the North Sea dominated and contained the German Fleet. In October 1914, when Antwerp was falling, he characteristically rushed in person to organize its defence. When it fell the public saw only a disillusioning defeat, but in

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    (many of them boys in their early teens), and remembering whether to give a Christian or a Muslim name. Often those who made mistakes were killed on the spot. While death and torture were suffered in the streets, the political battle went on, most heatedly between Pierre Gemayel and Kamal Jumblatt.

  1. Were Some Contemporaries Correct In Their Belief That Churchill Was A Great War Leader?

    To his surprise he was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer in Stanley Baldwin's government, a position he held until the Tory defeat in 1929. During the 1930's Churchill fell out with Baldwin over India's greater self-government and was yet again more isolated in politics.

  2. Citizenship - compare " Show you don't want war" and "Iraq evidence is overwhelming".

    Ali by many tabloids, both Chirac and Mr.Ali have gone onto national and global television claiming that a war is unjustified and that America and Britain are just taking out past frustrations these two very public figures taking their point of view to the media has just made Tony Blair and George W.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work