• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare Sources A B and C as evidence that Churchill instigated the cold war

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Compare Sources A B and C as evidence that Churchill instigated the cold war All three sources I will be comparing in this essay are different to each other and have different messages and viewpoints Source a is minutes from a meeting in October 1945 , Source B is Churchill?s Iron Speech and source C is a cartoon which shows Russia?s response to Churchill?s Iron Speech. In this essay I will compare and contrast the sources as evidence that Churchill instigated the cold war. Source A is minutes from meeting (Moscow Conference) in October 1944. The source shows that Stalin and Churchill made the ?percentage agreement? saying how much of Europe they would both have. The source also shows us Stalin?s and Churchill relationship as it states what was said between them at the meeting. It shows tensions that could be running between the two ?let us burn the paper ?Churchill proposed. No replied Stalin who was eager to have a record of Churchill?s readiness to concede soviet control over so much of Europe. ...read more.


Also Churchill will have a vested interest in his country so by being nice about Russia ?we welcome Russia to her rightful place among the leading nations of the world? he is maybe trying to be friends and resolve differences so that Churchill has a better chance of stopping Russia spreading communism. However some people believe this source to be good because Churchill was an expert in what he did he was an expert in giving speeches as he did lots of them across the world and which would give him a lot of experience leading people to believe that his ideas were good and fair. I think, in a way this source shows that Churchill is instigating the cold war. Churchill is talking about how the Soviet Union separated Europe in half with physical and mental curtain. He also suggest that the east are against the west and that Europe doesn?t contain the essentials of permanent peace. Also Churchill?s speech was publically said with a televised audience. This meant that the Russians and Stalin were all going to see this speech and maybe meant so the Russians could see, also with the Russian spies that were in USA Stalin would?ve defiantly known about this speech and could annoy him. ...read more.


Also it is not known who the producer of the source is, therefore you don?t know if they have the knowledge, evidence or experience to make a correct judgement,leaving the source to be not as trustworthy or believable. So, in conclusion, I think that the first two sources in a way are evidence that Churchill instigated the cold war. For example source a shows the tensions between the two leaders, which could maybe lead onto a cold war but I think that source is the most useful source because it shows what?s really going on and because the English translation was the same, I think this is quite trustworthy as well. Source B , Churchill?s speech I think is one sided and actually states there?s a mental barrier separating east and west and that if the soviet government try to build up a pro communist German yon their areas it will cause difficulties and that Europe won?t be able to live in peace. And source c is not reliable, it?s a one sided communist view and the person who produced the source isn?t even stated. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill Focusing on his Political Career

    In this position, despite substantial achievements in prison reform, he had to principally devote himself to cope with a sweeping wave of industrial unrest and violent strikes. The prison reform reduced lengthy terms, found alternatives to prison for youthful offenders and it distinguished between criminal and political prisoners.

  2. How useful is source B as evidence to the historian writing about the atomic ...

    The photo looks staged as all the men seem to be in very rigid poses and none are looking at the camera. The photo could have been used in a paper to show the ordinary American people how important it was to use the bomb, and the euphoria the servicemen

  1. Disadvantages of Capitalism.

    In reality they will just add to the ever growing population of the poor classes. In a Capitalist society the rich get richer and the poor stay poor. In the end this will lead to great unrest and low morale in the society.

  2. Citizenship - compare " Show you don't want war" and "Iraq evidence is overwhelming".

    all the difficulty, Saddam Hussein, is still yet to make an appearance in the media. The war introduced several technologically advanced weapon systems. As well, the United States forged a broad-based international coalition that confronted Iraq militarily strategy. In article 2 it quotes " Iraqi's tyrant has weapons of mass

  1. Anzacs and the Gallipoli Campaign of 1915. How useful are the views of the ...

    If you connect this confidence view with the idea that there were a lot of veteran Anzacs used then the Anzac army must have been very good but if their confidence is linked up with their average characters it shows that they were most probably arrogant.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    "Control of their border areas," the historian Walter LaFeber has noted, "was worth more to the Russians than a billion, or even ten billion dollars." A year earlier the response might have been different. But 1946 was a "year of cement," with little if any willingness to accept flexibility.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    As some of Ahmad Khatib's forces surrounded and besieged the town of Zahle in the Beqaa, other LAA troops along with the National Movement and the PLO advanced on the Maronites in Beirut, and came right to the Metn, the constituency of Pierre Gemayel's elder son Amin, the Maronite heartland.

  2. An Investigation Into the Way in Which Sir Winston Churchill Used Rhetoric During the ...

    British people, although some parts of the speech are directed towards neutral countries. Churchill's effectiveness depended on persuading his audience of the merits of his message. At the time of this speech, there was an uneasy silence after several tumultuous events had occurred the previous year.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work